plutoniumhunter Posted February 14, 2013 Posted February 14, 2013 Nice Phantom picture! It's like one of my childhood legends. I agree with David as well, kind of lost track of all the Flanker variants after the -27, -30, -33... Quote
505thAirborne Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw0gjw1XIIk&feature=youtu.be Quote
electric indigo Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 Meteorite or Zetraedi invasion? News at 11! Quote
505thAirborne Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 Meteorite or Zetraedi invasion? News at 11! Definitely the SDF-1 headed for South Ataria Island Quote
LOW_ALT Posted February 15, 2013 Posted February 15, 2013 I'm not gonna say it was aliens....but aliens man, aliens Quote
David Hingtgen Posted February 18, 2013 Author Posted February 18, 2013 At least a few people here should get this: Quote
David Hingtgen Posted February 20, 2013 Author Posted February 20, 2013 Interesting at 4:30, very interesting at 6:43. Quote
robodragon Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 Top story in the Fresno Bee this AM. Fresno to get F-35's to replace F-18. That's a joke right? The F-35 is going to replace the F-18's? Yeah I'm sure that's a punch line to some bad joke. LOL http://www.fresnobee.com/2013/02/19/3180020/lemoore-navy-base-gets-early-nod.html Quote
505thAirborne Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 All of those Super Hornet pilots must be thrilled! Quote
renegadeleader1 Posted February 20, 2013 Posted February 20, 2013 Interesting at 4:30, very interesting at 6:43. Okay did you see the same thing I did? Quote
Bowen Posted February 21, 2013 Posted February 21, 2013 *snip* Tomcat: Miss me yet? I think there's something in my eye... ;_; Quote
505thAirborne Posted February 21, 2013 Posted February 21, 2013 Been missing my beloved Tomcat for a long time now... Quote
Chronocidal Posted February 21, 2013 Posted February 21, 2013 (edited) Top story in the Fresno Bee this AM. Fresno to get F-35's to replace F-18. That's a joke right? The F-35 is going to replace the F-18's? Yeah I'm sure that's a punch line to some bad joke. LOL http://www.fresnobee.com/2013/02/19/3180020/lemoore-navy-base-gets-early-nod.html No joke, but they're talking about Lemoore, not Fresno. Fresno's ANG base has had F-16s for a long time. Anyway though, they're talking about legacy hornets, F-18C/D models, which the JSF will replace eventually.Not going to replace the superhornets anytime soon, especially not at Lemoore, since I think that's basically the west coast headquarters for superhornet operations and training. I think someone in congress has been trying to float the idea of a multi-service base, consolidating the Fresno ANG and Lemoore NAS aircraft into one area. Makes some sense, due to the land-locked nature of KFAT, and the relatively remote location of LNAS, but I don't expect it to happen any time soon. Edited February 21, 2013 by Chronocidal Quote
electric indigo Posted February 21, 2013 Posted February 21, 2013 Been missing my beloved Tomcat for a long time now... Don't worry, they're in good hands... Quote
robodragon Posted February 21, 2013 Posted February 21, 2013 No joke, but they're talking about Lemoore, not Fresno. Fresno's ANG base has had F-16s for a long time. Anyway though, they're talking about legacy hornets, F-18C/D models, which the JSF will replace eventually. Not going to replace the superhornets anytime soon, especially not at Lemoore, since I think that's basically the west coast headquarters for superhornet operations and training. I think someone in congress has been trying to float the idea of a multi-service base, consolidating the Fresno ANG and Lemoore NAS aircraft into one area. Makes some sense, due to the land-locked nature of KFAT, and the relatively remote location of LNAS, but I don't expect it to happen any time soon. Yeah I meant Lemoore, Just had a brain fart and typed Fresno. I thinks that's a sign I've been here (Fresno) to long. I guess at some point I'll be seeing 35s over head instead of the 18s when they come over from LNAS. The article said beginning 2017 and full replacement by 2028. Quote
Uxi Posted February 22, 2013 Posted February 22, 2013 Finally got a Testors/Italeri YF-23 off evilbay for a reasonable price. Gonna build a PAV-1 out of it. Really wish Hasegawa would do a modern mold/sculpt, so an accurate PAV-2, if not an EMD. Quote
LOW_ALT Posted February 22, 2013 Posted February 22, 2013 Don't worry, they're in good hands... Looks like De Niro in the middle there lol Quote
