Duke Togo Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 (edited) No it's as if the chinese makes a movie about Abe and casts one of their gameshow comedians with the rest of the characters an electic mix of westerners, mexicans and swedes. And this chinese Abe is a cowboy to boot, washed up on the west coast due to storms and freeing slaves on his way to Washington. His real name? General Tsao. Honestly... That's frakking brilliant. I'd pay to see that movie. Edited July 29, 2013 by Duke Togo Quote
PetarB Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 (edited) Whilst I am familiar with the source material, I'm not as unhappy as some with the fantasy elements. Go with me. What if I told you, during World War Two, that the God of the Nordic cycle were behind one of Hitler's henchmen - responsible for millions of deaths of jews, gypsies and homosexuals. Then the US created an 'ubermensch' of their own to combat this Nazi evil by injecting super-steroids and exposure to radiation. Then, instead of shutting down horrific places like Auschwitz and Daschau - the said 'ubermensch' pursues a personal vendetta against a psychotic but ineffectual victim of medicine and this is glorified as the main plot of the movie. Are you there yet? Captain America (2011). So this fantasy retelling of the 47 Ronin story to me isn't too far from some other historical treatments of Hollywood. I'm not making judgements - I loved Captain America - I"m just saying sometimes you have to let realism go and enjoy the ride you're being taken on. Edited July 28, 2013 by PetarB Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted July 28, 2013 Posted July 28, 2013 But Peter, this does not take place in a time and place that has white people, therefore we must call it racist/oriental/shoehorning/(insert color here)face and such! Quote
EXO Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 But Captain America isn't a historical figure... It's more like giving Patton a mask and a shield and he goes out to fight a Hitler with no skin on his head. That's just silly... how can you tell that it's Hitler if there's no skin for his mustache to attach to. Quote
Valkyrie addict Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Honestly... That's frakking brilliant. If pay to see that movie. million times more original than the crap Hollywood keeps doing. Quote
peter Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 But Peter, this does not take place in a time and place that has white people, therefore we must call it racist/oriental/shoehorning/(insert color here)face and such! It probably wouldn't sell without at least one white guy in the film.....sorta like the Last Samurai, haha! Quote
Gakken85 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Looks really predictable and bland.. but entertaining. Quote
Duke Togo Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Looks really predictable and bland.. but entertaining. Predict, and we'll tell you if you're right. Quote
EXO Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 It probably wouldn't sell without at least one white guy in the film.....sorta like the Last Samurai, haha! That's true, but only because the studios don't bank on asian leading parts/purely asian casts and non A-list actors. They just won't put the money in advertising it. But if you compare Crouching Tiger to Last Samurai... Crouching Tiger is a lot more successful based on percentage of profit domestically (USA). Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was made for $17 million and made $217 million worldwide (13x production budget), 60% of that was domestic. Last Samurai's budget was $140 million and made $456 million (3.25x production), only 25% was domestic. Remember also that CT/HD was released as an arthouse movie released in 16 theaters with barely any ads and wasn't widely released until it showed sellout performances. Last Samurai was released in 3000 theaters in the US and was highly publicized with Tom Cruise's name attached. It's again Hollywood Studio's shortsightedness that keeps stories that have a worldwide appeal from being released with the giant budget it needs. Quote
Gakken85 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Well, lets see... Keanu is chosen one who can do things everybody else can't, for some reason. (Until the sequel and the invent a foil) And a small group of likeable semi-rebels facing impossible odds, who somehow win out anyway. Lots of short hand references to Gladiator and 300. Throw in some cheap crappy romance for good measure. I think the most interesting aspect here is the fantasy creatures, which could make or break things. If the CGI is top-shelf It will be fun. I'll probably catch it on video. Quote
Duke Togo Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Well, lets see... Keanu is chosen one who can do things everybody else can't, for some reason. (Until the sequel and the invent a foil) The nature of the story precludes the possibility of a sequel. Quote
