Adventure Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 Destroyed Hmmm... so is this a typo? Or is it just Engrish? :-) Also note, they used GARWALK instead of GERWALK. BTW, I love the VF-0D Gerwalk shot... it just looks so cool :-) Quote
UN Spacy Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 LOL. Destroyed, Bulky Lee, etc. What's next? I also noticed there's five more coming soon squares. What do you guys think is going to belong in those area's? Destroid Monster? GBP-1S Armored Valkyrie? The ASS-1? Quote
Knight26 Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 (edited) Probably just an Engrish error, but I love that new shot, looks like it might have mini missiles on the shoulders, RAM launchers, woohoo, the thing is the ultimate walking CIWS, I love it. Everyone welcome the CIWS Destroid. Or maybe they are just chaff and flare dispensers, but hey a RAM ISEA can dream can't he, I'd love to see my launcher or something resembling my launhcer in Macross-0. And hey justy noticed this the update was yesterday, what a great Birthday present, thanks Shoji, does that mean I can expect the lego valks in the mail soon, hehe. Edited August 28, 2003 by Knight26 Quote
Adventure Posted August 28, 2003 Author Posted August 28, 2003 How about the Konig Monster? :-) Maybe VF-0S Strike Valkyrie and VF-0D Strike Valkyrie :> Quote
JB0 Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 LOL. Destroyed, Bulky Lee, etc. What's next? I also noticed there's five more coming soon squares. What do you guys think is going to belong in those area's? Destroid Monster? GBP-1S Armored Valkyrie? The ASS-1? ASS... I love that acronym. I vote armored VF-0. Quote
SuperOstrich Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 Or maybe they are just chaff and flare dispensers, but hey a RAM ISEA can dream can't he, I'd love to see my launcher or something resembling my launhcer in Macross-0. Let's start calling you RAM, like in Tron. "Oh my User!" Quote
ArchVile Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 um, whats CIWS. Anyways, just an Engrish Error I bet. Quote
Yohsho Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 LOL. Destroyed, Bulky Lee, etc. What's next? I also noticed there's five more coming soon squares. What do you guys think is going to belong in those area's? Destroid Monster? GBP-1S Armored Valkyrie? The ASS-1? Let's see they need to put in the Mig, a GBP VF-0, and a VF-1. I don't know what else. Quote
Ranger_Karl Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 Maybe it's a kind of foreshadow as to what happens to that Destroid.... Quote
Anubis Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 LOL. Destroyed, Bulky Lee, etc. What's next? I also noticed there's five more coming soon squares. What do you guys think is going to belong in those area's? Destroid Monster? GBP-1S Armored Valkyrie? The ASS-1? VF-1A, VF-1D, VF-1S, something else from the Anti-UN Side, and the ASS-1. Quote
Bub Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 LOL. Destroyed, Bulky Lee, etc. What's next? I also noticed there's five more coming soon squares. What do you guys think is going to belong in those area's? Destroid Monster? GBP-1S Armored Valkyrie? The ASS-1? The VF-1A Low Visibility Valkyrie! Quote
Isamu Atreides 86 Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 um, whats CIWS.Anyways, just an Engrish Error I bet. i think it means "Close-In Weapons System", they use on carriers and other naval vessels to shoot down missiles.... Quote
Raptor Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 (edited) The Macross is one sweet ASS... Or better yet, "The UN has one sweet ASS." Err... hehehe... Edited August 28, 2003 by Raptor Quote
Roy Focker Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 Don't you remember Destroid is combo of the words Desroy+Droid. Calling it Destroyed has to be an Engrish mistake. Quote
Aegis! Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 Gotta love engrish I bet the other slots must be for the Armored VF-0 , a new Anti-UN fighter (the compendium has a SV-52 listed so who knows...), the VF-1 (hopefully as a low-vis variant ) and the other Destroid. Quote
imode Posted August 28, 2003 Posted August 28, 2003 VF-0A and the SV-52 are almost certain. Not sure whether or not they'll list the 0A tho. That's already made an appearance and it's not on the page yet. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.