areaseven Posted October 8, 2012 Posted October 8, 2012 (edited) Disney and the crew behind the Pirates of the Caribbean series bring The Lone Ranger back to the big screen, produced by Jerry Bruckheimer and directed by Gore Verbinski. Armie Hammer (the Winklevoss twins in The Social Network) puts on the mask as the title character, while Johnny Depp plays his trusty partner Tonto. How much Disney paid Depp for this is anyone's guess.Also starring in the film are William Fichtner (Ken Rosenberg in the Grand Theft Auto series, bank manager in The Dark Knight), Ruth Wilson (Jane Eyre, Princess Betsy in Anna Karenina), James Badge Dale (Chase in 24, Eric Savin in Iron Man 3), Tom Wilkinson (Falcone in Batman Begins, IMF Leader in Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol), Barry Pepper (Jonnie Tyler in Battlefield Earth, Pvt. Jackson in Saving Private Ryan), Helena Bonham Carter (Marla in Fight Club, Bellatrix Lestrange in the Harry Potter series), and James Frain (Jarvis in Tron: Legacy).The Lone Ranger premieres on July 3, 2013. Official Site Edited July 2, 2013 by areaseven Quote
mechaninac Posted October 8, 2012 Posted October 8, 2012 I'll just pretend this doesn't exist until it hits broadcast TV, and then, out of pure morbid curiosity, I may give it a viewing. Quote
Keith Posted October 8, 2012 Posted October 8, 2012 Wild Wild West 2? Never thought they'd make that sequel! Quote
areaseven Posted October 8, 2012 Author Posted October 8, 2012 Wild Wild West 2? Never thought they'd make that sequel! What are you talking about? That was already done with Jonah Hex. Quote
Keith Posted October 8, 2012 Posted October 8, 2012 What are you talking about? That was already done with Jonah Hex. No, Jonah Hex was the Asylum version of Wild Wild West. Quote
Old_Nash Posted October 8, 2012 Posted October 8, 2012 Ok, enough.. Where's I put my Reaction Weapons? Quote
areaseven Posted December 11, 2012 Author Posted December 11, 2012 Okay, now that's being way over the top. Hopefully, it'll be better than the last Lone Ranger movie. Quote
Duke Togo Posted December 11, 2012 Posted December 11, 2012 The first trailer was vague enough to peak interest without causing much concern. The second trailer on the other hand... yeah, I won't be seeing this movie. Quote
Knight26 Posted December 11, 2012 Posted December 11, 2012 I have to agree with the Duke here, this looks like an unmitigated piece of crap, that doesn't insult the source material, but digs it up out of its grave, rapes it, then craps all over it before pissing on. Not only that it is a serious insult to all native american actors out there who are struggling to find work, just so they can put their golden boy johny depp in the costarring role. Quote
Raptor One Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 So what you're saying is, you didn't like the trailer? Quote
Fly4victory Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 (edited) As a fan of the Lone Ranger, if they did a good job: drink a Coors but as of now looks like they should try eating the silver bullet. Edited December 12, 2012 by Fly4victory Quote
Froy Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 Now the Lone Ranger turns to be inmmortal or he always was? Quote
mechaninac Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 That trailer has just cemented my original impression... Quote
EXO Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 Now the Lone Ranger turns to be inmmortal or he always was? Not really immortal but kinda like The Crow, he was reborn to superhero status but he can still be hurt or killed. His great grandnephew also becomes a superhero in the 60's, grandson of his brother that was a fellow Ranger. Quote
areaseven Posted July 2, 2013 Author Posted July 2, 2013 The Lone Ranger isn't out yet, but it's already in the running for worst movie of the year. Eat your hearts out, Wild Wild West and Jonah Hex. Rotten Tomatoes Rating: 16% Metacritic Score: 40 "Who was that masked man? Who cares?" - Ty Burr, Boston Globe "Groan Ranger. Well, so much for 'best western.' This one's the worst - and then some." - Lou Lumerick, New York Post "This attempt for another Pirates of the Caribbean-scaled series tries to have it too many ways tonally, resulting in a work that wobbles and thrashes all over the place." - Todd McCarthy, Hollywood Reporter Quote
Duke Togo Posted July 2, 2013 Posted July 2, 2013 A7, I think this calls for a "DUH!" It's like those two White House movies that came out: if you saw the trailers for any of these movies and said, "wow, that looks great, I can't wait to see it," you deserve to have your money taken from you. Quote
reddsun1 Posted July 4, 2013 Posted July 4, 2013 Initial impression: So, Johnny Depp just re-does his Jack Sparrow schtick, only in war-paint and feathers? The guy playing the Ranger is not really named Armie. His birth name is Armand. Yes. That's right. When this poor bast*rd was growing up, whenever he had to write his name out for a test, or got called for attendance in class or what have you... Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted July 5, 2013 Posted July 5, 2013 I just got back from seeing it, awesome movie! Screw critics, this was fun for a 4th of July movie. Quote
Duke Togo Posted July 5, 2013 Posted July 5, 2013 I just got back from seeing it, awesome movie! Screw critics, this was fun for a 4th of July movie. No Quote
areaseven Posted July 5, 2013 Author Posted July 5, 2013 I just got back from seeing it, awesome movie! Screw critics, this was fun for a 4th of July movie. Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted July 5, 2013 Posted July 5, 2013 If you guys disagree it would be beneficial to know why. Quote
areaseven Posted July 5, 2013 Author Posted July 5, 2013 If you guys disagree it would be beneficial to know why. First, explain to us why it's awesome. Quote
DuelGundam2099 Posted July 5, 2013 Posted July 5, 2013 Video quality, lighting, pacing, action, sound, character development, and execution were all very well rounded all while sticking to the genre; pretty much how I judge every movie ever. Quote
Noriko Takaya Posted July 5, 2013 Posted July 5, 2013 Seems like you're going to have to bring back your "I Really, Really Hate This..." review series, A7. Quote
areaseven Posted July 5, 2013 Author Posted July 5, 2013 (edited) Seems like you're going to have to bring back your "I Really, Really Hate This..." review series, A7. Nah, that was for anime. And since Roger Ebert passed away, that portion of my reviews has been shelved for good. BTW, I just found out that the movie is 149 minutes long. Sure, that running time works for The Dark Knight, but this? Edited July 5, 2013 by areaseven Quote
Duke Togo Posted July 5, 2013 Posted July 5, 2013 Video quality, lighting, pacing, action, sound, character development, and execution were all very well rounded all while sticking to the genre; pretty much how I judge every movie ever. What genre would that be? Red face? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.