charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Let's share real world technical references of Macross variable aircrafts that we noticed I'm going to start with an oddball VA-3 Intruder Silhouette inspiration: A-6E Split feet design inspiration: H.S. Buccaneer S2B Quote
charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Semi-recessed long range missiles (mounted on engine nacelles and ventral fuselage) of VF-4G Semi-recessed missiles of F-4 BVRAAM missiles of Eurofighter Typhoon Edited February 15, 2014 by charger69 Quote
charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) YF-21/VF-22 Thrust Vectoring (3 Vane Design) NASA Research F-18 HARV (3 Vane Design) X-31 Thrust Vectoring (3 Vane Design) Edited February 14, 2014 by charger69 Quote
charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 LVT Avenger II Attack Aircraft British Aircraft Corporation TSR 2 (General Silhouette) Quote
Mr March Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Oh, these are pretty cool. I didn't know a 3-vane thrust vectored engine existed in real life. That's so strange, all these years of looking at aircraft books, photos, air shows and museums and this is the first time I've seen it. Very cool! I don't know if "reference" applies to the VF-4 Lightning III example, since I doubt very much Kawamori would have access to the Eurofighter Typhoon mere months after design had only begun so that he could be inspired to work on the VF-4. Perhaps there are older fighters with recessed missiles? The TIAS Macross Plus book makes mention that the YF-21 and YF-19 were also partly inspired by the YF-22 Raptor and the YF-23 Black Widow II. The YF-19 forward-swept wing was also partly inspired by the Grumman X-29. Quote
charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Mr. March A more historically correct reference for VF-4G might be Russian Air Force MiG-31BM Foxhound (showing off the four semi- recessed missile hardpoints) Also F-4 Yes, the Typhoon did come to mind, as being among the newest planes with conformal carriage. I've always thought the forward troughs of the Tornado were a great example--they're among the "deepest" I can think of. (a Tornado's rear ones are not recessed)::edit:: And here's a good one showing an F-4's: Edited February 14, 2014 by charger69 Quote
charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Some obvious ones YF-29 (VTOL with tilting engine pods) VF-25F Tornado Messiah (VTOL with tilting engine pods) New references thanks to Graham EWR VJ 101 (German, Heinkel+Messerschmitt+Bölkow joint venture) BELL XF-109 CV22 Osprey (VTOL with Tiltrotor) Edited February 15, 2014 by charger69 Quote
charger69 Posted February 14, 2014 Author Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Some obvious ones VF-17 VF-171 F-117 From VF5SS's post http://www.macrossworld.com/mwf/index.php?showtopic=38605&p=1026377 VF-17Nightmare (Stealth Valkyrie) Interviewer: In the rough drafts of the VF-17, did youstray far from the F-117? Kawamori: It had a more traditional fighter shape atfirst.... No, I didn't like the F-117 at first. (laugh) It had a shape that I refused to use. But when I went to the U.S. and saw the realplane, I thought, "Well, it flies. Nothing I can do about it." (laugh) Interviewer:You didn't think it would fly, at first? (laugh) Kawamori: It's ugly, isn't it? I couldn't stand seeing one flying alongsidean F-15. But the F-117 also seemedfuturistic, or the times were changing, and I came to like the shape of theF-117. I didn't like it, but I was like"I was wrong, I'm sorry". Andso I decided that it would make a good 'character'. I'm glad I took a defiant attitude about theVF-17. Interviewer: Also, its Battroid mode has a heavily armoredlook that was never seen before. Kawamori: Since most Valkyries become thin anyway, Ithink that is a merit in this clearly different type. I think it might have been better to put theVF-17 in Macross Plus as a series of work. Interviewer: It seems strange, though. It has the form of an airplane that alreadyexists. Kawamori: It's embarrassing, but I couldn't expect thatto happen with only the F-117. I could beconvinced until the F-23. But when theF-117 was done, I was like, "What happened?" (laugh) Interviewer: How did you feel about that sudden onset ofreality? I think when someone isdesigning sci-fi works, he can have the self-confidence of going ahead andborrowing from reality. Kawamori: The one I thought I really couldn't surpasswas B-2 Stealth Bomber. The B-2 isreally great looking. I even thought Imight stop designing after seeing it fly. "It's so simple, it has so few lines, and yet so muchcharacter. I could never come close toit." (laugh) It's the one realdesign I cannot surpass. Interviewer: And to think it came from a company thatmakes real planes. (laugh) Kawamori: I'd be reluctant to answer if I was askedwhether I like the F-117 now. But I'mmore close to the point that I was convinced. Maneuverability is not so good,when I asked a pilot "How about the maneuverability of this lookingbody?", then the pilot said to me " It's alright, because it carries4 computers" (laugh) Interviewer: And if one computer fails, it'll drop like abrick. Kawamori:That's right (laugh) Interviewer:And an impression is considerably different although it is a remodeled VF-17Twith the double seats and is a minor change. Kawamori: The body is just about as good as the realthing, but it becomes quite different by making even a small change. But it wouldn't look like we changed it muchif we did it in a very manga-like or anime-like way. The design near a real plane could affectvery much with the slight difference. It is an interesting part. Edited February 14, 2014 by charger69 Quote
