Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 2:43 AM, Duke Togo said:

Well, not so much that... It's just the obvious call to make. A. He'd definitely help, and B. He'd be a big help. His computer skills alone...

Well, does Cap really know Stark would help? I mean, we the audience know, sure, but they just had the one movie together (well, two for the Widow). It's possible that Cap, after being told not to trust anyone, doesn't trust Stark enough to ask for his help... Especially when Stark's repulsor tech is being used on the Insight helicarriers.

Posted

Re: Stark and where is was during The Winter Soldier, I'm almost/fairly/moderately sure that I saw

  Reveal hidden contents

Although that doesn't address if he had any armor or not.

-b.

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 2:02 PM, mikeszekely said:

Well, does Cap really know Stark would help? I mean, we the audience know, sure, but they just had the one movie together (well, two for the Widow). It's possible that Cap, after being told not to trust anyone, doesn't trust Stark enough to ask for his help... Especially when Stark's repulsor tech is being used on the Insight helicarriers.

Yet he trusts Black Widow and the dude he passed while out for a run? Or even Fury, for that matter?

Hell, Stark is the only guy you can trust, because he's the one guy you know who isn't anyone's tool and who doesn't bow to authority.

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 2:33 PM, Duke Togo said:

Yet he trusts Black Widow and the dude he passed while out for a run? Or even Fury, for that matter?Hell, Stark is the only guy you can trust, because he's the one guy you know who isn't anyone's tool and who doesn't bow to authority.

Stark had open heart surgery at the end of the IM3 so would he be in any shape, to help and he still has to rebuild his machine shop suit assuming he did not have a comparable setup in New York Avenger tower.

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 2:33 PM, Duke Togo said:

Yet he trusts Black Widow and the dude he passed while out for a run? Or even Fury, for that matter?

Hell, Stark is the only guy you can trust, because he's the one guy you know who isn't anyone's tool and who doesn't bow to authority.

Ah, but he didn't trust Black Widow. At least not at first. And I don't think he really trusted Fury, either, until he figured out that Hyrda was involved.

As for Falcon, well... I think the point of showing him running with and talking with Cap at the beginning, as well as at the VA support group meeting, was to present a sort of Reader's Digest version of them bonding. Yeah, it's pretty flimsy and contrived, but they're best buddies in the comics. I think it might have worked better if, instead of showing them meeting for the first time, they'd have used the running scene to establish that they have been friends.

And again, with Stark, yeah, we the audience get that he isn't anyone's tool and doesn't bow to authority. But from Cap's more limited POV, he might just be an arrogant hot head, which wouldn't necessarily inspire trust. Especially once he realized that Hydra is behind Insight, and Insight is using Stark's tech. How is Cap supposed to know, from that one time they hung out, if Insight is using Stark's tech because he thought he was working with Shield and was duped, or if Stark was in on it?

Honestly, of all three post-Avengers movies, Cap 2 is the one I have the least trouble accepting that the other Avengers wouldn't get involved. I mean, in Iron Man 3, terrorists freaking kidnapped the President! If that's not something you get Captain America on, I don't know what is...

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 7:47 PM, mikeszekely said:

Ah, but he didn't trust Black Widow. At least not at first. And I don't think he really trusted Fury, either, until he figured out that Hyrda was involved.

As for Falcon, well... I think the point of showing him running with and talking with Cap at the beginning, as well as at the VA support group meeting, was to present a sort of Reader's Digest version of them bonding. Yeah, it's pretty flimsy and contrived, but they're best buddies in the comics. I think it might have worked better if, instead of showing them meeting for the first time, they'd have used the running scene to establish that they have been friends.

And again, with Stark, yeah, we the audience get that he isn't anyone's tool and doesn't bow to authority. But from Cap's more limited POV, he might just be an arrogant hot head, which wouldn't necessarily inspire trust. Especially once he realized that Hydra is behind Insight, and Insight is using Stark's tech. How is Cap supposed to know, from that one time they hung out, if Insight is using Stark's tech because he thought he was working with Shield and was duped, or if Stark was in on it?

Honestly, of all three post-Avengers movies, Cap 2 is the one I have the least trouble accepting that the other Avengers wouldn't get involved. I mean, in Iron Man 3, terrorists freaking kidnapped the President! If that's not something you get Captain America on, I don't know what is...

