JB0 Posted August 28, 2019 Posted August 28, 2019 Just now, eXis10z said: Are they allowed to buy Sony Pictures? Isn't there some law restricting that purchase out of monopolization fear? I read their Fox deal barely got through . American anti-trust laws are weak as heck. They can totally buy Sony Pictures. There will be a token objection, they'll have to give up some minor division they didn't want anyways, but it'll go through. Quote
eXis10z Posted August 28, 2019 Posted August 28, 2019 I see. Now that Sony is sitting on a golden goose I highly doubt they'll let that go easily. Quote
Old_Nash Posted September 6, 2019 Posted September 6, 2019 (edited) https://variety.com/2019/film/news/spiderman-mcu-sony-pictures-chief-1203324907/ Time for Disney to buy Sony. Edited September 6, 2019 by Old_Nash Quote
Thom Posted September 6, 2019 Posted September 6, 2019 On 9/1/2019 at 12:07 AM, sh9000 said: That's so cooold! But also funny... Quote
Tking22 Posted September 27, 2019 Posted September 27, 2019 HEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE'S BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! https://io9.gizmodo.com/sony-and-marvel-strike-new-deal-to-keep-spider-man-in-t-1838527425 New deal is officially in place between Disney/Marvel and Sony. Holland can and will appear in MCU movies as Peter, and whatever Sony comes up with for it's connected Spider-verse film universe. Quote
Mog Posted September 27, 2019 Posted September 27, 2019 Glad smarter heads prevailed. The MCU writers are either dancing up a storm OR tearing up all those rewrites they did to edit Spidey out of Phase 4. After Far From Home, it was gonna be hard as stink to keep a continuity with Spidey not at the heart of it. Quote
kalvasflam Posted September 27, 2019 Posted September 27, 2019 The funny thing is that given what's happened, Marvel is now going to start figuring out how to push Spiderman to the sidelines, they'll evolve it during the films, but in a way that still contribute to the MCU. And it makes Fantastic Four harder. Can you imagine the next big Spiderman success? Then Sony asks for more money again? Alternatively, Marvel buys out Sony Entertainment to get the rights back and bring all of Marvel home, and then sell Sony Entertainment again. Quote
Kanedas Bike Posted September 27, 2019 Posted September 27, 2019 1 hour ago, sh9000 said: Cool. Pretty much. Part of me wants to say that this was inevitable, but businesses, especially movie studios make some truly bone-headed moves. So Marvel has two movies to work this out, personally I would have preferred a more long term deal, but whatever. -b. Quote
TangledThorns Posted September 27, 2019 Posted September 27, 2019 Amazing what money can do for fans these days. Quote
JB0 Posted September 27, 2019 Posted September 27, 2019 6 hours ago, kalvasflam said: The funny thing is that given what's happened, Marvel is now going to start figuring out how to push Spiderman to the sidelines, they'll evolve it during the films, but in a way that still contribute to the MCU. And it makes Fantastic Four harder. Can you imagine the next big Spiderman success? Then Sony asks for more money again? Alternatively, Marvel buys out Sony Entertainment to get the rights back and bring all of Marvel home, and then sell Sony Entertainment again. Wasn't it Fox that had the FF license? No road bumps there. And my understanding is Disney was asking for more money, not Sony. Quote
kalvasflam Posted September 28, 2019 Posted September 28, 2019 3 hours ago, JB0 said: Wasn't it Fox that had the FF license? No road bumps there. And my understanding is Disney was asking for more money, not Sony. You know what... you are right on both counts. Great points. I stand corrected Quote
Keith Posted September 28, 2019 Posted September 28, 2019 The solution is now simple. They have 2 films to: - Have Peter lose his powers. - Be Adopted by Pepper & change his name to "Peter Stark." - Become the new Iron Man. Quote
Keith Posted September 29, 2019 Posted September 29, 2019 4 hours ago, Thom said: Does he lose Aunt May too..!? Nah, she marry's happy and changes her name to June. MJ reveals she's related to Nick Fury, and changes her name to "MF." Quote
Graham Posted September 30, 2019 Posted September 30, 2019 On 9/28/2019 at 12:50 AM, kalvasflam said: The funny thing is that given what's happened, Marvel is now going to start figuring out how to push Spiderman to the sidelines, they'll evolve it during the films, but in a way that still contribute to the MCU. And it makes Fantastic Four harder. Can you imagine the next big Spiderman success? Then Sony asks for more money again? Alternatively, Marvel buys out Sony Entertainment to get the rights back and bring all of Marvel home, and then sell Sony Entertainment again. Personally, I don't think Fantastic Four will ever be a big success as a live-action movie. We've had two failed, disastrous attempts already. I just don't think the characters are interesting or likable enough for a mainstream movie franchise. Quote