frothymug Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 Oh, these are pretty cool. I didn't know a 3-vane thrust vectored engine existed in real life. That's so strange, all these years of looking at aircraft books, photos, air shows and museums and this is the first time I've seen it. Very cool! I don't know if "reference" applies to the VF-4 Lightning III example, since I doubt very much Kawamori would have access to the Eurofighter Typhoon mere months after design had only begun so that he could be inspired to work on the VF-4. Perhaps there are older fighters with recessed missiles? The TIAS Macross Plus book makes mention that the YF-21 and YF-19 were also partly inspired by the YF-22 Raptor and the YF-23 Black Widow II. The YF-19 forward-swept wing was also partly inspired by the Grumman X-29. The main reason that 3-dimensional thrust vectoring isn't used much is that it adds more complexity and weight to an aircraft, with very little return on maneuverability over 2-dimensional TVC. I can see it working out great for non-atmospheric maneuvers, though. We also don't see forward-swept wings much because of the aeroelasticity issues it has. All it needs to become feasible is to produce a wing with composite grains in the appropriate directions so that when the wing undergoes loading, it flexes in a way that doesn't destroy the behavior of the flow over the wing at reasonable angle of attack. IIRC, the story of Macross Plus was inspired by the ATF competition. The designs were pretty unique from their real-world counterparts. Oh, and I'd bet that Kawamori doesn't really like the F-117 because it was essentially designed by electrical engineers, not aerospace engineers. Quote
Vifam7 Posted February 14, 2014 Posted February 14, 2014 (edited) Semi-recessed long range missiles (moun I don't know if "reference" applies to the VF-4 Lightning III example, since I doubt very much Kawamori would have access to the Eurofighter Typhoon mere months after design had only begun so that he could be inspired to work on the VF-4. Perhaps there are older fighters with recessed missiles? The F-4 Phantom had semi-recessed missiles. The design of the VF-4 was perhaps inspired by this McDonnell Douglas concept. Edited February 14, 2014 by Vifam7 Quote
sketchley Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 The VF-4 is based off of the SR-71. Didn't you guys read my translation of an article about this? http://nomansland.site.nfoservers.com/MRG-Active-Archive/forums/index.php?topic=2385.msg35718#msg35718 From Pg 092. Quote
Graham Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 I think the Tornado Pack and YF-29 were more obviously inspired by the Bell XF-109 (which unfortunately never made it past the mock-up stage), rather than the Osprey. Graham Quote
Falcon Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 LVT Avenger II Attack Aircraft British Aircraft Corporation TSR 2 (General Silhouette) Think the Su-25 Frogfoot is a better comparison. Quote
Graham Posted February 15, 2014 Posted February 15, 2014 As Kawamori's VF-4 Lightning design pre-dates the Eurofighter Typhoon by many years, it's more likely that Kawamori got the inspiration for the VF-4's semi-recessed missiles from the F-4 Phantom, which IIRC was the first fighter to feature carriage of semi-recessed missiles. Graham Quote
charger69 Posted February 15, 2014 Author Posted February 15, 2014 Think the Su-25 Frogfoot is a better comparison. Oh, I totally miss that plane! I see the big ressemblance with Su-25 However, I was trying more to reference at wing position (High Mounted) of LVT Avenger II. (Su-25 is a high-mounted too) Quote
charger69 Posted February 15, 2014 Author Posted February 15, 2014 (edited) Off-beat for Saturday Fun Mylene's Sports Car 1966 Bizzarini P538 Spyder Prototype Ferrari 330 P 3/4 can be a candidate too Edited February 15, 2014 by charger69 Quote
charger69 Posted February 17, 2014 Author Posted February 17, 2014 (edited) YF-30 Chronos ATF (F-22) Design Concepts Vought F7U Cutlass (Tail-on-Wing Design) Edited February 17, 2014 by charger69 Quote
Retracting Head Ter Ter Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 What?!? None of you noticed that the VF-1 resembles an F14?!?!?! Quote
CrazyDude Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Why state the obvious? Common knowledge since it aired. Quote
