Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'll probably pick one up regardless (provided the orders aren't another stupid limited release disaster), but I've got more than enough parts to rebuild it into something that feels more substantial and functional, like an actual vehicle loading bay instead of an open-air trailer.

Edited by Chronocidal
Posted (edited)
On 12/19/2024 at 9:50 AM, danth said:

In the video, the designer shows the drop ship fall very quickly and swooshes the ship away. I don't think he got the memo on 18+ Icons sets. Adult Icons sets should have interesting, well thought out mechanisms that don't sacrifice the overall integrity of the design for an "action" feature. Just dropping an exposed buggy out of an otherwise empty mid section of the ship -- that belongs in a kid's action theme, not in Icons.

The buggy doesn't even look like it fits snugly into the ship's midsection. It just hangs back an entire stud behind the front cross beam. If the front of the buggy sat on and hid the crossbeam, it would feel like, hey, someone carefully designed this. As it is, it just looks haphazard.

TBF, Jae holds the ship almost vertical to retract the gears and the buggy stays in place. It would've been cool had he done a roll with it just to prove that it's secure, but after watching the vid, I'm feeling confident that the buggy won't arbitrarily fall out. Of course, that does little to ameliorate my disappointment that the box element is altogether missing. I can't smite that deceased Equus enough. On a side note, while I appreciate the 'B' build, it just doesn't say Alienator to me, either. I've seen MOCs over the years that did it better, IMHO. I really wish Mike Psiaki had been the designer. His update to the Galaxy Explorer introduced an interesting way to realize the superstructure and the wingplan all while still retaining the essential look and features of the original ship, as well as adding some new ones. It's a masterclass in approach to creating an update of a vintage model. However, no model is created in a vacuum; even the most experienced designers still get feedback from other designers as well as other folks throughout the process of bringing a model to production, and with Jae being a new designer and this being his first Icons model, I'm sure there were many eyes on it and lots of feedback sought and given along the way. That it made its way through all those checks without having some fundamental changes made to hew it closer to the OG ship is telling for future vintage Space updates. Check your expectations.

edit: After posting, I checked out Duckbricks' review in which he turns the ship completely upside down and the buggy remains secure. Oddly, he continually reiterates that the GWP Blacktron Cruiser set from earlier this year is cross-compatible when Jae the designer of the new Renegade said it is not due to differences in the clip systems utilized for modularity.

Edited by M'Kyuun
Posted
1 hour ago, Chronocidal said:

I'll probably pick one up regardless (provided the orders aren't another stupid limited release disaster), but I've got more than enough parts to rebuild it into something that feels more substantial and functional, like an actual vehicle loading bay instead of an open-air trailer.

I'll likely try to get two copies. I don't hate it, but I sure do wish Jae hadn't sacrificed the central cargo box to the gods of creative liberties. I haven't looked much elsewhere online, but I'm curious if there are similar sentiments coming from the fandom. If so, I kinda feel bad for Jae, as he seems rather passionate about Classic Space and wanted to put a new spin on the old set. Unfortunately, no one told him along the way that perhaps the box and the double cargo doors in the back should remain as essential play features.

Posted
22 hours ago, M'Kyuun said:

TBF, Jae holds the ship almost vertical to retract the gears and the buggy stays in place.

edit: After posting, I checked out Duckbricks' review in which he turns the ship completely upside down and the buggy remains secure.

I don't think I made my point very well. I wasn't worried about the buggy staying in place.

I was just saying that the feature seemed to be focused on the "action" element. You fly low and drop off your buggy in one quick swoosh. Unlike the Galaxy Explorer where you have to first land, open the rear doors, and then pull out the ramp. The former seems more fitting for a kids action theme than an 18+ Icons set. Whereas fiddling with functional bay doors and ramps might appeal more to us older "kids".

22 hours ago, M'Kyuun said:

 Oddly, he continually reiterates that the GWP Blacktron Cruiser set from earlier this year is cross-compatible when Jae the designer of the new Renegade said it is not due to differences in the clip systems utilized for modularity.

