Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

when in atmospheric flight (no fast pack), were are placed the gunpods of the VF2SS ?

how works the mechanism that moves the legs pivot from fighter to gerwalk to robot? more magic swing bars?

I remember there were some sites arround with info about the 2ss ... any links?

tnx!

Posted

I'm not certain about the answer to your questions, but I can tell you that the VF2SS was not designed for atmospheric useage and thus you should not see that situation (unless emergency etc and then I do not know).

Posted

IIRC, the gunpods go in the legs don't they? Or maybe in the armor pack... been awhile...

Posted (edited)

Magnets????? :unsure:

Seriously, that is a damn good question. Can't blame the froating head for that one though, as he didn't make that one.

Edited by Anubis
Posted

AFAIK, the VF-2SS was never meant to be w/o the FAST Packs. Considering that the forearm Pack was used as storage for the gunpods and that the -2SS was meant ONLY for space, one can say that they opted not to include a non-armored hardpoint for the gunpod.

Even in emergency entry into an atomosphere, you need to ditch all the FAST Packs and gunpod anyway. You wouldn't want yer gunpod to explode right from under ya, ne?

Also the only time I saw the -2SS w/o FAST Packs was during exhibitions.

I have the Paladium RPG book for Macross II. Granted, I take their info with a pillar of salt, but I do like the lineart. None of 'em show an VF-2SS w/o FAST Packs sporting a gunpod.

If any knows, what kind of projectile system do they use for the gunpods in MII? The RPG books states they're railguns with explosive-tipped rounds. *licks the pillar of salt*

Posted

More than a decade ago, I had a Japanese friend translate some of the text in the TIAS Mac II book and IIRC, the gunpods are railguns.

Also IIRC, even the big gun on the SAP is a railgun, something which the Paladium RPG got wrong.

Graham

Posted
Only for space? Then why the airplane based design? Those wings and tail fins are a complete waste.

that's the point... the VF2ss has a very atmospheric design...

I'm beginning to think that the only weaponry without SAP is the head mounted cannons... or maybe a different SAP version for atmospheric flight we have never seen (could it be fan to try to design one)

thanks all for the info

Posted

Just because we have never seen the gunpods attached in atmospheric fighter mode, doesn't mean that they can't be attached. A gunpod (or perhaps even 2 gunpods) probably just attach to the arms.

Graham

Posted

The VF-2SS is not meant ONLY for space but it is optimized for space. It's perfectly capable of operating in space, though it's not optimized like the VF-2JA.

Posted
The VF-2SS is not meant ONLY for space but it is optimized for space. It's perfectly capable of operating in space, though it's not optimized like the VF-2JA.

Splitting hairs here, but I think that it is meant only for space, but capable of surviving in the well.

The question is: can the 2JA survive in space? Does it have the necesary engine mods to burn in space or was that left out to make it cheaper/lighter as it was meant for atmospheric use?

Posted
The VF-2SS is not meant ONLY for space but it is optimized for space.  It's perfectly capable of operating in space, though it's not optimized like the VF-2JA.

Splitting hairs here, but I think that it is meant only for space, but capable of surviving in the well.

The question is: can the 2JA survive in space? Does it have the necesary engine mods to burn in space or was that left out to make it cheaper/lighter as it was meant for atmospheric use?

I read in one og the Macross II books that a VF-2JA can operate in space.

Posted
The VF-2SS is not meant ONLY for space but it is optimized for space.  It's perfectly capable of operating in space, though it's not optimized like the VF-2JA.

Splitting hairs here, but I think that it is meant only for space, but capable of surviving in the well.

The question is: can the 2JA survive in space? Does it have the necesary engine mods to burn in space or was that left out to make it cheaper/lighter as it was meant for atmospheric use?

I read in one og the Macross II books that a VF-2JA can operate in space.

I think it should be said this way. The VF-2JA is optimize for atmopheric use. The 2JA has forward carnards while the VF-2SS does not. The profile of the VF-2JA is also slimmer. Etc., etc., etc.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...