Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I lived in the UK when I was younger, I was about 13 or 14 when I was at RAF Cosford but I was more focused on the air show at the time than the static displays, I don't even recall viewing the TSR.2.  I need to make a trip there when I go back to the UK, it's only 45 mins away from my parent's place.

I visited the National Museum of the USAF in Dayton Ohio in September, a phenomenal place.  Really happy I was able to see the YF-23 in person.  

IMG_5570.JPG

Posted

Thanks for the great pic, like the TSR-2 itself, the YF-23 still looks like its from an alternate timeline... I've never made it to Cosford, though I have been to Duxford though not for some years. I keep meaning to make a return trip but its sort of the wrong side of London to make it straightforward getting there from where I am.

Posted

That is indeed one of the X-29A's peeking in my shot, I like how they suspended the aircraft from the ceiling and you're able to walk under it, though my photo makes it seem closer than it really was.

IMG_5552.JPG

IMG_5553.JPG

Posted
On 1/3/2025 at 1:30 PM, renegadeleader1 said:

X-29. The BeeDee is at Pima Air & Space Museum.

IMG_20230515_113424.jpg

I helped restore that plane as a senior project.

  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

It doesn't have to look pretty, or mean, to work. That being said, get it in someone's sights and it's not going to last long. Converted freighter's aren't made to survive combat, no matter how fully they are converted.

But still, this could start a naval trend. Why spend billions on one massive aircraft carrier when you get a handful of some smaller (and more expendable) ones at a quarter the cost.

Edited by Thom
Posted
12 hours ago, Thom said:

It doesn't have to look pretty, or mean, to work. That being said, get it in someone's sights and it's not going to last long. Converted freighter's aren't made to survive combat, no matter how fully they are converted.

But still, this could start a naval trend. Why spend billions on one massive aircraft carrier when you get a handful of some smaller (and more expendable) ones at a quarter the cost.

It can only launch small drones and helicopters.  And I love how their 60% scale UCAVs are just smaller versions of their super duper "stealth fighter."

  • 1 month later...
Posted
7 minutes ago, Bolt said:

So i guess the next gen fighter is going to be built by Boeing F-47..

Something about F-47 just doesn't roll off the togue... feels forced. By the time they get this thing airborne & into production, a Gen 7 aircraft will be in the works.

Posted

Eh, don't underestimate the Air Force to put out something custom ordered in a hurry.  Not having to manage multiple sets of armed forces and export partner requirements will let it move a whole lot faster than the F-35 could ever hope to achieve.

Not discounting the Boeing issues, but I have to admit I'm happy seeing something not being handed out to Lockheed for a change.

Posted
2 hours ago, 505thAirborne said:

Something about F-47 just doesn't roll off the togue... feels forced

Ya, i thought the same thing.

Should be interesting .  Seen so many AI "next gen" fighters already , I'm willing to bet Boeing is gonna throw out something we've already seen. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Valkyrie Hunter D said:

Yeah, but F-47 Putin just sounds weird.

Haha! 
I'm thinking Kawamori just needs to designate the next VF the Four-oh !

Posted
On 1/3/2025 at 10:36 AM, Model-Junkie said:

I lived in the UK when I was younger, I was about 13 or 14 when I was at RAF Cosford but I was more focused on the air show at the time than the static displays, I don't even recall viewing the TSR.2.  I need to make a trip there when I go back to the UK, it's only 45 mins away from my parent's place.

I visited the National Museum of the USAF in Dayton Ohio in September, a phenomenal place.  Really happy I was able to see the YF-23 in person.  

IMG_5570.JPG

And to think that the USAF chose the other model because it was "prettier" than the YF-23.
Which ended up being a bad choice, since its maintenance costs twice as much as the price of the fighter itself.

Posted
25 minutes ago, Bolt said:

Haha! 
I'm thinking Kawamori just needs to designate the next VF the Four-oh !

We need transformable fighter jets. Maybe if someone used niobium (Brazilian joke), they could have built one a long time ago.

Posted

I‘m confused why the NGAD contract is going to Boeing. I thought they are Going to develop the F-18 successor for the Navy.

What is Lockheed-Martin supposed to build once all the F-35 are built?

Hopefully Boeing learned from its defeat in the JSF program and designed a beautiful looking jet.

Posted
6 hours ago, Scyla said:

I‘m confused why the NGAD contract is going to Boeing.

 

Because we live in the hell timeline.

Posted
18 hours ago, Bolt said:

Seen so many AI "next gen" fighters already , I'm willing to bet Boeing is gonna throw out something we've already seen. 

I typed F-47 Boeing, and these lovely AI renders popped up in the google search. 

image.png.83b235f59b12d9d28d1f36cde759683e.png

image.png.1e5f9504755f58ef0a00882644874e14.png

Posted
6 hours ago, Scyla said:

I thought they are Going to develop the F-18 successor for the Navy.

Technically they did; the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet...which they inherited when they bought McDonnell Douglas.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...