Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted


Nothing much new with this review, except he shows how the legs can be completely detached from the waist joint, ala Bandai DX.

Video also doesn’t show anything with the 3rd elbow joint; it’s stuck in position as with all the other videos.

Hilariously he also installs the missiles backwards, & has that huge ass gap between the arms & head in Fighter. I think there must be something wrong in the instruction manual for so many reviewers to do so.

Posted

wow thanks jvmacross!  great comparo.  seems like a mixed bag.  engineering wise in terms of tolerances, fit, and molding yamato/arcadia still seems to be the king (at least tied with the bandai).  aesthetics i think is personal preference.  beefy arms i like.  sticking below legs in fighter mode...i think it was a compromise that willingly made which i don't think i'd have made that tradeoff.  some might disagree with it but i don't think it was a "mistake" it came out that way to 3Z.  obviously the 3Z wins in terms of articulation.  in any case, i think there are a few other things that are dumb changes from the DX too, but i still need one of these in my hands to see how i feel about it.  i am kind of doubting i'll want I want more than 1 though now.  we'll see. 

Posted

One other thing....the Three Zero VF-1J is heavy....about as much as a 1/55....and no clicking joints anywhere to be found...not sure what that holds for future floppiness....it's the only Three Zero product I own so no idea how these hold up to minimal use, let alone transformation type of wear...

Posted

It looks like a great alternative for people who don't have the space nor funds to acquire aftermarket DX 1/48's.

I feel like in that video he didn't bring the arms up anough in fighter mode because that gap between the shoulders and head was way too big.

My only real criticism of that VF-1J is I don't like how pure white it is and would prefer a more white/grey like Bandai's DX.

Posted
22 minutes ago, jvmacross said:

large.20240701_183807.jpg.72fffbd88143a9

large.20240701_183856.jpg.a3d1cca9549be7

 

OMG!  That's the most Robotech thing to do ever!

ROFLMAO!!!  :bump:

I really do pity the hapless reviewers for following that...

 

 

 

Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, treatment said:

 

OMG!  That's the most Robotech thing to do ever!

ROFLMAO!!!  :bump:

I really do pity the hapless reviewers for following that...

 

 

 

LOL! that is strange that they never caught this...🙈

Or maybe Macross got it wrong and Robotech got it right!? 🤣

Edited by grogall
Posted
On 6/29/2024 at 12:04 AM, m0n5t3r said:

 

Awesome pics!

Curious how it would look beside the Yamato with the legs extended. 

 

So played around with the leg extension and settled on this much extension as a compromise...not enough and it is still too short, too much and it just looks wrong....at this amount of leg extension it is just about the same height in Battroid as the Yamato 1/60 VF-1....

large.20240701_204629.jpg.edc770f86255b2

large.20240701_204645.jpg.eab0033e7ccb4b

large.20240701_204702.jpg.c355d85e251445

large.20240701_204719.jpg.4de5894bb570b5

large.20240701_204736.jpg.8f8e16befb8209

large.20240701_204740.jpg.07597de89e201d

large.20240701_204746.jpg.19485e05c4d970

Posted
8 minutes ago, jvmacross said:

So played around with the leg extension and settled on this much extension as a compromise...not enough and it is still too short, too much and it just looks wrong....at this amount of leg extension it is just about the same height in Battroid as the Yamato 1/60 VF-1....

large.20240701_204719.jpg.4de5894bb570b5

 

Not bad. Great comparison :good:. And definitely no shortage of photos! The gaps might not be too noticable if the "kneecaps" were opened up a bit. 

 

Posted
4 hours ago, jvmacross said:

large.20240701_183807.jpg.72fffbd88143a9

large.20240701_183856.jpg.a3d1cca9549be7


Hahaha mystery solved.. TZ implement animation errors in spirit. At least TZ didn’t draw the missiles being mounted onto the vertical stabilizers. :p

Posted
Just now, MKT said:


Hahaha mystery solved.. TZ implement animation errors in spirit. At least TZ didn’t draw the missiles being mounted onto the vertical stabilizers. :p

Screenshot_20240701-2240202.png.a7f2efcdd621ffa9cfd77af97e4f1c9d.png

Episode 10 for those wondering

Posted
2 hours ago, jvmacross said:

So played around with the leg extension and settled on this much extension as a compromise...not enough and it is still too short, too much and it just looks wrong....at this amount of leg extension it is just about the same height in Battroid as the Yamato 1/60 VF-1....

large.20240701_204629.jpg.edc770f86255b2

large.20240701_204645.jpg.eab0033e7ccb4b

large.20240701_204702.jpg.c355d85e251445

large.20240701_204719.jpg.4de5894bb570b5

large.20240701_204736.jpg.8f8e16befb8209

large.20240701_204740.jpg.07597de89e201d

large.20240701_204746.jpg.19485e05c4d970

 

Have you been able to have a look at the elbows? The suspense is killing me.