I noticed that too! Weird.

Posted
14 minutes ago, danth said:

I don't think I made my point very well. I wasn't worried about the buggy staying in place.

I was just saying that the feature seemed to be focused on the "action" element. You fly low and drop off your buggy in one quick swoosh. Unlike the Galaxy Explorer where you have to first land, open the rear doors, and then pull out the ramp. The former seems more fitting for a kids action theme than an 18+ Icons set. Whereas fiddling with functional bay doors and ramps might appeal more to us older "kids".

Ah, I see your point now. Sometimes the ole cranium is like that lab door in Tron. I concede your point and, too, would have preferred a removable box and double doors at the rear, like the original, as well a fold out ramp akin to that on 10497 Galaxy Explorer. The air drop mechanism is cool in its own right, but IMHO, neither fitting for this particular model nor as engaging, practical, or fun as the original's box and door setup.

19 minutes ago, danth said:

II noticed that too! Weird.

I would assume, perhaps erroneously, that Chris, the owner and host of Duckbricks, who himself has been to Billund numerous times for unveilings of new sets and interviews with their designers, keeps abreast of what other reviewers, especially those of Tiago's stature as a former designer himself, are posting. Chris himself is friends with a number of LEGO designers and is generally well-informed on his subjects. Having watched Tiago's interview before Duckbricks', I was a bit surprised that Chris continued his assurances that the GWP Cruiser, an update to the original Blacktron Invader, was compatible with the new Renegade. I'm sure he owns that set (he has over 6000 LEGO sets in his collection and intends to found a LEGO Museum) as he often receives full waves of sets free from LEGO to review as well as specialty items. I guess that only proves he's human like the rest of us. 

Posted

I've been building my own Speed Champions lately, finishing up a couple of legends of LeMans - the venerable Porsche 962c and the revolutionary Mazda 787b:

20241220_222816.jpg.b848012bf4b1b941f1e2a0c901272854.jpg

20241220_222944.jpg.0d9934c552b78fc2e90cce374df479e1.jpg

20241220_223124.jpg.07405c0f22cf2ddee882d493b07d7cee.jpg

20241220_222224.jpg.522e93603ea2e41acea25968822e8e20.jpg

20241220_222400.jpg.7f98421454e2977cedb9528c37744199.jpg

20241220_222016.jpg.e1e0d7c7c4b0badeca142b038059e2a0.jpg

These original designs by SFH Bricks and custom decals make these builds on par with the Speed Champions line, which makes me glad I don't have to wait for LEGO to make their official versions.  The decals are quite well done.  They even have some for the minifig drivers:

20241220_223451.jpg.065035208bbffa1b85815d1a5b800ecf.jpg

I fallen down deep into the rabbit hole with 8-stud wide builds of fine autos.  More to come!

Posted (edited)

While poking around to try and figure out why the 2025 Blacktron Renegade looks off, I stumbled across the following pictures showing the Cruiser and Renegade clips, and clipped together:

LegoBlackTronRenegade01.jpg.feeea57d7e59eb453f43b5fc05641e0a.jpg

Source: Jay Ong's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jayong28/p/DDw8DqWPivq/?img_index=1

 

As for why the Renegade looks off: the overall silhouette (in red) is octagonal, whereas the original was more diamond-shaped.  In addition, the 'bulky bits' (in green) are arranged in an H shape on the new one, while the original was a rectangle.

LegoBlackTronRenegade02.jpg.308cba76bb749d55f38757223f55d246.jpg

As the new Galaxy Explorer is fundamentally the exact same shape as the original—just bigger!—one wonders why the Blacktron Renegade's shape was so drastically changed...  Perhaps the Lego group will have much better sales if they didn't market it as the Renegade, but as an entirely new Blacktron ship? 🙄

 

Edited by sketchley
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, sketchley said:

While poking around to try and figure out why the 2025 Blacktron Renegade looks off, I stumbled across the following pictures showing the Cruiser and Renegade clips, and clipped together:

LegoBlackTronRenegade01.jpg.feeea57d7e59eb453f43b5fc05641e0a.jpg

Source: Jay Ong's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jayong28/p/DDw8DqWPivq/?img_index=8

 

This... makes no sense to me.  Why would they specifically design the two linkages using exact opposite setups?  It's not like it's hard to modify them at all...

