Jump to content

What scale would you prefer the VF-4 in?  

87 members have voted

  1. 1. What scale would you prefer the VF-4 in?

    • 1/72
      1
    • 1/60
      24
    • 1/48
      59


Recommended Posts

Posted

:ph34r: Take a rest there..........you're going poll crazy.

BTW......What would be the size comparison between a 1/48 (which I also voted for) VF-1 and VF-4. If it's twice as large as a VF-1 I think it has to be larger than a 1/60, the transformation process is something we haven't seen animated before (sorry....I haven't seen Macross 7 yet).

Posted
maybe i should make a new poll...asking if i am making TOO MANY or TOO LESS polls?

hehehehe

-Jin

Geez... enough with the polls.

You must be Shin Densetsu's evil twin brotha :lol: Gittin' all "poll" crazy!!!

Besides, I really dont care for the VF-4

Posted

i thought i made a poll like this about 2 months ago or something, oh well. I voted 1/48, as i feel they should have the greatest attention to detail on that scale, and they dont have really bad QC issues as they did the 1/60's on the VF-1's. So here's hoping they dont mess up the VF-4 at all

Posted
Here is the comparison....

oh yea, btw, the valks in that pic are out of scale... it was mentioned in another thread.

Posted

As long as they make it in 1/48th I'll be satisfied. More than likely if they make it at all they'll make it in both 1/48th and one other scale. Probably 1/72 unless they can't get the transformation right at that size. I'd prefere 1/60, then again I'd prefere all of Yamato's smaller stuff to be 1/60. C'est la vie.

Posted

If the 1/48 scale is supose to be for "collectors" then I can see no better canadate for that line, after all it would be the first VF-4 "TOY" ever made. So my vote is for 1/48.

Posted
1/60. I/48 is too big and expensive.

It was my understanding that a VF-4 wasn't much larger than a VF-1.

Anyone actually have pictures drawn to scale?

Posted

1/60 for me. More affordable, still a good size with good detail, and if I really like it I can get a second to put in battroid without killing myself. A 1/48 would look sweet though I'm sure. I'm anxious to see how the design and transformation come out.

Posted

Just like with the VF-1, 1/60 to be the guinea pig at lower cost and size and then do it "right" (and more limited, detailed, and bling) at 1/48.

Posted (edited)

Can some valk expert list the valks on that scale chart in order for those of us who are post-TV-DYRL-challenged?

Here are my guesses

VF-1 (DYRL-SDF Macross)

VF-4 (Flashback 2012)

???

VF-11 (Macross Plus)

???

VF-19 (Macross Plus)

VF-21 (Macross Plus)

Thanks!

H

Edited by Hurin
Posted
Can some valk expert list the valks on that scale chart in order for those of us who are post-TV-DYRL-challenged?

Here are my guesses

VF-1 (DYRL-SDF Macross)

VF-4 (Flashback 2012)

???

VF-11 (Macross Plus)

???

VF-19 (Macross Plus)

VF-21 (Macross Plus)

Thanks!

H

VF-1

VF-4

VF-5000 (Macross 7 - Dynamite?)

VF-11

VF-17 (Macross 7)

YF-19

YF-21

Posted
...

VF-5000 (Macross 7 - Dynamite?)

...

nope. The VF-5000 was in some games. ;)

Posted

In the Macross Design Works, the VF-5000 is attributed to Macross 7, by which I assume they mean 'Dynamite 7'. Unless the M7 and D7 licenses are treated as different properties, we might not see it for a long while.

On the other hand, we might see an M3 VF-14, as the design was significantly altered from that shown in Macross 7.

Posted

I'd love it in 1/60 (that's what I voted for), but Yamato would probably make it in 1/72.

Posted

What is WRONG with you people that DON'T want the VF-4 to be made?? :ph34r:

I say make it 1/48.... I have a reason for this...

As I have said before, I think the 1/48 line should be used for the COMPLETE Skull Squadron, and any of the more rare Valks... That way they just seem that much more "special" :D

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...