Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

LIKE 

A

BOSS

Extrodinary airmanship! Watch the whole video to see what he dealt with 😳

Chris

Posted (edited)

Wow, that could have been so much worse, that plane could have crashed into more than a few aircraft in the front of the deck if it slid the wrong way.  Or if he drifted a bit to either side, wipe out planes to his left.  
 

did I see correctly, looks like he ejected right before the plane started to spin.   Wonder what caused the pilot to be low by that much, another few meters and he wouldn’t have even been on the deck.

Edited by kalvasflam
Posted

That was a hard hit, like 'nam era hard hit and crash.  Pilot clearly ejected, but I will say this, whoever leaked that video better be careful, there's a board in their future.

Posted

A massive settle at the ramp... wonder what caused it.

1 hour ago, Knight26 said:

whoever leaked that video better be careful, there's a board in their future.

Yep:ph34r:

Posted (edited)

Especially when you can hear some of the conversation in the background. Probably won’t be hard to determine who was in the room. 

Chris
 

Edited by Dobber
Posted

It's honestly amazing the F-35 appeared to remain so intact from such a hard impact. I also wonder if the pilot was using the auto-landing software that's been around for awhile or was landing manually. 

Posted (edited)

Maintenance crews are pissed because of all the dust and crap that got knocked loose in the air ducts from that impact and now they have to clean up all the dirty spaces. Lol

Chris

Edited by Dobber
Posted

Military technology has always been this weird blend of cutting edge and yesterdays news, especially electronic wise. I suspect many non-military organisations are the same, you use what  works as long as it does the job until its no longer practical or sustainable to do so. They'll get new deck cameras when a) they can no longer be maintained b) theres budget to do so and c) maybe when the ship next goes in for refit. Theres also d) which is any new system better not interfere with all the gazillion other things on the ship that might break if something changes.

Posted
55 minutes ago, F-ZeroOne said:

Military technology has always been this weird blend of cutting edge and yesterdays news, especially electronic wise. I suspect many non-military organisations are the same, you use what  works as long as it does the job until its no longer practical or sustainable to do so. They'll get new deck cameras when a) they can no longer be maintained b) theres budget to do so and c) maybe when the ship next goes in for refit. Theres also d) which is any new system better not interfere with all the gazillion other things on the ship that might break if something changes.

This is all true.  I see this kind of thing all the time.  First launcher I worked on, the most modern one at the time, still used parts from old Trident Missile Launchers.

Posted

Remember, ICBM launch systems are still using 8” floppies on ancient PCs that cannot connect to the internet.  It’s called operational security.

I doubt if modern day hackers even know the code for these computers.

Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, derex3592 said:

I'm sorrry, ... In the days of 8K cameras and monitors, THAT is the best the US Navy has for carrier deck camera footage??? Jeeez....

 

You want 8k footage of a screwup that cost many millions in taxpayer dollars?

Me too!! ... but the Department of the US Navy sure doesn't:rofl:

Edited by slide
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
18 hours ago, Valkyrie Hunter D said:

 There's no way the Ukranian president can be evacuated now.  No other plane can carry his huge balls.

That must be F-Putin's real problem. Envy!

Posted

New photos have emerged supposedly showing the An-225s tail sticking out of the hangar, though the hangar itself has been damaged at the front, so its just possible its not gone yet.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 3/2/2022 at 11:22 AM, reddsun1 said:

Urmagurd!  I'd never heard of this before!  

 

It's a real life galldang Logan!

logan_guardian.gif

I wonder if the casualty rate is the same as the Logan? :lol:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...