Otherwise though, I'm really getting tired of these clip systems.  They might hold well enough, but why is it so hard to just pin things together with technic pins like we've been doing for roughly forty years?  Did they discontinue the bricks with permanent pegs attached?

Whatever the situation though, I do hope I can pick up a pair of these.  I just want to extend the design and scale it up more faithfully like the Explorer set.

Edited by Chronocidal
Posted
7 hours ago, Chronocidal said:

Why would they specifically design the two linkages using exact opposite setups?

It's not that they're opposite, it's that the linkages on the Cruiser are gendered and the ones on the Renegade are androgynous.

Posted

I'm really torn on this new Renegade. I'm feeling lots of nostalgia for it but I'm really let down by some of the design choices. At first glance, it just looked "off" somehow. As I read all of the above posts, I realized exactly why it looked that way to me. Thanks for the great explanation, @sketchley

Anyway, I feel as if I get this, then I'm going to have to track down and buy the original. Then I'll have to track down and buy the whole original Blacktron line. I only have so much disposable income! 

Posted (edited)
On 12/20/2024 at 10:56 PM, Valkyrie Hunter D said:

I've been building my own Speed Champions lately, finishing up a couple of legends of LeMans - the venerable Porsche 962c and the revolutionary Mazda 787b:

20241220_222816.jpg.b848012bf4b1b941f1e2a0c901272854.jpg

20241220_222944.jpg.0d9934c552b78fc2e90cce374df479e1.jpg

20241220_223124.jpg.07405c0f22cf2ddee882d493b07d7cee.jpg

20241220_222224.jpg.522e93603ea2e41acea25968822e8e20.jpg

20241220_222400.jpg.7f98421454e2977cedb9528c37744199.jpg

20241220_222016.jpg.e1e0d7c7c4b0badeca142b038059e2a0.jpg

These original designs by SFH Bricks and custom decals make these builds on par with the Speed Champions line, which makes me glad I don't have to wait for LEGO to make their official versions.  The decals are quite well done.  They even have some for the minifig drivers:

20241220_223451.jpg.065035208bbffa1b85815d1a5b800ecf.jpg

I fallen down deep into the rabbit hole with 8-stud wide builds of fine autos.  More to come!

These are brilliant. the white one in particular doesn't even look like LEGO on first glance, so well is the build and the applied livery. Hope you'll share more pics of these. I'm not a car guy, per se, but I enjoy the Speed Champions line quite a bit.

On 12/20/2024 at 11:23 PM, sketchley said:

While poking around to try and figure out why the 2025 Blacktron Renegade looks off, I stumbled across the following pictures showing the Cruiser and Renegade clips, and clipped together:

LegoBlackTronRenegade01.jpg.feeea57d7e59eb453f43b5fc05641e0a.jpg

Source: Jay Ong's Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jayong28/p/DDw8DqWPivq/?img_index=1

 

As for why the Renegade looks off: the overall silhouette (in red) is octagonal, whereas the original was more diamond-shaped.  In addition, the 'bulky bits' (in green) are arranged in an H shape on the new one, while the original was a rectangle.

LegoBlackTronRenegade02.jpg.308cba76bb749d55f38757223f55d246.jpg

As the new Galaxy Explorer is fundamentally the exact same shape as the original—just bigger!—one wonders why the Blacktron Renegade's shape was so drastically changed...  Perhaps the Lego group will have much better sales if they didn't market it as the Renegade, but as an entirely new Blacktron ship? 🙄

 

I appreciate that comparison. Purely from an initial view, the new Renegade is notably much chunkier than the original, which had a more minimalistic skeletal look to its frame that helped it to look sleeker. I, too, wish the designer had opted, like Mike Psiaki's excellent update to the Galaxy Explorer, to maintain a closer appearance to the original ship while enlarging the whole and updating various areas and features accordingly. The new design is a notable departure from the original, made all the more apparent by a side-by-side comparison. I still plan on getting a copy or two, but my enthusiasm is much less for this than what I had and still have for 10497. However, it's Classic Space, and I want them to continue reviving more old Space themes, so I'll be getting at least one.

