Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Can you import .max or .3ds files?

Yup - can do it with NUGRAF, PolyTrans or Deep Exploration - all 3 can go back and forth between Maya and 3DS (and also Lightwave, and probably also XSI, Cinema4D, Truspace....)

Posted

Or you can get the free 3ds importer from the alias site, can only import into maya though, XSI has one also to import in from 3ds, and Maya, also free.

Posted
thanks for the praise, guys :)

but that old thing? and here I was thinking of scrapping that old cockpit and starting fresh on a new one...

I still might start a new one, though. or, at least a heavily updated re-do. at the very least, I really want to make a highly optimized low-poly (high-end real time game engine quality) version (simplify the geometry, while making the texutre/spec/bump maps from the high-res version).

my ultimate goal would be to do an entire VF-1 that way. I'd love to do it all myself, if I could just find the time. a collaborative effort might be more practical (and more likely to get finished...). I'd love to put together the best of everybody's work, and just collectively tweak it into perfection. who's game?

If you scrap that cockpit send the leftovers to me!!! ;) It is really a good cockpit.

Regds,

Gorgon

Posted (edited)

DOK!

You rule man, thanks again for all the tips. I think I can finally realize my dreams of a completed Valk now that I have an idea how to texture. Just threw up a few quick textures, totally rough just to see what it would look like.

Was wondering, anyone got tips on how to make a good metal looking texture? Aluminum-ish as opposed to shiny metal. Kind of dull and spotted.

Thanks!

rick2.jpg

:Dat

Edited by DatterBoy
Posted

Thanks Dok,

but you know, I still think I need to learn how to map by unwrapping polygons as well since there are some things I can't do with the projected maps. For instance, you'll notice the stretch on the intake arrows on the chest. I'm wondering, perhaps a texture assigned to a face would fix that issue, or would I have to learn some more advanced mapping techniques?

:Dat

Posted

Another nice pic there Datterboy! Btw, good job with the other half of the pic you did with Doktor Gonzo.

Posted
Thanks Dok,

but you know, I still think I need to learn how to map by unwrapping polygons as well since there are some things I can't do with the projected maps. For instance, you'll notice the stretch on the intake arrows on the chest. I'm wondering, perhaps a texture assigned to a face would fix that issue, or would I have to learn some more advanced mapping techniques?

:Dat

Dat: Pretty much either-or. You could assign the projection from such an angle that it wouldn't warp. OR (and I've done this more often than I care to admit) you could "counter-warp" the arrow decal in Photoshop, so that it appears straight as projected. OR if you want to really sink the time into learning how to unwrap meshes, the place to visit is Maya's UV Texture Editor. It has a lot of options, but most can be ignored at first. Concentrate on the Cut and Sew UVs options, and the "framing" options, and remember that you can drag around vertices in here over the 2D map the same way you'd move them in a Maya ortho view. Oh, and you might find the "UV Texture Snapshop" option very useful. This dumps out an image of the texture map with the current UV mapping superimposed.... good for modifying texture maps in Photoshop....

Posted

I'd agree, that's probably your best bet. But I would become acquainted with the various different map types available, like cylindrical maps, and such, for rounded surfaces. Also, one thing I've found helpful is to use a "normal align" feature to assign UV coordinates to individual flat areas of complex shapes, and then move the pieces around on the UV map until they line up... It can be a pain stretching pieces around, but it'll allow you to map some really complex shapes very well.

Btw, danbickell, I'm hoping to eventually get around to doing most of the more famous Macross fighters for MS Flight Sim, and personally I hate doing cockpits...I'd love to be able to use something of that detail in a flyable VF-1. :D I can't tell you when I'll get to it though, you may be able to finish the whole plane before I start. :p

Posted

Another update. Sorry about all the similar looking pics, but I'm really excited about this whole texturing thing (I'm such a texture idiot)

Added some backplate textures, thinned out nose and chest panel lines, fixed some discoloration isues between tyhe body and the nosecone, etc...

rick_2.jpg

:Dat

Posted (edited)

Heres my small contribution, its not meant to be a high poly completely accurate reproduction, more like a game quality model with some appropriate proportion.

What I did was cut up my previous plane model(which you can see somewhere back in the thread) and arranged the parts to more or less resemble the complete battroid mode, and i used this model as a base for my proportions, and made my changes. Right now i'm working on the textures( they are all like 128x128 pixel so = not much detail) and the right leg is missing because i haven't stated working on the UVWs.

post-5-1077844946_thumb.jpg

Edited by mk16
Posted (edited)

mk16 nice 19. could the pedistrian under the giant robot GET THE HELL OUTTA THERE! :p

I've built the hands and landing gear and fixed a few details and added some CF colours

edit: the darn link doesn't work here the url instead

edit: nope works again :p

Picture

Edited by skatata
Posted (edited)

hmmm I did make sure that the mecha form was 14.50m high. i scaled everything proportionally to match the Batt at 14.50m. And the "Civilian" is 6.2 :) i can assure you of that.

The image bellow is orthographic so theres no distortion due to perspective. The boxes you see are 14.50 meters and 6ft respectably. hmm but i do think that the feet are pretty bulky tho. they don't seem right for the use they get in valk mode.

post-5-1077944834_thumb.jpg

Edited by mk16
Posted

Actually, the feet do extend... they're tucked deep inside the leg in fighter mode. The startup sequence when Isamu steals it shows the feet opening up and extending from a completely closed position when the engines are started. So I wouldn't worry about the sizes of the feet.. you can always just tuck them inside a little to make them look right. :)

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
:: bump ::

Good show!

Sorry for the inactivity, been really busy elsewhere.

Az: Sorry man, that last file you sent me didn't work out. I was able to get it converted to Maya format, but it had no hands, and I had some trouble anyway getting a battroid that looks like the one in your renders - obviously, you know how to handle your model much better than I do! Any chance you could send me a version already in battroid mode? Thanks!

-Peter

Posted (edited)

I got a request for a VF-1's main gear retraction sequence explanation, so here goes.

Closest real-life plane I can think of is actually the F/A-18's, though they're somewhat at an angle.

Anyways, assuming the gear's down, you open up the gear bay doors, and retract the strut rearward. While it's doing so, the entire wheel/axle rotates 90 degrees so that the "face" of the wheel ends up facing downwards, when the gear's fully retracted. Then the gear doors close. (There's a lot of debate of which, if any, gear doors on a VF-1 remain open when the gear's down. I myself portray them closed where possible). Really depends on the plane. Most Navy planes keep them open, Air Force planes tend to close them when possible. (Though Air Force planes are also more likely to have them designed so they have to all stay open)

VF-19's gear is similar, BTW. Though it may incorporate a Z-fold, even more like the F/A-18.

Edited by David Hingtgen
Posted

I got my money on gear doors staying down. If not for the fact alone that the -14 and -18 have doors staying down. I DO think that the panel forward of the main gear doors ( with the colored lenses on them) is capapble of retracting seperate from the main gear doors. I have some refs for the main gears DG. I'll dig em up.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...