Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

https://twinfinite.net/2018/12/ace-combat-7-screenshots-multiplayer/?state=changed3241&gid=1&pid=1

Very ACI-like, which isn't surprising. I do hope they add a PvE raid mode in later, that was probably the best part of Infinity. Some of the later special raids from Infinity were nuts (Gold Excalibur turning into a 3D bullet hell level was something to see, even if it made the game crawl into 20 fps).

Posted
1 hour ago, dizman said:

 

I don't like the look of the missile containers mounted on the wing pylons, shame they couldn't be mounted ventrally.

I sorta like that contrast between old airframe and high tech weaponry.

Posted

Strange, since it listed different deadlines for different bonuses.  I had decided a few weeks ago to pass on that version though, as reading carefully, I don't think it came with much (any?) of the DLC.  I think for the same money, the 'season pass' versions etc will give more value. 

Posted
On 12/15/2018 at 7:55 PM, kajnrig said:

"Aces at War Bundle" no longer shows up. :( I was gonna place a preorder this weekend.

https://www.bandainamcoentstore.com/product/523300/ace-combat-7-skies-unknown-aces-at-war-bundle-playstation-4

Aces at War is back up but not for pre order, it has a waiting list link so if you still want the artbook that's your best chance for now.

On 12/15/2018 at 8:44 PM, David Hingtgen said:

Strange, since it listed different deadlines for different bonuses.  I had decided a few weeks ago to pass on that version though, as reading carefully, I don't think it came with much (any?) of the DLC.  I think for the same money, the 'season pass' versions etc will give more value. 

Looks like they finally updated the page with what DLC it will come with and looks like it's the same F-4/ 3 aircraft skins/ AC5 or 6 that you get with a regular pre order.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Although, that line about the Eagle pulling "30 g's" seems pretty weird. I would think that Katabuchi or Kono would know enough about airplanes to know how ridiculous that number is. Is it just an error on the part of the translators?

Posted

It's odd wording for sure. Mostly I think it's meant to imply how sharply they're maneuvering. As long as the 30 g's aren't sustained forces, I'd think they're survivable. John Stapp, renowned historical crash test dummy, survived a maximum 46-g test, and estimated the human body can survive even greater numbers.

The dialogue before and after, as well as the visuals, don't help it much, though.

Posted

From what some people on reddit are saying, apparently its just the TL team taking some liberties with the script. The original japanese dub just says that "the drone gets to pull as many G's as it likes".

Posted

If you're talking about drones, no, normal G-limits for pilots obviously don't apply.  Aircraft are able to pull far more strenuous maneuvers than pilots would be able to do physically and remain conscious/healthy.

Thirty Gs sounds like a ton, and most aircraft probably aren't meant to experience those stresses for any long period of time.  If anything, the airframe would probably be stricken from flight status afterward, and relegated to a static display.  Even minor envelope excursions generally require an aircraft be grounded afterward for a structural integrity check.  Just because an aircraft is built to survive heavy G-loading doesn't mean it's meant to operate at that level continuously.

Posted

A concept someone at L-M did as a way the F-22’s weapon load could be increased without hurting stealth too much. They also appear on the Silent Eagle concept and the Super Hornet III. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, Sildani said:

A concept someone at L-M did as a way the F-22’s weapon load could be increased without hurting stealth too much. They also appear on the Silent Eagle concept and the Super Hornet III. 

I think I've seen some Hidetaka Tenjin paintings of VF-0's equipped with a similar stealth ordnance container too.

Posted
43 minutes ago, AN/ALQ128 said:

I think I've seen some Hidetaka Tenjin paintings of VF-0's equipped with a similar stealth ordnance container too.

Yup the VF-0 had those for the final battle. 

__ghost_drone_kudou_shin_qf_2001_roy_foc

Posted

Ah, I see. I had assumed some such thing MUST have been at least conceptualized for the Raptor by now, if not downright made. I'm gonna have to go back through the other trailers and see if they just reuse it for the other pod designs, too, or if those are unique. I'd imagine if it just clamps onto a hardpoint, it'd be pretty interchangeable.

...or actually, those of you with the know-how, are mounting points the same across the different fighters? Or are there different brackets for putting, say, an AMRAAM on an F-22 versus an F-16?

Posted
2 hours ago, F-ZeroOne said:

Theres a 30 second "Ace Combat 7" trailer doing the rounds on some gaming sites and its blink-and-you'll-miss-it but I think I saw a Su-57 in there at one point.

This the one? Just saw it on Youtube.

 

Posted
9 hours ago, kajnrig said:

Ah, I see. I had assumed some such thing MUST have been at least conceptualized for the Raptor by now, if not downright made. I'm gonna have to go back through the other trailers and see if they just reuse it for the other pod designs, too, or if those are unique. I'd imagine if it just clamps onto a hardpoint, it'd be pretty interchangeable.

...or actually, those of you with the know-how, are mounting points the same across the different fighters? Or are there different brackets for putting, say, an AMRAAM on an F-22 versus an F-16?

Air-to-Air missiles usually have fairly unique rails/adapters for each plane.  But anything else is pretty universal.  

Posted

Hugely looking forward to this. Had to come back here and post as it was this forum that kicked off my love of AC in the first place back in the heady days of AC5... 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...