DuelGundam2099 Posted August 26, 2013 Posted August 26, 2013 (edited) Hey, I saw the first two sequels in theaters and I'm not stupid! Besides, they so-so as far as US movie revenue, most of that money was from other countries. There is a reason Hollywood rarely aims for strictly the US and barely acknowledge domestic audiences. Edited August 26, 2013 by DuelGundam2099 Quote
Duke Togo Posted August 26, 2013 Posted August 26, 2013 Edgar Wright is doing Ant-Man. So yes, seriously. Quote
skullmilitia Posted August 26, 2013 Posted August 26, 2013 The only thing worse than reboots are changing of actors. Also Ben Affleck? A serious actor? Wha? He made two movies that Hollywood elites got Boners for and gave him some award. Those two movies Didn't actually set any records for sales. It's just typical overhyped Insider elitism that is normal Hollywood. The guy is a great cameo actor, but fails as a leading Role, he can't be taken seriously enough to be a crime fighting Veteran with scars deeper than most villains. He's never played a dark role, and Batman is truly a dark Character, to him justice, he will not. This isn't fan boy talking, it's someone looking at simple dynamics. If you're going to change a characters known actor, he has to be Better than the latter. Bale has proven himself in every role, serious, dark Intrigue, everything you name it. Affleck? Jay and Silent Bob? Armageddon? Rain deer games? No bro, Quote
electric indigo Posted August 26, 2013 Posted August 26, 2013 Among the "most anticipated" list at imdb are: Untitled Batman Reboot (????) - oh, for the love of Christ and his uncle Pete. When will Hollywood give this reboot bullsh*t a rest? Well, in the comics industry, characters are rebooted and artists changed in mid-series since day one, so this is what to expect when comics and movies merge into mainstream entertainment. Quote
chowyunskinny Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 Bryan Cranston is Lex Luthor http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/bryan-cranston-cast-as-lex-luthor-in-man-of-steel-20130826 Quote
reddsun1 Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 Bryan Cranston is Lex Luthor http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/bryan-cranston-cast-as-lex-luthor-in-man-of-steel-20130826 Could be another case of potential actor-overexposure. You know, kinda like the way Samuel L. Jackson ended up in movies with seemingly schlocked together scenes just so he could go "mother fu**er!" in booming tones. Gonna end up typecasting the poor guy. Quote
Einherjar Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 (edited) Ben Affleck as Batman doesn't sound that ridiculous to me. These don't either. He needs a to have a good playboy millionaire facade, a terrorizing raspy voice while wearing a costume, and be able to do a believable badass when beating up thugs and maybe Superman for the role. I think he's done a lot of that during his career already. Edited August 27, 2013 by Einherjar Quote
azrael Posted August 27, 2013 Posted August 27, 2013 Bryan Cranston is Lex Luthor Ummmm...They're citing a comic book blog as the source. Really reliable there Rolling Stone.... Quote
RD Blade Posted August 29, 2013 Posted August 29, 2013 I just hope Superman gets his briefs back. Quote
terry the lone wolf Posted August 29, 2013 Posted August 29, 2013 You can forget that. DC seems to be allergic to their heroes wearing their underwear on the outside.. Quote
Duke Togo Posted August 29, 2013 Posted August 29, 2013 You can forget that. DC seems to be allergic to their heroes wearing their underwear on the outside.. Probably has something to do with it looking silly. Quote
taksraven Posted August 29, 2013 Posted August 29, 2013 Probably has something to do with it looking silly. For once, I agree with you.... Quote
RD Blade Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 Probably has something to do with it looking silly. That's true, it does. But no more than the space yoga pants he's sporting in MoS. And I find it odd that Snyder would nix Superman's briefs when they were the standard uniform of every dude in 300. Quote
anime52k8 Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 Probably has something to do with it looking silly. and yet they think it's looks perfectly ok for super girl to be wearing red bikini bottoms over her leotard. Quote
Duke Togo Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 and yet they think it's looks perfectly ok for super girl to be wearing red bikini bottoms over her leotard. This is relevant how? Quote
areaseven Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 and yet they think it's looks perfectly ok for super girl to be wearing red bikini bottoms over her leotard. This is relevant how? Yeah, how is this relevant? And who came up with this design? Quote
skullmilitia Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 It's relevant because DC sucks. They destined for failure, whether its shitacular movies or giving Mattel toy licenses. The ONLY reason why the Nolan trilogy did well is because DC stayed away. Quote