But in IM3 they kidnapped him in the Airplane. The only other Avenger who can fly is Thor, and he doesn't have free reign to just jump back to Earth whenever he feels like it (nor does he have to care about the US president.) Stark was the only Avenger with the means to reach him. Not to mention that other than Banner the other three members of the Avengers are all SHIELD operatives and could have been on missions where they couldn't have been called up/back easily. Not that I'm defending IM3, I really didn't like it, but that's an explanation.

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 10:38 PM, miles316 said:

Is any one turned off by having

  Reveal hidden contents

Yes, and the subsequent fallout out from it. That's why after watching this film I'm not sure I really like it or not.

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 10:38 PM, miles316 said:

Is any one turned off by having

  Reveal hidden contents

Why does it turn you off?

Posted

I don't mind it at all. It's the other smaller deconstruction of the marvel universe that kinda worries me. Tony gets rid or the arch reactor from his chest, Fury with no eyepatch, Loki... what else?

Posted

Oh, come on now, you know that eye patch will come back once Fury has things going again. The stage is totally set for Captain America 3: The Secret War.

Posted

What you can't have Secret Wars without Spider-Man!

Totally basing that on the commercials as a little kid... never read the books...

Posted (edited)
  On 4/8/2014 at 11:51 PM, Mommar said:

Why does it turn you off?

No It does not I read a Review on SYFY BLaster sight complaining that it made it BLack and white not gray.

Edited by miles316
Posted
  On 4/9/2014 at 12:20 AM, EXO said:

What you can't have Secret Wars without Spider-Man!

Totally basing that on the commercials as a little kid... never read the books...

No no, not Secret Wars; Secret War. Completely different storyline that ran its course abouty a decade ago I think. Essentially, Fury goes underground to bring the fight to the bad guys.

Posted
  On 3/28/2014 at 7:51 PM, RedWolf said:

Oh my they spoiled Agents of SHIELD!

  Reveal hidden contents

Who's Bob?

Posted

Guys, Iron-man is not in the movie solving everything because

  Reveal hidden contents

So everything makes sense.


  On 4/4/2014 at 12:38 AM, Mommar said:

How familiar are you with the comics?

The Winter Soldier comic is the one story I have not read. Hear it is pretty good but I for once wanted to see a comic movie before the story they take elements from (plus, until these movies I was not a Cap fan lol). I'll check it out soon.

Posted
  On 4/6/2014 at 8:53 PM, karmajay said:

Well said and exactly my feelings! Right now I feel the producers of Superman Vs. Batman are just looking around thinking "WTF just happened?"

Yes, there's been a lot of talk about how the writers Joe and Anthony Russo did for the Captain America character what DC's film team SHOULD have been doing for Superman. I think DC have a lot to fear from the next Captain America film if the Marvel folks continue on a path like this. Then again, Man of Steel did big dollars, so repetitive super-fights sell just as much as good writing (mores the pity) so I guess it only matters to the people that care about that kind of thing :)

Guest davidwhangchoi
Posted
  On 4/9/2014 at 12:02 AM, EXO said:

I don't mind it at all. It's the other smaller deconstruction of the marvel universe that kinda worries me. Tony gets rid or the arch reactor from his chest, Fury with no eyepatch, Loki... what else?

Fury has no white hair on his sides.

Posted
  On 4/9/2014 at 2:20 PM, Mr March said:

Yes, there's been a lot of talk about how the writers Joe and Anthony Russo did for the Captain America character what DC's film team SHOULD have been doing for Superman. I think DC have a lot to fear from the next Captain America film if the Marvel folks continue on a path like this. Then again, Man of Steel did big dollars, so repetitive super-fights sell just as much as good writing (mores the pity) so I guess it only matters to the people that care about that kind of thing :)

Agreed. Captain America is Marvel's answer to Superman -- not in the superficial characteristics like origin, power set, etc., but more in terms of the ideological, "moral compass" sense. "Truth, justice, and the American way" is Superman's line, but it could just as easily have been Cap's. For years the argument has been that Superman is too much of a boy scout and doesn't appeal to today's more jaded audience, but I think the Marvel movies show that this just isn't the case. Captain America is every bit the boy scout that Superman is. And if you want to make a darker, sophisticated, more modern tale, you don't need to make him darker to appeal to the more cynical fans. Darker supporting characters and circumstances yes, but you leave his character alone to show why he's the moral compass. Marvel is basically doing a better Superman than DC!

  On 4/8/2014 at 7:47 PM, mikeszekely said:

Ah, but he didn't trust Black Widow. At least not at first. And I don't think he really trusted Fury, either, until he figured out that Hyrda was involved.