On 12/20/2024 at 11:35 PM, Chronocidal said:

This... makes no sense to me.  Why would they specifically design the two linkages using exact opposite setups?  It's not like it's hard to modify them at all...

Otherwise though, I'm really getting tired of these clip systems.  They might hold well enough, but why is it so hard to just pin things together with technic pins like we've been doing for roughly forty years?  Did they discontinue the bricks with permanent pegs attached?

Whatever the situation though, I do hope I can pick up a pair of these.  I just want to extend the design and scale it up more faithfully like the Explorer set.

Usually I'm in agreement with your views, Chronocidal; however, I much prefer using the clip and bar connections as opposed to Technic pins, which oft prove to be a royal PITA to engage when two or more are used for a quick disconnect system. So far as the GWP Invader set, oddly renamed Cruiser, goes, I surmise that it was designed independently from the Renegade with little or no bleedover, hence the differences in clipping systems. Fortunately, it shouldn't be too difficult to mod to bring it into compliance with the Renegade's clip system. I oft entertain fantasies of modding sets, but I seldom follow through, even after buying copies of the sets that I intend to mod. I find building my own stuff more fulfilling (and time-consuming) and generally abandon modding efforts. This is a set that could definitely stand some heavy modding to render it closer to the OG set as well as rendering it closer to what 10497 did for the Galaxy Explorer, but I already know that I'll likely never bring myself to do it. However, I'm curious and I look forward to other folks' mods for this thing, as there's a bit of discontentment already swirling and you just know mods are coming.

Edited by M'Kyuun
Posted

Fair, it's not that the clips are a bad system to use, they do offer a lot of compact options in a lot of different configurations, and they definitely hold well.  The Saturn V set makes that pretty clear. ^_^

My general issue with them is just how many of them I've found broken over the years.  They've gone through a few revisions to make the clips sturdier (and I think I still have a few really old ones that are really thin plastic), but it seems like I'm always finding new broken ones on builds I've left on display.  Last time I picked up my Ideas shuttle build, the tail and one wing flap both fell off from broken ones.

They're a really good tool for assembling complex shapes involving angled plates, and great for hinge joints, but using them for something specifically designed to be detached and reattached repeatedly feels like you're just asking to have to order replacements.

Fortunately they're really common, and cheap to order in bulk.  Maybe that's just the way they're being treated now, as disposable parts to be replaced when they wear out. :huh:

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chronocidal said:

Fair, it's not that the clips are a bad system to use, they do offer a lot of compact options in a lot of different configurations, and they definitely hold well.  The Saturn V set makes that pretty clear. ^_^

My general issue with them is just how many of them I've found broken over the years.  They've gone through a few revisions to make the clips sturdier (and I think I still have a few really old ones that are really thin plastic), but it seems like I'm always finding new broken ones on builds I've left on display.  Last time I picked up my Ideas shuttle build, the tail and one wing flap both fell off from broken ones.

The Saturn V is an exemplary set for use of clip and bar joints. Just a brilliant set.

I find it alarming that you've had so many clip breakages; I keep a lot of sets out on display and to whit I've never had an issue yet with broken clips. Add to that my numerous transforming MOCs which I manipulate and put on public display every year.