Duke Togo Posted August 30, 2013 Posted August 30, 2013 It's relevant because DC sucks. They destined for failure, whether its shitacular movies or giving Mattel toy licenses. The ONLY reason why the Nolan trilogy did well is because DC stayed away. Well, yes. I'd argue that The Dark Knight is the only truly excellent film out if the bunch, but that's not really relevant to the discussion. Quote
Twoducks Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Fully agree with this video (and very interesting view starting in the 5 minute count): http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/7987-Batfleck Quote
jenius Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Wait, they casted HEATH LEDGER to be the joker! What maroons! Knight's Tale sissy gonna get all Australian on us... just what we needed. Quote
terry the lone wolf Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 It's relevant because DC sucks. They destined for failure, whether its shitacular movies or giving Mattel toy licenses. The ONLY reason why the Nolan trilogy did well is because DC stayed away. Doesn't Chris Nolan run the DC Movieverse? Besides the problem was never DC it was the Warner execs who absolutely had no idea (or even cared) who these character were and what they were about. Example: Geoff Johns had to explain to a WB exec that the Green Lantern they were making Gay was not THE Green Lantern but A Green Lantern (the original one)... Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Green Lantern they were making GayUhh, did I miss something or is this a typo? Quote
azrael Posted August 31, 2013 Posted August 31, 2013 Uhh, did I miss something or is this a typo? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Scott#The_New_52 Quote
Black Valkyrie Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Since the announcement of Affleck as the Bat, Forever and Batman & Robin Theme popped in my head and until now its playing in my head . Quote
areaseven Posted September 2, 2013 Posted September 2, 2013 Some days, you just can't get rid of a bomb. But there is hope. Sign the Petition Quote
Black Valkyrie Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Affleck voice sounds more like the late Lorenzo Music, who was the original VA for Garfield. Quote
areaseven Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Affleck voice sounds more like the late Lorenzo Music, who was the original VA for Garfield. Now that right there is an insult to Garfield. Show some respect. Quote
RD Blade Posted September 3, 2013 Posted September 3, 2013 Some days, you just can't get rid of a bomb. But there is hope. Sign the Petition Quote
Penguin Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Fan rage = mostly boring They rant, and rage, and fuss, and whine, and make pronouncements of doom and promote their "wisdom" on everything that Hollywood does wrong and how they would fix it. A few come up with some truly hilarious bits, most not so much, and few spectacularly stupid moments. The film will be made, it will be good or bad, and life will go on. I've been a Batman fan longer than some of these fans have been alive, and I'll still say if there are things in life that merit this kind of ire and negativity, Batman movie casting is not one of them. Love the Adam West peition... predictable, but fun nonetheless. That original Batman movie is still one of my favourites. And Affleck? He's a reasonably skilled actor who got overexposed and has made a decent comeback. He's as good a choice as any, IMHO. Quote
Gakken85 Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 "Comic" movie fans will watch anything these days. Any major leading man in Hollywood could play Batman, and they'll slap it on screen to make a buck. That doesn't mean it's a good idea or it will make a great movie. Quote
terry the lone wolf Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Dark Knight & Smallville artist Steve Scott draws Bat-Affleck! http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/09/04/either-this-is-real-ben-affleck-as-batman-concept-art-or-steve-scott-is-a-very-funny-guy/ Quote
areaseven Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Dark Knight & Smallville artist Steve Scott draws Bat-Affleck! http://www.bleedingcool.com/2013/09/04/either-this-is-real-ben-affleck-as-batman-concept-art-or-steve-scott-is-a-very-funny-guy/ I love how the captions stress out the rule of "No Bat Nipples". Quote
azrael Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 I love how the captions stress out the rule of "No Bat Nipples". Probably a fake. Quote
EXO Posted September 4, 2013 Posted September 4, 2013 Not a fake just not official movie material most likely. I don't really see the huge difference between this and the last costume. It's just a black suit with too many lines. I'd rather they'd go sleeker and minimize all the cuts. I think they should go CG with the neck if they can't figure out how to move his head around. And maybe break up the color and go with a dark gray body with the big black symbol on the chest. All black is starting to get boring. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.