Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well, certain artist communities on DeviantArt are about to make serious f*cking bank on this.

The studio?  I suspect not so much.

Posted
48 minutes ago, jvmacross said:

I think I am more interested in Disney's cat people sequel...

Since alternate cuts are all the rage nowadays, I am still waiting for the fabled Cats version where they included CGI anuses on all of the characters for veracity's sake.

Posted
29 minutes ago, Seto Kaiba said:

Since alternate cuts are all the rage nowadays, I am still waiting for the fabled Cats version where they included CGI anuses on all of the characters for veracity's sake.

Errrrr....I'll take a pass.....

Also, I was referring to the Avatar sequel.....please, if that is the franchise you were also referring to.....never speak of it again....

Posted
10 minutes ago, jvmacross said:

Errrrr....I'll take a pass.....

Also, I was referring to the Avatar sequel.....please, if that is the franchise you were also referring to.....never speak of it again....

Ah, my apologies... wrong horrifying CG cat person movie.

Who'd have thought that would become a genre?

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Seto Kaiba said:

Since alternate cuts are all the rage nowadays, I am still waiting for the fabled Cats version where they included CGI anuses on all of the characters for veracity's sake.

That would be a cat-ass-trophy. :D

Edited by pengbuzz
Posted
1 hour ago, Seto Kaiba said:

I am still waiting for the fabled Cats version where they included CGI anuses on all of the characters for veracity's sake.

Y'know... all those creepy CGI cat people in Cats were mostly creepy because they were naked and supposed to be actual cats.  Throw some tights on them, though, and I think they'd actually make pretty passable Thundercats.

Anyhoo, you guys feel free to keep crapping on this news, but until I get more of a reason than "They're making a Thundercats movie, oh noes, muh childhood!" I'm going on record as potentially interested.

Posted
17 minutes ago, mikeszekely said:

Y'know... all those creepy CGI cat people in Cats were mostly creepy because they were naked and supposed to be actual cats.  Throw some tights on them, though, and I think they'd actually make pretty passable Thundercats.

Now there's a question for the philosophers!  Is it more, or less, unsettling if the humanoid cats are wearing spandex overshorts instead of being naked?

At least it's animated, not live action, so we won't have to worry about press commentary about Lion-O's bulge... at least, not until DeviantArt gets ahold of it. :bad:

 

Incidentally, and because this awful thought popped into my head completely unbidden and I feel compelled to ensure that I don't suffer alone...

Does Hostess still make Ho Hos?  They should do a cross-promotion with this movie.  The marketing almost literally writes itself.

 

 

17 minutes ago, mikeszekely said:

Anyhoo, you guys feel free to keep crapping on this news, but until I get more of a reason than "They're making a Thundercats movie, oh noes, muh childhood!" I'm going on record as potentially interested.

Oh, this is just good-natured joking.

The crapping-on will come after we get some key visuals to look at... and someone cleans the litterbox.

Posted

Everyone is talking about how creepy recent cg naked cats are and forget how creepy 2d animated naked cats were in the first episode of the og thundercats.

Posted (edited)

We had had "nakid" 2d animals long before that.  Bugs and Daffy and countless others come to mind.

 

EDIT - and Tom and Sylvester...

Edited by Dynaman

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...