Retracting Head Ter Ter Posted March 2, 2014 Posted March 2, 2014 Why state the obvious? Common knowledge since it aired. I was erm, you know, being sarcastic there... Quote
charger69 Posted March 4, 2014 Author Posted March 4, 2014 (edited) Thanks to ChronocidalYF-25 SchemeYF-16 Scheme Edited March 5, 2014 by charger69 Quote
Mr March Posted March 4, 2014 Posted March 4, 2014 Oh yeah, that is definitely a major influence on the Durandal. Great color scheme. Now that I'm getting close to owning proper high res scans and finalized many colored versions of all the Valkyrie line art, I'd love to dive into some custom work using some of these schemes like the YF-16. Or maybe even color the VF-1A Valkyrie using the YF-29 Durandal colors, kinda like Macross The First Quote
charger69 Posted March 5, 2014 Author Posted March 5, 2014 (edited) Beatrice 8x8 Armoured Fighting Vehicle (Macross Frontier) B1 Centauro (Thanks to Mr. March) USMC LAV-25 Light Assault Vehicle (Kind of) Edited March 5, 2014 by charger69 Quote
Mr March Posted March 5, 2014 Posted March 5, 2014 I initially thought the Beatrice was a variation of the Stryker Mobile Gun, but I was informed by another Macross fan a year or so back that the Beatrice most closely resembles the Italian B1 Centauro tank destroyer. The Beatrice's armament is similar and the appearance of the Beatrice matches the Centauro more than most other wheeled LAVs or Tank Destroyers I've seen, right down to details like the ports and features like the angular armor on the forward section of the main turret. Quote
VF-15 Banshee Posted March 10, 2014 Posted March 10, 2014 We all know and love the VF-1 Valkyrie and there was also a real life Valkyrie: North American Aviation XB-70 Valkyrie Quote
charger69 Posted March 10, 2014 Author Posted March 10, 2014 Siokorvsky Comanchero Attack Helicopter (SDF TV: Episode 20) Mi-24 Hind Quote
PetarB Posted March 13, 2014 Posted March 13, 2014 Love this thread!!! IMHO, some of the references are a bit off-base though! For example the second ATF (F-22) design is quite close to MIM-31 Karyovin. I've never seen those mockups before, they are very cool! The intakes and layout of the outrider engines on the Bell XF-109 are very similar to the layout and intakes of the engines on the VF-4. The VF-4 is based off of the SR-71.Didn't you guys read my translation of an article about this? http://nomansland.site.nfoservers.com/MRG-Active-Archive/forums/index.php?topic=2385.msg35718#msg35718From Pg 092. The interviewee states the VF-4 is reminiscent of the SR-71 but there didn't seem to be notes by the Kawamori Shoji with his inspirations for the design, unless I missed something…. The Grumman X-29 is also very reminiscent of the VF-9 Cutlass. Quote
Cdr Fokker Posted March 13, 2014 Posted March 13, 2014 We all know and love the VF-1 Valkyrie and there was also a real life Valkyrie: North American Aviation XB-70 Valkyrie Which is where the VF-1 actually gets its name. (And there's a model of it in Hikaru's quarters in DYRL, too.) Quote
Gubaba Posted March 13, 2014 Posted March 13, 2014 Which is where the VF-1 actually gets its name. (And there's a model of it in Hikaru's quarters in DYRL, too.) And in Zeta Gundam, for some reason... Quote
antibiotictab Posted March 13, 2014 Posted March 13, 2014 (edited) Not the Variable fighters, but I was so impressed by those things below in the Macross World in the 80's. Roomba. And digital photo frames. This one is almost 100% the same thing as the one which appeared in Flashback 2012. Edited March 13, 2014 by antibiotictab Quote
PetarB Posted March 14, 2014 Posted March 14, 2014 Nice catch. When I watch Harry Potter and they have these animated newspapers…. we actually already have that technology available. It's just not distributed. I have digital photo frames in my house. They rock. Quote
charger69 Posted January 28, 2015 Author Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) Return from certain death! Major similarities with Pantsir-S1: 1) In the centre the EHF phased-array tracking radar. 2) Two (in Maverick's case one) twin-barrel 2A38M automatic anti-aircraft guns 3) 12 (in Maverick's case six )ready to launch missile-containers each containing one 57E6-E command guided surface to air missile SDR-04-MkXV Destroid Maverick (Thanks to jvmacross!) Russian Pantsir-S1 (anti-aircraft artillery) on a tracked GM-352 chassis Edited January 28, 2015 by charger69 Quote
Mr March Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 Definitely seeing the inspiration for this Destroid type here. Nicely done. Quote
Zinjo Posted January 28, 2015 Posted January 28, 2015 (edited) Siokorvsky Comanchero Attack Helicopter (SDF TV: Episode 20) Mi-24 Hind Never liked that design. Always thought the RAH-66 Comanche was a better design than this. Unfortunately at the time, the Comanche was still in early development in 1982. Edited January 28, 2015 by Zinjo Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.