However, I've noticed a lessening of clutch power in some parts with clips of late. I built a pumpkin that turns into a spider and it relies heavily on the skeleton arms to effect motion in a goodly portion of the model. I gave my last good model of it away this last BrickCon and ordered enough parts to build two more from LEGO's online PAB. I've built at least six copies of this thing since the original in 2019, which itself went through probably a hundred or more transformations at a convention before I gave it to its intended owner. Even after all that manipulation, all the joints were still tight, and thus it was for pretty much every other model I built of it until just recently. I did a lot of mixing and matching of various parts with bars and skeleton arms before finally finding a group that only somewhat have the collective clutch power of every previous version. I'm not sure what's going on, but it's frustrating. I could blame it on mold fatigue, but I even resorted to digging into my parts stash for older parts that I've had for years and the problem persisted. I keep my parts at room temp (around 77 degrees Fahrenheit) and that temp doesn't swing much in either direction throughout the year. I think the problem lies with the skeleton arms, but I'm not sure why I'm experiencing the same weakness in my older parts when I never did before. It's weird. However, my issue lies more with clutch power than breakages, of which I have had very, very few over the years despite my heavy use of them in my models. 

Posted
On 12/21/2024 at 12:32 AM, danth said:

I stumbled on that independently very early this morning when I couldn't sleep. I was going to post it, but I'm glad I didn't now. Huw Gilliam is a pretty well-known British builder who does a lot of CAD rendered MOCs but also builds the odd model with real brick. Looks like this recoloring is the latter, and IMHO, it's an improvement on the original. I think the cockpit, especially, benefits from the removal of all the yellow, but overall I think the greater use of black throughout improves the model and brings it closer to the original look of Blacktron. I appreciate that he built a central container like the original, but honestly, I'm not really feeling those heavy latticed support elements on top. Huw didn't change the drop mechanism, either, and IMHO, the new Renegade is due for a retrofit of swinging doors and a ramp in the back to bring it closer to the original.

Posted

Keeping the drop-mechanism, but implementing the swinging-rear-doors aspect of the original, would be very difficult I imagine.  Pretty much has to be one or the other.   So, if you want rear doors, you also need to redo the entire center section to have either a drive-in rover, or a slide-in cargo pod.  At which point we might as well just start from scratch, since the entire mid-section needs to be massively re-worked in that case... 

Posted

What I've found most often is that when those clips lose their clutch power, the main cause is tiny fractures in the center of the clip.  They don't shatter outright, but the tension will be lost once that pressure fractures the surface of the clip.  They'll stay that way a long time, but the friction will be gone.

Posted
5 hours ago, Chronocidal said:

What I've found most often is that when those clips lose their clutch power, the main cause is tiny fractures in the center of the clip.  They don't shatter outright, but the tension will be lost once that pressure fractures the surface of the clip.  They'll stay that way a long time, but the friction will be gone.

The concern is that I'm experiencing the lack of clutch power from new, never-used skeleton arms. I turned to my older stock, in fact, because until just recently, I had a higher degree of efficacy from them than new parts.  Even my older parts, which haven't seen much use, are evidencing a reduced clutch power which makes me wonder if it is indeed an environmental issue.

6 hours ago, David Hingtgen said:

Keeping the drop-mechanism, but implementing the swinging-rear-doors aspect of the original, would be very difficult I imagine.  Pretty much has to be one or the other.   So, if you want rear doors, you also need to redo the entire center section to have either a drive-in rover, or a slide-in cargo pod.  At which point we might as well just start from scratch, since the entire mid-section needs to be massively re-worked in that case... 

My thinking is to move the release mechanism's trigger to the forward bulkhead freeing up the engine section to be modded into doors thus mimicking the original's design. I love cargo as a theme and as a design feature; the omittance of the original's cargo box to house the land vehicle is a strike against this set as an update. That's a fair bit of playability lost: loading and unloading the vehicle into the box, loading and unloading the box itself, which requires the additional feature of opening doors and the possibility of a ramp, and finally, the modularity of the box to be incorporated into another smaller ship utilizing the cockpit and a single engine component. With further modification, both the air drop feature and a land-based cargo door/ramp features would expand the playability of the design by a fair margin and bring it closer to the original set in its characteristics. I wouldn't mind applying these and other modifications in an effort to render it a much more faithful, albeit properly upgraded, version of the original Blacktron Renegade. While modding is not at all my strong suit, as I tend to concentrate on variable mecha, as an owner of the original set there's a part of me that's a bit discontented with this new Renegade, especially when looking at the excellent execution of 10497 Galaxy Explorer compared to the original 497/928. This set misses the mark in a few areas.

