Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 12/23/2015 at 11:36 PM, Duke Togo said:

Yeah, we'll have to agree to strongly disagree on your spoiler tagged bit. Driver has been universally lauded for his performance, and it's a brilliant start for the character. Easily the best and most dynamic villain we've seen on film this year.

What is the world coming too? His acting or the direction is horribly weak.

As for the lightsaber fights, if Kylo is also supposed to be untrained then it gets a pass, otherwise it reminds me too much of the fight between Luke and Vader in Return of the Jedi - WAY too many spots where they left themselves open to a strike from the opponent. Fine for our heros who were untrained but really bad for a trained sword fighter.

Posted
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 3:40 AM, Kelsain said:

Hopefully no spoilers to anyone, but I think this movie contains one of the best lightsaber duels in the entire canon.

What got me was the superb attention to detail. Everything the sabers touched either went up in steam, sparked or caught a little fire, from nearby tree branches to piles of snow that were just whicked with the tip as the saber spun.

I'm still trying to figure out

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

My Top 3 Lightsabre fights with emotional impact:

1) RoTJ. Luke and Vader finally get to go at it as equals.

2) TPM. Darth Maul owning QuiGon and Obi Wan until that lame strike at the end.

3) TFA.

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

Outside of the Maul fight in TPM, the prequel fights were overly choreographed and rather ridiculous. Basically two people twirling swords with no sense of threat or danger. The Awakens duel is fierce.

Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 5:05 AM, Duke Togo said:

Outside of the Maul fight in TPM, the prequel fights were overly choreographed and rather ridiculous. Basically two people twirling swords with no sense of threat or danger. The Awakens duel is fierce.

Exactly. They (PT)felt more like a Wushu exhibition then a fight.

The Dooku vs Yoda. At the speed Yoda was moving in that fight Dooku should've been Swiss cheese after the first 30secs.

ObiWan vs Anakin: Eh. Ewans McGregors acting was great but Hayden sucked all the life out of that fight

Rey vs Kylo felt more raw. Like there was serious intent to kill with each stroke. It felt dangerous.

Posted (edited)

I would expect fully trained Jedi's to fight as they did in the prequels. Why wouldn't they? The prequels took place during a time when the Republic and the strength of the Jedi order was still at its peak; the fighting styles reflect that era. On the same hand, the styling of combat returned to a more primitive version as it did in FA, since all characters involved are still in light saber dueling 101. Makes total sense to me...

Edited by myk
Posted (edited)

I had this discussion with my brother after a second viewing, about the final fight..

  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Chronocidal
Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 4:40 AM, Dynaman said:

As for the lightsaber fights, if Kylo is also supposed to be untrained then it gets a pass, otherwise it reminds me too much of the fight between Luke and Vader in Return of the Jedi - WAY too many spots where they left themselves open to a strike from the opponent. Fine for our heros who were untrained but really bad for a trained sword fighter.

In fairness to Jedi... what WE perceive to be an opening may not be the actual case, given it's a fight between jedi. They have telepathy, telekinesis, and some degree of precognition. To the extent that one jedi with a sword is an effective force against multiple trained soldiers with guns. I would actually EXPECT those abilities to drastically alter a swordfight's appearance, though in the original movies it's only wildly obvious when Luke is leaping twenty feet through the air doing somersaults.

In that context, I find the fight between ObiWan and Darth Vader on the Death Star interesting in how conventional it looks. Through the lens of the franchise, it has a very cautious feel to it, as though neither side is certain of the other's capabilities, but know better than to take their foe lightly. Darth's smack-talk aside, it looks like a fight neither party is sure they can win.

Of course, out of continuity, what happened is Lucas felt lightsabers should have a mass effect to make them feel more like real swords, and then in Jedi he was like "nah, lightsabers are weightless now, let's go wild with the acrobatics", a weightless blade looks a lot different in action than a weighted one, and I'm reading way too much into this. But that line of thought is a lot less fun!

Posted (edited)
  On 12/24/2015 at 6:03 AM, myk said:

I would expect fully trained Jedi's to fight as they did in the prequels. Why wouldn't they?

Because they'd be dead if they fought like that. It's all flourishes and twirls and needless maneuvers. It's style over substance. The duel in Sith is the most anticlimactic confrontation in the Star Wars saga. It's horribly silly, and not once does it look like they're actually fighting against each other. There's no danger.

Edited by Duke Togo
Posted

The first prequel light saber fight with Maul was good because it was our first exposure to flashy duels. Most of the flash came from Maul. He was this awesome master fighter that could hold off a 2 others. You thought such flash was just Maul's trademark. It wasn't. Every fight in the prequel was flashy.

Posted (edited)

^^I'm calling bullsh*t on your stance, Duke. If you want to argue about the parts of the fight after they go into the lava, then you might have an argument.

But the first half of the climactic fight, both of them are going all out.

