TwinkiePlatter Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 I don't think it did. It only showed her torso in the cockpit early in the "Movie" and her head later on. Might need to watch it again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vespaeda Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 I've long since lost my Perfect Memory Ed., but from the plethora of scans, posts & diagrams(as well as the input of a certain past member), I have to go w/the motorcycle seat scenario. The glaring anomaly of how the Meltran would be able to physically straddle the gap between the suits legs & hip joints rules out the "legs-in upper-thigh" solution. The mechs "crotch" would have to be unbelievably narrow to allow the pilot to slide both legs into each armoured leg, let alone allow range of motion. My familiarity with A & P & some ergonomics really makes it hard for me to envision the powersuit walking, jumping and doing that reflex/tuck missile salvo while keeping the Meltran's hips connected to her legs. She'd be crushed raising her knees. In the "What's next from Yamato" permanent header thread(I think in Toys Forum), this discussion took place about the 1/60 Qeaud. I piped in that my experiences w/ onna no Nihon(Japanese ladies) was that they could remain in 'sai za' and frog-squat position for HOURS w/out apparent discomfort. This is analogous to a motorcycle tuck and also a simple solution to discrepancies in mecha dimensions vs. limits of human articulation & flexibility, and risks of battle damage to limbs extended outside the torso frame. I also remember someone posting one of the lineart diagrams in the same thread with a recessed view from the depths of the cockpit-out, that one could make out the curved cushioning area for the shins for a straddling pilot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uxi Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 (edited) Heh, what is the difference in DYRL and SDF versions of the Q-rau gonna be explained by the continuity people? They claim the VF-1 differences are that between block numbers or the VF-1X model represented in the "movie in a movie" (ignoring the whole retcon that is...)... But maybe the "other [Zentran/Meltran] fleets" have done upgrades, too? Woo hoo. Info on the Yammie Q-rau... Wonder if this "pilot" is gonna be posable or not. What do you *think*, Graham? Don't have to reveal the skinny, but how would you *think* it would go? Though if you have skinny and are free to reveal it, then please by all means do so. Edited December 16, 2003 by Uxi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwalker Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 I have had a chance to closely examine Yamato's Q-Rau, although only the mecha, not the pilot figure, which wasn't ready at the time.Based on the Yamato toy, there is no way that the pilots legs could fit into the mecha's thighs. However, it does appear as if they fit into the back section of the mecha. Graham Graham, thanks for answer. Yamato has based some of their toys designs in preexistent Macross resin model kits, so I wouldnt be surprised they followed the Yellow Sub QR model design for positioning the pilot. Vespaeda: I'm glad to see this is an ongoing debate!! Here we have the saddle-like seat again!! Though the idea of the pilot seated in sai za position is really interesting I can´t see how that could fit with the Gold Book artline. I know we can´t see the kness of the pilot in that pic but: if she were on her kness the artist should have drawn her ankles and the lower part of the legs, didn't he? BTW: the QRs are seated for storage?? I thought that those were toilets!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwalker Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 (edited) From the Yellow Sub instructions: EDIT: sorry, just discoverd you can't post images while quoting...just link them.. Edited December 16, 2003 by Gerwalker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerwalker Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 Here is the pic from the Yellow sub instructions (that Meltran needs help!!): Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Göönk Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 For the legs I think it would be very unconfortable to put legs inside the backpack. Try to be in that position for more than 30 seconds, you'll get the idea. The back is completely folded. It's not a natural position. Also for the neck, pilot would have to bend her neck completely to have her head vertical. What do you think? I think that comfort isn't a priority in an anime's power armor / weapon in general Yes, after seeing your avatar, I know why you like female pilot to suffer from non confortable flight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GobotFool Posted December 16, 2003 Share Posted December 16, 2003 I have had a chance to closely examine Yamato's Q-Rau, although only the mecha, not the pilot figure, which wasn't ready at the time.Based on the Yamato toy, there is no way that the pilots legs could fit into the mecha's thighs. However, it does appear as if they fit into the back section of the mecha. Graham While they I know you didn't get to see the figure itself, were you able to ask if it was going to be articulated? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodavan Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 (edited) Having spend a lot of time modeling a cg q-rua my 2 pennies is .... The legs can only go in the backpack .... Leg mechanism , missle + bay door that slide into the leg for opening ? Edited May 10, 2005 by Rodavan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingNor Posted May 10, 2005 Share Posted May 10, 2005 I think the intention in the original drawings and concept was indeed to have the pilots legs extend into the mech legs. from the design and look of it, it seems obvious ( i like the explination that the high knees on the Rau are so that the joints will match with the pilot) but those were happier simpler times of morphing 2d animation where anything will fit anywhere. now with the action figure out, and showing that the "legs in legs" design doesn't work with the proportions given, i think the cannon is shifting to having the legs in the backpack. remember that if something doesn't work. it will be changed. macross cannon isn't as set in stone as some might think. personally i like the "legs in legs" design. i think it's slick. but i bet its not feezable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodavan Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) Talking about how a pilot would fit , I can across these . Has anybody seen these before Edited May 11, 2005 by Rodavan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 wow, that's interesting, a variable glaug and a regult I don't think the zentrans are those size, otherwise it would be impossible to fit on the regult 'head' For the pilot position in a queadluun rau's, I think a screenshot from DYRL could help a bit, when a meltran pilot got shot and she crawls out of the suit just before she dies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the white drew carey Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) I think the intention in the original drawings and concept was indeed to have the pilots legs extend into the mech legs.from the design and look of it, it seems obvious ( i like the explination that the high knees on the Rau are so that the joints will match with the pilot) but those were happier simpler times of morphing 2d animation where anything will fit anywhere. now with the action figure out, and showing that the "legs in legs" design doesn't work with the proportions given, i think the cannon is shifting to having the legs in the backpack. remember that if something doesn't work. it will be changed. macross cannon isn't as set in stone as some might think. personally i like the "legs in legs" design. i think it's slick. but i bet its not feezable. I still think the legs are meant to go into the legs. The only reason the legs go into the backpack is because making a small scale, poseable toy/ sturdy, accurate model which includes a non-poseable pilot figure is to keep the pilots legs out of the way- Hence, into the backpack. When the 1/55's were made, did the design concept of the VF-1 suddenly change to accomodate the toy's clumsily large swing bars? No. The legs in backpack adaption of the toys and models are simply that, an adaptation, and, IMHO, in no way effect the canoninity (is that a word?) of the original design. Edited May 11, 2005 by the white drew carey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skull 0ne Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) Off topic post...... Edited May 11, 2005 by Skull 0ne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skull 0ne Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) once again....... Edited May 11, 2005 by Skull 0ne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skull 0ne Posted May 11, 2005 Share Posted May 11, 2005 (edited) Nothing to see here anymore........ Edited May 11, 2005 by Skull 0ne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingNor Posted May 12, 2005 Share Posted May 12, 2005 Nothing to see here anymore........ lame, now i know you said something that totally embarrissed you. i wonder what it was!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichterX Posted May 12, 2005 Share Posted May 12, 2005 Nothing to see here anymore........ Damn man... three times? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godzilla Posted May 13, 2005 Share Posted May 13, 2005 Nothing to see here anymore........ Damn man... three times? I wonder... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zentrandude Posted May 13, 2005 Share Posted May 13, 2005 proly in reference of the gay mecha porn of rodavan's image. Anyways I belive the pilots legs proly does goes in the backpack or maybe the ladies got exctreme flexibilty and bend their legs in wild positions which might explain why max left the macross in the meltran ship in dyrl. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skull 0ne Posted May 13, 2005 Share Posted May 13, 2005 (edited) All I did was post some cockpit and pilot positions pics of the glaug and regult, becouse Morpheus had siad somthing about them not fitting in there, but I releazied after I posted that my pics were to big, off topic and I could not get them to resize so I gave up a edited my posts. Thats all. MECH PORN O and here is somthing for the topic at hand: Edited May 13, 2005 by Skull 0ne Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathan Posted May 26, 2005 Share Posted May 26, 2005 Watching Episode 12 Millia climbs on, jumps in, and goes straight down. She does not move like she's putting her legs into a over sized pair of boots - her legs in the mecha's legs- so her legs either go into the backpack or she's sitting on something. Maybe when the next Design Works book comes out we'll know more. That is assuming ofcourse that it does come out.mumble mumble mumble cus cus cus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morpheus Posted May 27, 2005 Share Posted May 27, 2005 All I did was post some cockpit and pilot positions pics of the glaug and regult, becouse Morpheus had siad somthing about them not fitting in there, but I releazied after I posted that my pics were to big, off topic and I could not get them to resize so I gave up a edited my posts. Thats all. MECH PORN Skull One, sorry for troubling you with all the post about the glaug and regult cockpit . Back to topic, from the pic above I'm sure that the leg went to the leg section of the Rau's. (confusing isn't it). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VF-18S Hornet Posted May 28, 2005 Share Posted May 28, 2005 And here's one of it open... ahem...bit off-topic but....MAN that´s MILIA NAKED !!! Ohhh man!!! Please don't be a dream, Please don't be a dream. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.