Chronocidal Posted February 22, 2013 Posted February 22, 2013  Yeah I meant Lemoore, Just had a brain fart and typed Fresno. I thinks that's a sign I've been here (Fresno) to long. I guess at some point I'll be seeing 35s over head instead of the 18s when they come over from LNAS. The article said beginning 2017 and full replacement by 2028. Hehe, I grew up in Hanford, know the feeling. The superbugs will be around for a long time yet though, they're only talking about replacing the old model hornets. Maintenance costs for those oldies are skyrocketing, because all the focus is shifting to the E/F/G model hornets. Gonna be really weird when/if the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds both start flying the F-35... they've had the 16s and 18s for so long now. Quote
MechTech Posted February 22, 2013 Posted February 22, 2013 A buddy told me the older Hornets weren't holding up either as originally expected. The last two wars put more hours on the airframes than expected and they had to retire a lot of them very early. It's sad seeing that old Tomcat in Iranian hands. They supposedly tried to maintain them and fix them, but with their current leadeship hating the free world, I miss the old Itolah days when they were buds and NOT trying to nuke the free world. That footage of the F-7U with that dude jumping out in front of it was crazy! The pilot probably lost his concentration when that dude ran out like that! - MT Quote
Lightning Posted February 22, 2013 Posted February 22, 2013 I think the guy already knew something was up before he bailed from his post. I wouldn't mind seeing more Phantom pics! <3 Quote
Chronocidal Posted February 22, 2013 Posted February 22, 2013 Yeah, the old F7U was notoriously bad for carrier ops. Horribly underpowered, and the engines were unreliable on top of that. Apparently a sizable number were lost on failed catapult launches because the engines flamed out. The ludicrously high nose gear and crazy angle of attack needed for landing didn't help either. What's actually amusing.. my dad owns a couple 1/72 kits of the Cutlass, and has compared some part sizes with the idea in mind to make a next-generation version of sorts, sort of a 70s era revamp of the design. If the internal ducting in the kit is accurate, it looks like you could literally just take out the old engines, and replace them with modern F-18C/D turbofans with very minor changes. I always loved the design of the prototype, which had an actual streamlined cockpit, but that huge bubble nose ruined it. Quote
mechaninac Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 It's sad seeing that old Tomcat in Iranian hands. They supposedly tried to maintain them and fix them, but with their current leadeship hating the free world, I miss the old Itolah days when they were buds and NOT trying to nuke the free world. I think you mean the Shah. The ayatollah (Khomeini) was the instigator/inspiration for the revolution that caused the deterioration of Iran's relations with the western world which has brought us to the sad state of affairs we find ourselves in today. It was very unfortunate that those Tomcats were lost to the Islamic take-over. I remember a Heavy Metal episode about the Tomcat, on the History Channel, where they mentioned unconfirmed reports that Grumman's crew of technicians, who were in-country to train the Iranian pilots and maintenance crews how to service the F-14s at the time of the revolution, sabotaged the birds by removing key avionics and other vital equipment, rendering the fighters innoperable... and since the new Iranian regime could no longer get support and parts to make the Tomcats flight ready, not to mention the know-how, they just sort of went into a forced mothballing from which they've never emerged. Quote
Fatalist Posted February 23, 2013 Posted February 23, 2013 Anyone really surprised? http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/f-35-grounding-latest-setback-for-troubled-program-87953.html#ixzz2Let51KbV Quote
David Hingtgen Posted February 23, 2013 Author Posted February 23, 2013 A buddy told me the older Hornets weren't holding up either as originally expected. The last two wars put more hours on the airframes than expected and they had to retire a lot of them very early.That's highly related to the F/A-18A+ program. Since the "C" came out quite soon after the "A" a lot of A's were sent to reserve/training squadrons, and thus saw little combat, high-weight flying, carrier landings, etc. While the C's have been at war almost constantly. Thus, most A's are effectively "younger" than C's nowadays, when it comes to wear/tear/stress etc. So the A's are being upgraded with C avionics and engines, as they are the newest airframes available--in a manner of speaking. (they certainly have the most "useful life remaining") Quote
