David Hingtgen Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 (edited) http://www.almansur.com/jollyrogers/tomcattwilight.htm The Black Knight's new Bugs' colors aren't nearly as cool as the previous few F-14 schemes, let's hope the Jolly Rogers don't follow suit. Interesting note: I've got personal pics of VF-103 with JFK lettering back in July, so I think they've been "home" for quite a while. Edited June 18, 2004 by David Hingtgen Quote
Chuey Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Wow, thanks for sharing. Aside from the obvious Macross reference, I always apprecite the history associated with the Jolly Rogers and carrier aircraft. Wasn't VF-103 used in science fiction picture Final Countdown? Final Countdown Photo Gallery Quote
Jolly Rogers Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Wow, this has been a $h!tty month so far. Quote
Skull Leader Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Well, at least they're one of the last F-14 squadrons to turn in their keys, right? There's only a few squadrons left if I remember correctly. Quote
mechaninac Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Very sad news for F-14 fans everywhere. Somehow, the tomcats had a mystique that is sorely absent in the super hornet. They will be missed. Quote
B-52 GUNNER Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Does anyone know how to strech this onto a flat circular plane? In wother words, so that you are looking straight at it instead of at the lower right corner. I'm trying to make this into a plaque and I need photoshop help. Thanks in advance Scot Quote
Anubis Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Very sad news for F-14 fans everywhere. Somehow, the tomcats had a mystique that is sorely absent in the super hornet. They will be missed. I second that. The crying picture as well. Quote
Angel's Fury Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Very sad news for F-14 fans everywhere. Somehow, the tomcats had a mystique that is sorely absent in the super hornet. They will be missed. I second that. The crying picture as well. Make that three. Very sad news indeed. Quote
jasonkimberson Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 wow thats sad to hear... a real low vis going out of service Quote
Prowlus Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 (edited) According to a recent defence paper even the D-model will get an early retirement aswell DEFENSE DAILY 16 JUN 04 > > Tomcat Transition To Super Hornet Complete By Fall '06, Admiral Says > > By Lorenzo Cortes > > The Navy will successfully retire the remainder of its Northrop Grumman [NOC] > F-14 Tomcat fleet in fall 2006 thanks to an accelerated schedule that also > includes introducing Boeing [bA] F/A-18E/F Super Hornet fighter-bombers > earlier, according to the Atlantic Fleet's air forces chief. > > "One of the things that we have been able to do as a result of some good > production with our industry partners with the success of the multiyear with > the E and F is we were able to look at and make a decision to accelerate the > transition of the last of the F-14 squadrons to the F/A-18E/F," Rear Adm. Jim > Zortman, commander of Naval Air Forces Atlantic, said last week during the > Association of Naval Aviation's 2004 convention in Vienna, Va. "That is taking > place right now, > and by fall of '06, we will have made that transition. ... Edited June 18, 2004 by Prowlus Quote
Opus Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. Quote
Opus Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Does anyone know how to strech this onto a flat circular plane?In wother words, so that you are looking straight at it instead of at the lower right corner. I'm trying to make this into a plaque and I need photoshop help. Thanks in advance Scot I know poo about image editing. Maybe you can use this for comparison. Quote
Hurricane29 Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Well this sucks, definately the end of a era. Quote
David Hingtgen Posted June 18, 2004 Author Posted June 18, 2004 Prowlus already posted what I was going to add this morning--the accelerated retirement of the F-14. VF-143 and -31 will still be the final B and D squadrons I think. -211 should still be the final A. Quote
David Hingtgen Posted June 18, 2004 Author Posted June 18, 2004 (edited) Here's a straight on shot of the 60th Ann tail: http://www.clubhyper.com/reference/images/...rs60yrsdp_1.jpg Edited June 18, 2004 by David Hingtgen Quote
Hybridchild Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Really is the end of an era ah well Hybridchild Quote
eugimon Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. I agree with you... but I don't think anyone is saying that we shouldn't be modernizing our weapons.. just that it's sad to see this bird go... thanks to a certain movie and an anime plane that bears resemblance to it... many of us have fond memories of it... Quote
Opus Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. I agree with you... but I don't think anyone is saying that we shouldn't be modernizing our weapons.. just that it's sad to see this bird go... thanks to a certain movie and an anime plane that bears resemblance to it... many of us have fond memories of it... I get what you're saying. I guess I jumped the gun. When ever f-14s and 18's are mentioned in the same thread it usually turn into an f-18 hatefest. After thinking about it I'm glad they're getting F-18s. VF-84 are the Jolly Roger Tomcats I grew up with. VF-103 have always sort of come off as posers to me. Now they can make thier own legacy in thier own planes as VFA-103. Quote
