Ignacio Ocamica Posted July 30, 2017 Posted July 30, 2017 Pictures of a prototype/test shot. Please? Quote
dizman Posted July 30, 2017 Posted July 30, 2017 Pics from the deculture shock podcast page http://www.decultureshock.com/wonder-festival-2017-summer/ Quote
Dobber Posted July 30, 2017 Posted July 30, 2017 On 2/19/2017 at 2:22 AM, spanner said: hehe! but not on absolutely everything but it works so well on certain odd ball planes. For example, I wanna get my hands on a Spitfire kit and have it painted up in the former Soviet colors as they used in WW2. On 2/19/2017 at 2:30 AM, seti88 said: haha i hear ya! But the SV51 is definitely a good candidate for a ruskie star...and maybe on these too..lol...ok gonna come down from my russian star high now.. On 2/19/2017 at 3:45 AM, Garfinkel said: Its gonna be more crisp and less floppy and a joy to own. Until the legs fall off....... Absolutely going to preorder one and then repaint my Yamato ones in Soviet colours. Sort of did it years ago Quote
Sandman Posted July 30, 2017 Posted July 30, 2017 This is probably why Arcadia has been bumping up the reissues this year. The Sv-51 is probably a long ways off still. Quote
technoblue Posted July 30, 2017 Posted July 30, 2017 That makes sense. I hope they do take their time to make the updated SV-51 as good as it can be. No QC issues, please. Quote
funkymonkeyjavajunky Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 (edited) At least the renders show correct armaments (two cannons and two missiles, not four cannons). Edited July 31, 2017 by funkymonkeyjavajunky Quote
anime52k8 Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 (edited) But I want it NOW! Edited July 31, 2017 by anime52k8 Quote
505thAirborne Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 3 hours ago, anime52k8 said: But I want it NOW! Quote
Chronocidal Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 They're going to have to make a lot of improvements to get me to buy another set, I think. My originals are just fine as after I did some work to tighten the wing hinges. The lift fan is at least an interesting thing, but I put that at the same level as the airbrake on the 1/48th VF-1 on the "unnecessary detail" scale. Quote
sh9000 Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 I still have the Yamato SV-51 Ivanov, Nora, and CF unopened. I think I'll pass on Arcadia's. Quote
M'Kyuun Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 I still have my Ivanov on display. I'll wait to see what improvements are made over Yamato's before I commit to a second. For starters, hopefully ratcheted hip joints and better weapon mounts. I never could get the FAST packs to attach to my 51's wings. Quote
Slave IV Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 I'll get this when it comes, no rush. Actually Arcadia, please take your sweet time since I have plenty I need to buy from you in the near future. Quote
Mommar Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 14 hours ago, funkymonkeyjavajunky said: At least the renders show correct armaments (two cannons and two missiles, not four cannons). Four Cannons? Quote
505thAirborne Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 44 minutes ago, Mommar said: Four Cannons? He meant to say Missile/rocket pods. Quote
Chronocidal Posted July 31, 2017 Posted July 31, 2017 (edited) The Sv-51 was shown mounting both two and four pods, at various points in the series. On the other hand, the tan one was only supposed to have one cannon mounted in the intake fairings, but since the D.D. and Nora molds used two, the CF got a free upgrade. Edited July 31, 2017 by Chronocidal Quote
funkymonkeyjavajunky Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 12 hours ago, 505thAirborne said: He meant to say Missile/rocket pods. Correction: Micro-Missile Launchers (http://macross.wikia.com/wiki/SV-51) Quote
505thAirborne Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 10 minutes ago, funkymonkeyjavajunky said: Correction: Micro-Missile Launchers (http://macross.wikia.com/wiki/SV-51) I was close. Quote
David Hingtgen Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 Corrected correction: drop tanks with micro-missile launchers built in. They are shaped very much like the F-5's tip-tanks. Quote
Sildani Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 Can we please go back to being annoyed that this is still only in renders now? Quote
anime52k8 Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 1 hour ago, Sildani said: Can we please go back to being annoyed that this is still only in renders now? I think we should get a jump on things and start complaining about the premium finish version. Quote
wmkjr Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 3 hours ago, anime52k8 said: I think we should get a jump on things and start complaining about the premium finish version. Looks like the color for the canopy is not anime accurate. PO cancelled. Quote
seti88 Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 3 hours ago, anime52k8 said: I think we should get a jump on things and start complaining about the premium finish version. so we will hit the same decision point again come preorder day..should we wait for a premium version? Quote
no3Ljm Posted August 1, 2017 Posted August 1, 2017 Thinking if I should order two of this, if ever. I have a feeling this will look good on a Kei Nagase Ace Combat scheme. Quote
valhary Posted August 3, 2017 Posted August 3, 2017 I hope arcadia make a micro site to follow the development of this bird as did with the yf 19 http://arcadia.ac/yf19/diary/05/index.php Quote
no3Ljm Posted August 3, 2017 Posted August 3, 2017 17 minutes ago, valhary said: I hope arcadia make a micro site to follow the development of this bird as did with the yf 19 http://arcadia.ac/yf19/diary/05/index.php I agree. Would be nice to have that. But since I can't understand the whole Japanese texts on the micro site or even the blog update, I rather prefer photo updates instead. I'm sure a lot of people here will agree and prefers photos than texts. Quote
Chronocidal Posted August 3, 2017 Posted August 3, 2017 I am hoping they'll highlight the improvements over the old mold, because I'm actually curious what the demand for this will be like. Much like the VF-0, barring any structural improvements, the only thing to really improve visually is the molding quality, and finer details. With the VF-0, we got the VF-0D first, so I feel like the new VF-0A/S were more a byproduct of that. The Sv-51 probably needs some posability and playability improvements (tighter joints, better mechanisms, that sort of thing), but from a display perspective? I'd be hard pressed to tell the difference between the old and new VF-0s displayed on a shelf, and I feel like this is going to be the exact same way. Quote
Sildani Posted August 3, 2017 Posted August 3, 2017 Wouldn't that mean they got the shapes and general proportions right the first time then? Quote
anime52k8 Posted August 3, 2017 Posted August 3, 2017 (edited) 45 minutes ago, Sildani said: Wouldn't that mean they got the shapes and general proportions right the first time then? Yes they did, but that's about all you can say positive about the current SV-51 toy. If you're looking at it from ten feet away it looks fine enough but if you actually get within arms reach of the thing it's just a mess of massive panel gaps and crude surface detailing. More importantly though, The articulation on the SV-51 sucks; nothing locks together properly in any mode; and the whole thing is just a big, floppy mess. Edited August 3, 2017 by anime52k8 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.