As for Falcon, well... I think the point of showing him running with and talking with Cap at the beginning, as well as at the VA support group meeting, was to present a sort of Reader's Digest version of them bonding. Yeah, it's pretty flimsy and contrived, but they're best buddies in the comics. I think it might have worked better if, instead of showing them meeting for the first time, they'd have used the running scene to establish that they have been friends.

And again, with Stark, yeah, we the audience get that he isn't anyone's tool and doesn't bow to authority. But from Cap's more limited POV, he might just be an arrogant hot head, which wouldn't necessarily inspire trust. Especially once he realized that Hydra is behind Insight, and Insight is using Stark's tech. How is Cap supposed to know, from that one time they hung out, if Insight is using Stark's tech because he thought he was working with Shield and was duped, or if Stark was in on it?

Honestly, of all three post-Avengers movies, Cap 2 is the one I have the least trouble accepting that the other Avengers wouldn't get involved. I mean, in Iron Man 3, terrorists freaking kidnapped the President! If that's not something you get Captain America on, I don't know what is...

I thought the reason why it made sense for Cap to trust him was because he was an outsider. Since it's been established that SHIELD has been corrupted, he can't go to anyone within the organization for help, so it makes sense for him to go with an outsider. Not that it would have been beyond the realm of possibilities for Falcon to be a mole (like Agent 13), but I think his outsider status plus the fact that he was just another solider on the battlefield (and not a covert ops agent like Widow who lies for a living) lent a greater sense of authenticity to him.

Posted
  On 4/9/2014 at 4:52 PM, davidwhangchoi said:

Fury has no white hair on his sides.

That was never there in the first place... :lol:

Cap brought the Falcon in, not the other way around. Plus, he didn't ask the Falcon to join the fight, he just needed a place to hide out, somewhere SHIELD doesn't have a connection too. But then again SHIELD can pretty much find you anywhere you go, especially with that DNA tracking technology.

Posted (edited)

Saw it about an hour ago..not bad, but not quite the "political thriller" some reviewers claim. Things I liked about the film: 1) Black Widow-Naturally :wub: 2) Her C7 Corvette Stingray- should have been featured more! 3) Nick Fury- had me guessing for a while!

4) The Falcon- pretty cool suit but he should have sleeves. 5) Robert Redford- Wish his character had turned out different :( .

6) S.H.I.E.L.D.- the building, Heli-carriers, jets, all looked cool B)) . Now things I didn't like: 1)Captain America- Through out the film I wanted to say: "F- YOU Cap, if you don't like it then just leave!" :angry: 2) The Winter Soldier- really just felt like they just "threw" him in there! <_< 3) Hydra- yeah, whatever! :rolleyes: 4) The final combat scene- where everything goes by so fast you can't keep track of the action! :blink: All in all, way better that the 1st but not the best Marvel Film.

Edited by aerocombatpilot
Posted
  On 4/16/2014 at 6:02 AM, anime52k8 said:

I feel like they're trying to lead up to civil war.

Given the number of movies a certain cast member has been contracted for I'd just assume something of that nature was going to happen.

Posted
  On 4/8/2014 at 10:38 PM, miles316 said:

Is any one turned off by having

  Reveal hidden contents

I thought that it was actually a very clever allegory on what's happening in real life.

Posted
  On 4/16/2014 at 11:42 PM, captain america said:

I thought that it was actually a very clever allegory on what's happening in real life.

Syfy Blaster have articles talking about winter Soldier saying it was disingenuous having

  Reveal hidden contents

be the big bad.

I was just curious how everyone here thought about it.

Posted

Nope, no issues with the "big bad" in The Winter Soldier here.

Marvel has done a really good job with incorporating traditional villains and villainous organizations (with The Mandarin from IM3 as an arguable exception). And I think how they've handled this particular org has been outstanding.

-b.

Posted (edited)

Is the Falcon the most impractical hero eva or is it just me?

1. Has to hold his hands straight out to fly.

2. Has no protective abilities, armor, or superhuman strength.

3. Uses pew pew machine guns.

4. Hovers stationary in the air to shoot said machine guns.

I guess he makes a good epic mount for cap when he needs to get from one place to another...

My big question is... why doesn't cap just wear the wings when he needs to get around. Paint them red white and blue and call it Captain Eagle flight mode?

Edited by Gakken85
Posted

^ No more so than Hawkeye or any number of random dudes running around in costume with no extraordinary abilities (Batman being an exemplary exception).

-b.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...