The other thing to keep in mind is that Anakin's saber fighting style has always been to go all out, be all offense. While, Obi-Wan's style puts a premium on defense, only attacking when an opening is most advantageous.

At least, the two remembered to use their Force powers during the big fight.

  Reveal hidden contents
Edited by Mog
Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 1:34 PM, Duke Togo said:

Because they'd be dead if they fought like that. It's all flourishes and twirls and needless maneuvers. It's style over substance. The duel in Sith is the most anticlimactic confrontation in the Star Wars saga. It's horribly silly, and not once does it look like they're actually fighting against each other. There's no danger.

While it is a bit over-the-top, and I personally feel the duels (especially the one in RotS) should have been toned down a notch, the notion of lightsaber duels between skilled Force-sensitive fighters as a nauseating game of strategy, response, and timing as each fighter tries to use their own powers of precognition to outmaneuver their opponent's, makes sense to some degree. I certainly prefer the duel in TFA- it felt more raw and swordy-killy- but I don't think it's fair to look at a fight between two telekinetic, telepathic seers trained in wizardry, wielding laser swords from the perspective of normal swordplay. You can take that to a further degree if you want to get caught up in it. Actual sword fights aren't like fencing at all, and are decided within the first couple of seconds, when whoever gets the first move puts his sword through his opponent. That's not very cinematic though.

The feeling I got from the lightsaber duel in TFA was

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

I have to disagree on the TFA duel.

  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 3:00 PM, Duke Togo said:

I have to disagree on the TFA duel.

  Reveal hidden contents
  Reveal hidden contents

Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 3:40 PM, Dio said:
  Reveal hidden contents
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 3:46 PM, Duke Togo said:
  Reveal hidden contents
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

No,

  Reveal hidden contents

Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 3:46 PM, Duke Togo said:
  Reveal hidden contents
  Reveal hidden contents

Gotta admit to agreeing with Duke on many of the prequal fights, they were over the top and not in a good way either. I also despise most things I believe are being called "Wushu" that may have something to do with my opinion. The TRUE (and ONLY true) mark of a master martial artist (in any form of martial art) is one who is able to conserve energy while forcing the opponent to use theirs. Fancy Martial arts in the movies do the reverse.

Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 6:42 PM, Dynaman said:
  Reveal hidden contents
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted

I mostly agree with Keith (for once), although I think I liked the movie more than he did.

But yeah, since Lucas said they discarded his version, I really want to see what his version was.

Posted

Speaking on the prequel fights, totally there for the audience entertainment. As someone who has been in several high level hand-to-hand fights, as well as several with weapons (once bladed...) I can say that most of it is positioning. You don't make unnecessary moves or take unnecessary chances while getting into the other persons head and anticipating moves. Having magical, space-wizardry precognition would only make the fights less interesting to witness.

Posted

The actor that played Maul studied wushu....that's why the fight in PM looked flashier. Original trilogy saber battles, actors had kenjutsu style sword instruction

Posted (edited)
  On 12/24/2015 at 1:34 PM, Duke Togo said:

Because they'd be dead if they fought like that. It's all flourishes and twirls and needless maneuvers. It's style over substance. The duel in Sith is the most anticlimactic confrontation in the Star Wars saga. It's horribly silly, and not once does it look like they're actually fighting against each other. There's no danger.

I agree with you, especially when you look at Episode 3's lava duel; all the twirling and showboating was ridiculous. Do you guys remember the one part of the duel where Anakin and Obi spin their light sabers in front of each other for like 10 seconds but don't make any effort to hit each other? It was the dumbest thing I had ever seen, BUT...I see it was necessary to differentiate their style of fighting to what we saw in the OT, because the dueling in those movies looked.....too simple? Lucas sought to stand apart from the OT and, for better or for worse, they did just that with the ludicrous light saber battles, and all of the CGI and all that other BS. However, I still like to think that the different styles showcase different time periods in the history of the Republic and the Jedi Order. Are the fights in the prequels absurd? Yes, but I appreciated the effort to dazzle the viewer with the possibility of what a trained, seasoned Force user could be like in light saber/melee/physical combat...

Edited by myk
Posted

The one duel in the prequels that is better for me is one of the shortest but also perhaps the most interesting. The Anakin vs Dooku in Ep 2 right before Yoda shows up. If you watch it, it's like Anakin is mimicking Dooku before Dooku does his move. It's pretty cool, especially after it goes into complete darkness. I read somewhere it was shot to be longer, but was edited down. I also like the ObiWan vs Maul after Liam Neeson gets it. Those two guys were definitely goin at it fast, lots of rehearsals, and it showed.

Posted
  On 12/24/2015 at 5:27 PM, Duke Togo said:

No,

  Reveal hidden contents
Fair enough, and I think we're really in agreement over the generalities,
  Reveal hidden contents
Posted
  Reveal hidden contents

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...