Shin Densetsu Kai 7.0 Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. I agree with you... but I don't think anyone is saying that we shouldn't be modernizing our weapons.. just that it's sad to see this bird go... thanks to a certain movie and an anime plane that bears resemblance to it... many of us have fond memories of it... I get what you're saying. I guess I jumped the gun. When ever f-14s and 18's are mentioned in the same thread it usually turn into an f-18 hatefest. After thinking about it I'm glad they're getting F-18s. VF-84 are the Jolly Roger Tomcats I grew up with. VF-103 have always sort of come off as posers to me. Now they can make thier own legacy in thier own planes as VFA-103. its not really a hatefest. It is more of "why is the navy settling for less?" I am very sad to see the skull and bones tomcats go and am sure the hornets will not loook as good with the skulls. THe F-18F, your right IS a good airplane but not the IDEAL plane to replace the tomcat. TO me only tomcat 21 OR a New stealth swing wing large multirole strike navy fighter can EVER ideally replace the tomcat and outdo it. The F-14 was able to outdo the F-4 in every respect. The F-4 2was not able to outdo the sader so its like this era is a deja vu of the era when the phantom replaced the crusader. Quote
ewilen Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 It was only a matter of time... before Shin made an appearance... Quote
David Hingtgen Posted June 18, 2004 Author Posted June 18, 2004 Opus---I too always felt VF-103 weren't the "real" Jolly Rogers I grew up with. Quote
the white drew carey Posted June 18, 2004 Posted June 18, 2004 Not a perfect circle, but better... Quote
That NOS Guy Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 The U.S. Navy's replacement of the F-14 has done more damage to my faith in a just God then all the poverty in the world combined. -NOS Whose voting for Kerry because Cheney is a scumbag Quote
one_klump Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. Yeah, perfectly adequate. Yup. Thats exactly what the US needs for air supremacy. Adaquate planes. Quote
Prowlus Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 (edited) the variety of aircraft on a typical carrier deck just shrunk even more . I remember when a carrier deck had squadrons of F-8s, A-4s, F-4s and A6's all crammed into one boat now after the turkey and prowler goes, the F-18 will be the only fast jet combat craft to grace the decks for a long time to come (especially if the F-35 is gonna be inevitably delayed) a fitting picture to an aurcraft reaching the sunset of its career Edited June 19, 2004 by Prowlus Quote
eugimon Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 History channel is running a program on the history of the f-14... it ends with a happy ending, saying how detractors said the f-14 was finished back in the 80's but how upgrades kept it going another 2 decades and how the f-14 will keep flying well into this new century. if only... Quote
Shin Densetsu Kai 7.0 Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. Yeah, perfectly adequate. Yup. Thats exactly what the US needs for air supremacy. Adaquate planes. Yes very good point. For defense and supremacyyou need the BEST not somethinbg that will "oh yea this will do". And hell someone had to crash the party and represent the tomcat! and that person is ME. Again not all planes would be in maintenance hangers and also not all planes in a fighter squadron launch up all at once it is at intervals. Also a TU-126/95's ASM's have longer ranges than the AMRAAM does so with that in mind by the time the super bug gets a positive lock on on the bomber the ASM from the bomber will have already been launched. And its just a time to play catch up to all the ASM's. Is this possible? YES it is. It isn't "oh no shin that was uh yea like 80s threatrs" as long as the very threat EXISTS no matter HOWUNLIKELY it may sound there needs to be a good defense against that. And a lot of you may say "oh well a tomcat is uhg ytea kuz uh phoneix missle oh yea phioniex": but see the tomcat is no way in hell like a F111B or a missleer. Not to mention the speed of the tomcat is faster than the superbug and most importantly RANGE. Sorry for making another antihornet post but lets be realistic tomcats ROCK Quote
Opus Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 I'm sure people reacted the same way when VF-84 switched from F-8 to F-4s or from F-4s to F-14s. You can't let sentimentality stand in the way of progress. The F-18 is a perfectly good plane. Maybe not the coolest, but perfectly adequate. It's my opinion that the pilot is more important than the plane anyway. The AVG tought us that in WW2. Yeah, perfectly adequate. Yup. Thats exactly what the US needs for air supremacy. Adaquate planes. Yes very good point. For defense and supremacyyou need the BEST not somethinbg that will "oh yea this will do". And hell someone had to crash the party and represent the tomcat! and that person is ME. Again not all planes would be in maintenance hangers and also not all planes in a fighter squadron launch up all at once it is at intervals. Also a TU-126/95's ASM's have longer ranges than the AMRAAM does so with that in mind by the time the super bug gets a positive lock on on the bomber the ASM from the bomber will have already been launched. And its just a time to play catch up to all the ASM's. Is this possible? YES it is. It isn't "oh no shin that was uh yea like 80s threatrs" as long as the very threat EXISTS no matter HOWUNLIKELY it may sound there needs to be a good defense against that. And a lot of you may say "oh well a tomcat is uhg ytea kuz uh phoneix missle oh yea phioniex": but see the tomcat is no way in hell like a F111B or a missleer. Not to mention the speed of the tomcat is faster than the superbug and most importantly RANGE. Sorry for making another antihornet post but lets be realistic tomcats ROCK Come on now, seriously. There are no bombers. All the Tomcat has been doing for the past 10 years is drop bombs and take photos, two jobs it was never intended for. I think you see through rose tinted glasses. Sure the Tomcat rocked in it's day, but it's day is over. I'm no Hornet lover but it's a good plane all the same and if it gets the job done for less of my tax dollars that's good enough for me. The reality of logistics is that the older the airframe gets the more maitenace hours are required to keep it flying. It's time to put the old war horsees out to pasture. Quote
KingNor Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 (edited) Hows this look? Edited June 19, 2004 by KingNor Quote
KingNor Posted June 19, 2004 Posted June 19, 2004 Not a perfect circle, but better... you know, i specifically looked to see if anyone had tried already.. musta missed yours' Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.