Thom Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 On 9/29/2019 at 2:21 PM, Keith said: Nah, she marry's happy and changes her name to June. MJ reveals she's related to Nick Fury, and changes her name to "MF." Wow, that's a relief! Thanks. Quote
kalvasflam Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 19 hours ago, Graham said: Personally, I don't think Fantastic Four will ever be a big success as a live-action movie. We've had two failed, disastrous attempts already. I just don't think the characters are interesting or likable enough for a mainstream movie franchise. Admittedly the first one with Jessica Alba wasn't all bad. Well, mainly, Alba wasn't all bad, the rest were meh.... Quote
JB0 Posted October 1, 2019 Posted October 1, 2019 20 hours ago, Graham said: Personally, I don't think Fantastic Four will ever be a big success as a live-action movie. We've had two failed, disastrous attempts already. I just don't think the characters are interesting or likable enough for a mainstream movie franchise. Three attempts. The first movie got a sequel involving Galactus and the Silver Surfer. The first movie wasn't great, but wasn't AWFUL either. The second movie and the "new" continuity movie were both trainwrecks made by people that hate fun. But really, the biggest problem the Fantastic Four have in the modern movie environment is that they're kinda "been there, done that". Their powers aren't anything exciting, the idea of a team isn't anything exciting, and any drama they write will ALSO not be anything exciting, because it has all been done in other hero movies in recent history. That their comics predate most of the other characters in the Marvel movies doesn't matter to the public. They're going to be seen as "budget-rate Avengers with a talking rock and a gender-bent version of the mom from The Incredibles." Quote
sh9000 Posted October 2, 2020 Author Posted October 2, 2020 https://people.com/movies/jamie-foxx-in-talks-reprise-electro-role-upcoming-spider-man-sequel/ Quote
Wolf-1 Posted October 2, 2020 Posted October 2, 2020 On 10/1/2019 at 12:24 AM, JB0 said: Three attempts. The first movie got a sequel involving Galactus and the Silver Surfer. The first movie wasn't great, but wasn't AWFUL either. The second movie and the "new" continuity movie were both trainwrecks made by people that hate fun. Technically, there is a 4th F.F. film out there. Made in the early-mid 90's with the young man from "Boy Who Could Fly" as Johnny Storm. There's a documentary playing on Prime or Hulu that goes over it. Was never officially released but apparently there are bootlegs out there of it, typically found at the various conventions. Interesting view of how the shady side of Hollywood actually works or preview to what an actual "won't mention" movie shoot would most likely be like. Quote
Dynaman Posted October 2, 2020 Posted October 2, 2020 That first one is an example of how far a studio will go to keep movie options in their control. Quote
sh9000 Posted October 31, 2020 Author Posted October 31, 2020 https://screenrant.com/spiderman-3-jacob-batalon-weight-loss-photo-ned Quote
tekering Posted November 1, 2020 Posted November 1, 2020 6 hours ago, sh9000 said: https://screenrant.com/spiderman-3-jacob-batalon-weight-loss-photo-ned Whoah... Ned and Betty were a married couple in the comics? Quote
Mog Posted November 1, 2020 Posted November 1, 2020 If I'm remembering correctly, Spoiler Ned was also the original Hobgoblin. Figuring out Hobgoblin's secret identity was one of the bigger mysteries at that time in the Spider-Man comics. But good on Jacob the actor dropping that weight. On a somewhat tangent, is there any way to input spoiler codes on the mobile version of the boards? The old BB code shortcuts don't seem to work anymore. Can do them from my laptop, but not when I'm on my cell phone. Quote
sh9000 Posted December 4, 2020 Author Posted December 4, 2020 https://comicbook.com/movies/news/spider-man-3-sony-appears-tease-tom-holland-crossover-tobey-maguire-andrew-garfield-spider-verse-multiverse/ Quote
sh9000 Posted December 9, 2020 Author Posted December 9, 2020 https://people.com/movies/alfred-molina-set-to-reprise-doc-ock-role-from-2004-in-latest-spider-man-franchise-report/ Quote
sh9000 Posted December 9, 2020 Author Posted December 9, 2020 (edited) https://screenrant.com/spiderman-3-cast-tobey-maguire-kirsten-dunst-mcu/ https://screenrant.com/mcus-spider-man-3-reportedly-bringing-back-andrew-garfield-for-spider-verse Edited December 9, 2020 by sh9000 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.