peter Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 That's true, but only because the studios don't bank on asian leading parts/purely asian casts and non A-list actors. They just won't put the money in advertising it. But if you compare Crouching Tiger to Last Samurai... Crouching Tiger is a lot more successful based on percentage of profit domestically (USA). Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon was made for $17 million and made $217 million worldwide (13x production budget), 60% of that was domestic. Last Samurai's budget was $140 million and made $456 million (3.25x production), only 25% was domestic. Remember also that CT/HD was released as an arthouse movie released in 16 theaters with barely any ads and wasn't widely released until it showed sellout performances. Last Samurai was released in 3000 theaters in the US and was highly publicized with Tom Cruise's name attached. It's again Hollywood Studio's shortsightedness that keeps stories that have a worldwide appeal from being released with the giant budget it needs. Good points. Anyway, like I said, I'd probably still watch this....maybe not the sequels though......48 Ronin - Reloaded, 49 Ronin - Revolutions.... Quote
Gakken85 Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 The nature of the story precludes the possibility of a sequel. Which they aren't even remotely staying true to. Quote
Duke Togo Posted July 29, 2013 Posted July 29, 2013 Which they aren't even remotely staying true to. Then why even call it 47 Ronin? Not sticking to the "ending" invalidates the power and meaning of the story. Quote
EXO Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 Good points. Anyway, like I said, I'd probably still watch this....maybe not the sequels though......48 Ronin - Reloaded, 49 Ronin - Revolutions.... Haha! Nice titles... ...these are not the 47 Ronin you are looking for... You can go about your business... move along... Quote
peter Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 Haha! Nice titles... ...these are not the 47 Ronin you are looking for... You can go about your business... move along... Right? I swear I saw a greeen lightsaber in the trailer. Also had a feeling of Lord of the Rings as well as Pirates of the Carribean. I wonder if Kira is going to be a decrepit old man, or some Mortal Kombat-type boss. Quote
Noyhauser Posted July 30, 2013 Posted July 30, 2013 But Captain America isn't a historical figure... It's more like giving Patton a mask and a shield and he goes out to fight a Hitler with no skin on his head. That's just silly... how can you tell that it's Hitler if there's no skin for his mustache to attach to. What's funny is that this is basically the plot of every Japanese historical movie save for the Taiga dramas. The Japanese have no problem whatsoever raping their history for plot fodder. I'm reminded of a recent Destroy All Podcasts discussion of Shogun Assassin, which I'm paraphrasing: "It like if John Adams and George Washington hired a bunch of elite assassins to kill each other." Quote
EXO Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 What's funny is that this is basically the plot of every Japanese historical movie save for the Taiga dramas. The Japanese have no problem whatsoever raping their history for plot fodder. I'm reminded of a recent Destroy All Podcasts discussion of Shogun Assassin, which I'm paraphrasing: "It like if John Adams and George Washington hired a bunch of elite assassins to kill each other." I'm not an expert on historical based Japanese dramas and how the their handled in Japanese media, so this isn't a counter point. What you're saying is probably totally true. But using Shogun Assassin as an example... SA is a story based on a manga and 47 Ronin is a legend based on a true event in Japanese history (right?). People still visit the grave site where the bodies are suppose to be buried as shown in Peter's post. I do think there's room for fantasy made from historical events, I think what's jarring here is the fact that Hollywood did what Hollywood is really famous for doing. Yeah, it's expected and usually made fun of, but we still get dumbfounded when they actually announce it. Quote
Marzan Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 Just saw this trailer and like others I'm a bit baffled about what this has to do with the 47 Ronin at all. Quote
peter Posted August 1, 2013 Posted August 1, 2013 I'm not an expert on historical based Japanese dramas and how the their handled in Japanese media, so this isn't a counter point. What you're saying is probably totally true. But using Shogun Assassin as an example... SA is a story based on a manga and 47 Ronin is a legend based on a true event in Japanese history (right?). People still visit the grave site where the bodies are suppose to be buried as shown in Peter's post. I do think there's room for fantasy made from historical events, I think what's jarring here is the fact that Hollywood did what Hollywood is really famous for doing. Yeah, it's expected and usually made fun of, but we still get dumbfounded when they actually announce it. Yes, it's the grave markers are definitely real, and I assure you that no dragons or surfer dudes were buried in that plot, haha! Quote
areaseven Posted October 22, 2013 Author Posted October 22, 2013 Mark my word: This movie will tank at the box office. It is guaranteed to receive Golden Raspberry Award nominations and maybe win some. Quote