 

 

Posted (edited)

It looks like that supposed 3rd elbow joint is fixed. I hope threezero is checking this thread and will correct this and whatever else for the VF-1S. They have at least 6 months to make improvements.

Edited by m0n5t3r
Posted
5 hours ago, Froy said:

Screenshot_20240701-2240202.png.a7f2efcdd621ffa9cfd77af97e4f1c9d.png

Episode 10 for those wondering

Now we know who's bringing the beer to Friday Night's get-together. :lol:

Posted
On 6/30/2024 at 6:51 AM, jvmacross said:

....but now I found another part that I have no idea what it is used for, but seems to also be so loose that when 'swooshed' around you can hear it move....it is located inside of the front landing gear and does not seem to impede the front landing gear in any way, but just seems odd that it is so loose...guess I'll go take a look at the DX and see if the same part is there too...LOL

large.20240629_174240.jpg.bb2a18421999c4


This is also the other unsolved mystery - the purpose of this flap. It even has a tab as if for your fingernail to pull it out.

Posted
2 minutes ago, MKT said:


This is also the other unsolved mystery - the purpose of this flap. It even has a tab as if for your fingernail to pull it out.

Maybe it's for the escape pod!? 🤪

Posted

large.20240701_215809.jpg.30729d917d9780

large.20240701_222350.jpg.4f192aa3e7e601

large.20240701_220557.jpg.7f8534d0792b74

large.20240701_220425.jpg.ffef3e4b930cfe

large.20240701_220311.jpg.a28316eab40750

 

IMO....Probably the easiest and most fun "DX" VF-1 to pose to date....maybe the absence of all the joint clicking noise makes it less stressful...lol

Also...that additional joint that was shown in earlier promo pics is gone...the only rotation is via the "bicep" piece directly underneath the shoulder piece...

Posted

Last off topic post I pinky swear

Just wanted to tell you guys I did end up ordering a Yamato 1/60 V2 Roy Fokker with super parts (tv version) off ami-ami for about 150 bucks :) thank you for the suggestions 

I might end up getting the VF-1S version of the threezero depending on how it turns out, but I am cancelling my VF-1J preorder. Maybe if they release a VF-1J GBP box set with a bunch of missile display parts I'll buy that 

Posted

Another annoying aspect of the Three Zero VF-1 is how the chest piece in Battroid does not connect securely to the chest cavity pieces.....with handling, the connection comes apart leaving it looking like it has a gap....it just seems, at least in my copy, that the tab and slots are not sufficient to hold them firmly together at all times...I suppose you can opt to not add the chest cavity parts, but it looks better with them installed...

Posted
30 minutes ago, jvmacross said:

Another annoying aspect of the Three Zero VF-1 is how the chest piece in Battroid does not connect securely to the chest cavity pieces.....with handling, the connection comes apart leaving it looking like it has a gap....it just seems, at least in my copy, that the tab and slots are not sufficient to hold them firmly together at all times...I suppose you can opt to not add the chest cavity parts, but it looks better with them installed...

That's peculiar bc my chest cavity pieces are rock-solid on both of mine.  Perhaps there's a way to modify yours to fit better?

Posted
2 minutes ago, 26662 said:

That's peculiar bc my chest cavity pieces are rock-solid on both of mine.  Perhaps there's a way to modify yours to fit better?

Have pics of how your tabs look both on the cavity pieces and where they connect to the chest piece?

Like I said, it is only an issue once you start handling it and putting the VF-1J into several poses....I need to keep making sure the pieces are correctly connected  

Minor inconvenience I suppose...

Posted
3 hours ago, jvmacross said:

Another annoying aspect of the Three Zero VF-1 is how the chest piece in Battroid does not connect securely to the chest cavity pieces.....with handling, the connection comes apart leaving it looking like it has a gap....it just seems, at least in my copy, that the tab and slots are not sufficient to hold them firmly together at all times...I suppose you can opt to not add the chest cavity parts, but it looks better with them installed...


I was wondering about that too, since many videos also show those cavity fillers being very gappy once puttting the valk in poses.

Not that big issue for me I guess, since I’m currently displaying my Yammies without them anyway.

Posted

Update...on the chest cavilty issue....in order for the chest piece to fit perfectly, there are some tabs (2) that need to go in as far as possible into the slots on a plastic plate that is directly underneath the outer chest piece....I got it as far in as possible and that seemed to have resolved the issue...it still looks like the tabs can go further into the slot, but the way it is now is enough to hold it in place.....once these inner tabs are in correctly...the final 2 tabs will provide a better fit to the outer chest piece...here are the pics of the tabs and slots that work together to get everything perfectly connected....all must be fitted into each other perfectly or the chest piece will keep popping out of the chest cavities....