Posted

Got the new Galactic Modular Spaceship from Lego's "City Space" line alongside the Science Mech polybag kit.

 

The GMS was a fascinating build as the instructions have you building the individual modules as separate the separate builds and not the main spaceship that graces the box cover. The only down side is with either builds you are going to end up with leftover part you can't store in the other version. Either the walls of the living habitat or the connection bricks that reinforce the pins holding the big ship together.

The photos are also a little misleading making you thing two minifigs can fit in the cockpit when there's room for only one and one of the little alien guys with the spacesuit that also came in the Science Lab set.

 

Also despite the airlock system the ship uses you really can't have minifigs pass through the habitat module to the cockpit with some modifications as the build just doesn't allow it. The pilot can't even access the second section of the ship module from the cockpit due to how the ship is designed.

 

All that is just nitpicking. Overall it's a great build and very swooshable.

IMG_20250101_224339.jpg

Posted
On 1/1/2025 at 10:22 PM, renegadeleader1 said:

Got the new Galactic Modular Spaceship from Lego's "City Space" line alongside the Science Mech polybag kit.

 

The GMS was a fascinating build as the instructions have you building the individual modules as separate the separate builds and not the main spaceship that graces the box cover. The only down side is with either builds you are going to end up with leftover part you can't store in the other version. Either the walls of the living habitat or the connection bricks that reinforce the pins holding the big ship together.

The photos are also a little misleading making you thing two minifigs can fit in the cockpit when there's room for only one and one of the little alien guys with the spacesuit that also came in the Science Lab set.

 

Also despite the airlock system the ship uses you really can't have minifigs pass through the habitat module to the cockpit with some modifications as the build just doesn't allow it. The pilot can't even access the second section of the ship module from the cockpit due to how the ship is designed.

 

All that is just nitpicking. Overall it's a great build and very swooshable.

IMG_20250101_224339.jpg

 Appreciate the brief commentary. Mine's on its way from Denmark along with the new Blacktron Renegade. I visited my local Wally today hoping to find a lot of the 2025 sets and the series 27 CMFs, but they didn't have the CMFs nor the new Space mech polybag (they had one of a toucan, though) nor either of the large spaceships. Glad I ordered them, as I'll likely have them in hand next week. Meanwhile, I've been staying busy building the two 'B' models for the Dreamzzz Mateo and Z-Blob the Knight Battle Mech set. I'll be building the 'A' model soon, but IMHO both 'B' models were 'A' model-worthy designs themselves. I've been wanting this set all year and I resisted the temptation to order it earlier so I'd have something to request of my wife for Christmas. We lucked out and I got the display copy, their last, at one of our Barnes and Noble stores, the only place I've seen this set, including our LEGO Store downtown, all year. Happy to have it at last, and happier still that it was such a well-executed set with really enjoyable alternate models. The other set my wife got me is the Dark Falcon, and I'm looking forward to putting that one together, too. I just couldn't resist having a white Darth Vader fig in my collection, and the rest of the paradoxical characters in this set are also welcome additions. For those who don't know, the Dark Falcon is based on a design from the LEGO Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy series on Disney Plus, a typically humorous and 'alternate universe' take on the galaxy far, far away that we all know and love. It's well done and worth a watch IMHO. And as a bonus, Mark Hamill voices Luke Skywalker.

19 hours ago, shazam said:

Lego full build: R-104 Metal Heart

https://galacticplastics.com/metalheart

 

I've seen some of Nick's builds in person at BrickCon in Seattle. I believe I even spoke to him once, but this was years ago and I was blissfully unaware of the extraordinary talent in whose presence I was basking at the time. I hope he comes to BrickCon again in the future so I can hopefully convey my awe. Concerning this and his other models, one need only spend a minute or two watching his assembly video to understand that you're seeing talent on a rare level. I wish that LEGO would release builds on this level in their 18+ line, as they'd make for some truly interesting, immersive, and challenging builds for those of us who are already building at a high level. I'm no slouch with the brick, but Nick is truly stratospheric in his ability to use LEGO in novel and creative ways and I'm simply left gobsmacked with every frame, and I'm humbled to the point of feeling like an amateur.