peter Posted October 22, 2013 Posted October 22, 2013 (edited) If they called it Big Trouble in Little Japan, I wouldn't have been opposed...........except it doesn't look funny. I'm now 99% confident that the title of the film was a totally random coincidence in regards to the original 47 ronin story. There didn't seem to be any elements of the original story other than 47 "samurai". "Ronin" with Robert Deniro had more to do with the original story than this film. Original: When and where: 1703, Japan has been pretty much unified by the Tokugawa, not much going on as far as civil unrest is concerned (compared to Pre-tokugawa era) Who: Asano and his vassals (who become ronin) and Kira and his clan. Story: Lord Asaon assaults (reasons for the assualt are debatable depending on what part of Japan you're from) Lord Kira and is sentenced to seppuku. Asano's vassals become masterless (ronin) and plot to take revenge over a two year period of laying low. The ronin kill Kira and are sentenced to seppuku. Outcome: Family name restored, although only 1/10 of original territory is restored to the family. New: When and were: Who knows when, and probably Japan. Who: Half breed slave that was banished from land (assuming Japan?), 47 "samurai", some dude, some chick, a creature from Avatar, and a dragon. Story: The folks that owned this slave have taken over the land (assuming Japan?). Seems like there's civil unrest (mounts of corpes) or at the implied notion that these folks are overthrowing the existing government. The half-breed ex-slave with a green lightsaber + 47 "samurai" go against an "infinite" army backed up by a couple of mythical creatures and a dragon. Outcome: Yet to be determined. Correlation between the old and the new: the number 47 Edited October 22, 2013 by peter Quote
areaseven Posted October 30, 2013 Author Posted October 30, 2013 Yay - more trailer footage. More stuff that doesn't make sense. Quote
Gakken85 Posted December 24, 2013 Posted December 24, 2013 (edited) http://herald-review.com/blogs/decaturade/the-beautiful-disaster-of-ronin/article_1c51a756-6c1b-11e3-8fb6-001a4bcf887a.html Some of the higher-ups at Universal were apparently very impressed with these, because they saw fit to hand Rinsch a starting budget of $175 million to direct a period piece epic based on one of Japan’s most famous national legend Production costs expanded, ballooning up to an estimated $225 million. Numerous delays halted production, leading to reshoots. Even Reeves, the film’s supposed star, was busy during part of its production with his own directorial debut, “Man of Tai Chi.” He eventually was brought back for reshoots to, I kid you not, add him back in to the film’s final action sequence. Apparently he wasn’t a part of it previously? Does that seem concerning?Unsurprisingly, the critical reviews have been scathing as well. My favorite is this 0.5 review from Film.com, which calls the movie “possibly the second-worst thing to happen to Japan so far this century.” The movie opened the first week of December in Japan, earning only $1.3 million in its first weekend. It was beaten handily by a film titled “Lupin the 3rd vs. Detective Conan: The Movie,” Wow... this is going to be worse than I thought. I remember seeing the whole concept in an early trailer and I was totally uninterested. Edited December 24, 2013 by Gakken85 Quote
areaseven Posted December 25, 2013 Author Posted December 25, 2013 The numbers don't lie - this is the movie to not watch this Holiday season. Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 10% Metacritic Score: 27 out of 100 "Memo to Hollywood: Find another use for Keanu Reeves." - Joe Neumaier, New York Daily News "Insufferably boring, culturally hegemonic, and profoundly ugly." - David Ehrlich, Film.com Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted December 25, 2013 Posted December 25, 2013 I am going to watch this Friday, the critics can kiss it and have a Merry Christmas. Quote
Twoducks Posted December 25, 2013 Posted December 25, 2013 Now I feel like I want to see it. Should be worth a few laughs. Quote
Gakken85 Posted December 26, 2013 Posted December 26, 2013 I still need to see hobbit, so this is an easy miss for me haha Quote
ErikElvis Posted December 28, 2013 Posted December 28, 2013 Well not as bad as the reviews made it out to be but not really good either.... Quote
peter Posted December 28, 2013 Posted December 28, 2013 The first mistake was to use the title 47 ronin, They should have just come up with some other title, and it might not have met such harsh criticism. If you turn your brain off for just a second, and disconnect the notion that this film has anything to do with Chushingura/47 ronin, then you might find it about as entertaining as say LOTR, Star Wars, Avatar, Pirates of the Carribean or Godzilla. But because they felt the need to add some credibility to the story, they completely sunk this ship. Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted December 29, 2013 Posted December 29, 2013 I just got back from seeing it, best samurai movie I ever watched, ignore the silly critics, 'nough said. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.