hutch Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Was in Turkey this last week, got to hang around a bunch of F-16s and F-4s and see a lot of F-4s in flight. Was a blast. Quote
hutch Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 All JSF Operations suspended http://www.f-16.net/news_article4704.html Quote
David Hingtgen Posted February 24, 2013 Author Posted February 24, 2013 "The F-35 will deliver 90% of the F-22's performance at half the cost". Bet they wish they'd just bought more F-22's, now... Conspiracy theory: The program is being intentionally sabotaged etc to send the message that manned fighters really are too complicated and expensive to make any more, and we should just have zillions of cheap drones instead of fewer more capable planes. Quote
MechTech Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 Yeah, the Shah, my mistake. I still remember watching them tear up his body as "tribute" to his greatness after he died!!?? The American public was like "what the heck is wrong with these people!" We were about to deliver the Kidd class destroyers to them too before that all went down. We just absorbed them into our Navy then. That 747 that went down some years ago was an ex tanker they had too. It's amazing how one guy can change the course of a nation! That's interesting about the F-18A's being upgraded. I thought they would have phased them out by now. Even withsome making it into private hands. I thought the EA-6B's were phased out too, but they're still around as well. Those Cutlasses look awesome in the Black Tiger Scheme. Too bad it's just modeling and Photoshop! The Cutlass was one of my favorite designs growing up. It was a combination of hight tech airframe - lower tech engines. Any plane you keep the canopy open to quickly escape from if the launch fails can't be good! - MT Quote
David Hingtgen Posted February 24, 2013 Author Posted February 24, 2013 The F/A-18A+ is the best version of the Legacy Hornet there is now. Lowest weight, most modern avionics, and most powerful engines. Export Hornets tend to have the better engines but not the avionics. Late-build US C's are the opposite. Quote
renegadeleader1 Posted February 24, 2013 Posted February 24, 2013 (edited) Yeah, the Shah, my mistake. I still remember watching them tear up his body as "tribute" to his greatness after he died!!?? The American public was like "what the heck is wrong with these people!" We were about to deliver the Kidd class destroyers to them too before that all went down. We just absorbed them into our Navy then. That 747 that went down some years ago was an ex tanker they had too. It's amazing how one guy can change the course of a nation! That's interesting about the F-18A's being upgraded. I thought they would have phased them out by now. Even withsome making it into private hands. I thought the EA-6B's were phased out too, but they're still around as well. Those Cutlasses look awesome in the Black Tiger Scheme. Too bad it's just modeling and Photoshop! The Cutlass was one of my favorite designs growing up. It was a combination of hight tech airframe - lower tech engines. Any plane you keep the canopy open to quickly escape from if the launch fails can't be good! - MT 1.The Shah of Iran never returned to his home country. He passed away in Egypt and interred at a mosque there.2.I'm pretty sure those aren't Cutlasses in that Black Tiger photo. Either that or heavily edited. Edited February 24, 2013 by renegadeleader1 Quote
electric indigo Posted February 25, 2013 Posted February 25, 2013 2.I'm pretty sure those aren't Cutlasses in that Black Tiger photo. Either that or heavily edited. Hint: One tail fin is missing. Taken from here. Quote
hutch Posted March 2, 2013 Posted March 2, 2013 F-35s cleared for service http://www.f-16.net/news_article4705.html US buys A-29 Super Toscano's for Afghanistan http://defense-update.com/20130228_las_a-29_super_tucano.html Quote
mechaninac Posted March 2, 2013 Posted March 2, 2013 @F-35s cleared for service: Cool, it appears that the problem that prompted the grounding was a one-off; the blade apparently cracked due to a material and/or machining flaw, and not a design one -- this is not unheard of as an undetected microscopic flaw in the metal or a minor manufacturing goof that's not caught immediately can create a failure several months, or years, or decades later depending on stresses encountered. @US buys A-29 Super Tucanos for Afghanistan: Just follow your nose... and why aren't the Afgans paying for them? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.