Inner chest piece slot....there is one for the right side and one for the left...

large.20240702_191758.jpg.d6ec52c962d3c3

 

Tab on chest cavity piece....one on each cavity (left and right)....

large.20240702_191659.jpg.d6d7aa95d727e3

 

Once it is installed properly...it looks like this....it seems to be able to push further into the tab, but did not want to risk breaking anything....either the slot is too small or tab is too big....

large.20240702_212322.jpg.68aa9dcaa8a71a

 

These slots then connect to the final 2 tabs on the chest cavity pieces....

large.20240702_212510.jpg.2bbe237be182c7

 

Tabs on the left and right chest cavity pieces...

large.20240702_212602.jpg.fea40d6806954f

 

Both chest cavity pieces are now fitting much better.....

large.20240702_214502.jpg.11ffaa86a85bd6

large.20240702_214528.jpg.aaa6f4bf89279e

 

Posted
1 hour ago, MKT said:


I was wondering about that too, since many videos also show those cavity fillers being very gappy once puttting the valk in poses.

Not that big issue for me I guess, since I’m currently displaying my Yammies without them anyway.

 

In at least one of the videos that showed excessively gappy side covers, the reviewer didn't seem to have the swingbar armature properly connected to the hip sockets or backplate, so the backplate wasn't fit as closely to the cockpit fuselage as it should have been. It's possible to make the same transformation error on both the Yamarcadia and DX valks, so it seemed like a pretty cut and dried case of mistransformation.

Posted
10 minutes ago, Hiriyu said:

 

In at least one of the videos that showed excessively gappy side covers, the reviewer didn't seem to have the swingbar armature properly connected to the hip sockets or backplate, so the backplate wasn't fit as closely to the cockpit fuselage as it should have been. It's possible to make the same transformation error on both the Yamarcadia and DX valks, so it seemed like a pretty cut and dried case of mistransformation.

On that note: how close are the Yamarcadia and DX valks, designwise? Not sure how much they vary from one another as far as parts shapes and whatnot.

Posted

Finally received mine from Show.Z Store. 🤨

crushedpackage.jpg.4513852ed3affdc897e9c6e22f900844.jpg

Contents of the shipping box were as expected. 😒

crushedbox.jpg.72980a9f33ce3408c3ba0c7dca51018d.jpg

Posted (edited)

At least it had corner protectors on it. :blink:

Wait, those corner protectors should be on the toy box, doh. :fool:

Edited by m0n5t3r
Posted

Post office must have a bone to pick with you, I've never had a show.z store order ravaged like that. When it comes to 3rd party transformers retailers I usually respect their packaging the most

Posted (edited)
On 7/2/2024 at 10:46 AM, Shawn said:

@jenius We are ALL holding you to your word when you do review this item in the future.

image.png.d076855b45373a096fb6c70201681abf.png

Screenshot2024-07-03183155.png.869f33a0eec726bc8d138a0889df1125.pngScreenshot2024-07-03185835.png.e425e3aecc8894416595eb136acf49c2.png

More of the same in this video. 😄

1 hour ago, tekering said:

Finally received mine from Show.Z Store. 🤨

crushedpackage.jpg.4513852ed3affdc897e9c6e22f900844.jpg

Contents of the shipping box were as expected. 😒

crushedbox.jpg.72980a9f33ce3408c3ba0c7dca51018d.jpg

Yikes! 🤔😧

Edited by shazam
Posted
2 hours ago, tekering said:

Finally received mine from Show.Z Store. 🤨

crushedpackage.jpg.4513852ed3affdc897e9c6e22f900844.jpg

Contents of the shipping box were as expected. 😒

crushedbox.jpg.72980a9f33ce3408c3ba0c7dca51018d.jpg


Well that blows. I only ever ordered 1 item from ShowZ some years ago, & if I remember correctly, it came packed inside a styrofoam box then, which is probably the best type of shipping box.

 

6 hours ago, pengbuzz said:

On that note: how close are the Yamarcadia and DX valks, designwise? Not sure how much they vary from one another as far as parts shapes and whatnot.

Well, if talking about sculpt, they are very similar to each other. Jenius’s review of the DX has plenty of comparison pics between both, & there’s even a video detailing the engineering differences.

 

1 hour ago, shazam said:

Screenshot2024-07-03183155.png.869f33a0eec726bc8d138a0889df1125.pngScreenshot2024-07-03185835.png.e425e3aecc8894416595eb136acf49c2.png

More of the same in this video. 😄

Yikes! 🤔😧


Lol let’s see if TZ will revise the manual for the VF-1S release.

Posted
46 minutes ago, MKT said:

Well, if talking about sculpt, they are very similar to each other. Jenius’s review of the DX has plenty of comparison pics between both, & there’s even a video detailing the engineering differences.

I'll check out that video; thanks! :)

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...