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, Test_Pilot_2 said:

OK. I'm going to build this.

That would be great to see. :good:

1 hour ago, M'Kyuun said:

 Appreciate the brief commentary. Mine's on its way from Denmark along with the new Blacktron Renegade. I visited my local Wally today hoping to find a lot of the 2025 sets and the series 27 CMFs, but they didn't have the CMFs nor the new Space mech polybag (they had one of a toucan, though) nor either of the large spaceships. Glad I ordered them, as I'll likely have them in hand next week. Meanwhile, I've been staying busy building the two 'B' models for the Dreamzzz Mateo and Z-Blob the Knight Battle Mech set. I'll be building the 'A' model soon, but IMHO both 'B' models were 'A' model-worthy designs themselves. I've been wanting this set all year and I resisted the temptation to order it earlier so I'd have something to request of my wife for Christmas. We lucked out and I got the display copy, their last, at one of our Barnes and Noble stores, the only place I've seen this set, including our LEGO Store downtown, all year. Happy to have it at last, and happier still that it was such a well-executed set with really enjoyable alternate models. The other set my wife got me is the Dark Falcon, and I'm looking forward to putting that one together, too. I just couldn't resist having a white Darth Vader fig in my collection, and the rest of the paradoxical characters in this set are also welcome additions. For those who don't know, the Dark Falcon is based on a design from the LEGO Star Wars: Rebuild the Galaxy series on Disney Plus, a typically humorous and 'alternate universe' take on the galaxy far, far away that we all know and love. It's well done and worth a watch IMHO. And as a bonus, Mark Hamill voices Luke Skywalker.

I've seen some of Nick's builds in person at BrickCon in Seattle. I believe I even spoke to him once, but this was years ago and I was blissfully unaware of the extraordinary talent in whose presence I was basking at the time. I hope he comes to BrickCon again in the future so I can hopefully convey my awe. Concerning this and his other models, one need only spend a minute or two watching his assembly video to understand that you're seeing talent on a rare level. I wish that LEGO would release builds on this level in their 18+ line, as they'd make for some truly interesting, immersive, and challenging builds for those of us who are already building at a high level. I'm no slouch with the brick, but Nick is truly stratospheric in his ability to use LEGO in novel and creative ways and I'm simply left gobsmacked with every frame, and I'm humbled to the point of feeling like an amateur.

This custom Lego build is a real eye opener. Well thought out and executed. They final design is perfect. The guy is very talented indeed. 

Edited by shazam
Posted
39 minutes ago, Test_Pilot_2 said:

OK. I'm going to build this.

Every success to you! Share your experience, as it's an ambitious project.

Posted
11 hours ago, M'Kyuun said:

Every success to you! Share your experience, as it's an ambitious project.

Thanks man! I have a pretty severe backlog, so it may be a while. I also want to tweak the color pallette to better fit the concept design for the R-104 White Requiem from Final 2. It never made it in-game, but the original concept had a different tone of white with whispy features like a wedding dress or maybe even an angel?

I think this metal heart is an awesome base for the White Requiem.

Posted (edited)

Just went and grabbed a pair of the new Blacktron set, and was happy to see they've revamped the points application system from the last time I used any.

For a while I think you had to buy gift card increments with the points, and then apply them, but now the checkout just comes with an option to apply the points directly as a discount.  I don't know if the value has been adjusted, since it's been a while since I last looked, but I had enough to get one of the Renegades at half price, so I'm fine with that. ^_^ 

I'll probably mash the two sets together to rebuild the center structure, and see what happens from there.  I might be able to combine it with the previous set to give it a better central bay.

Edited by Chronocidal
Posted
13 hours ago, Chronocidal said:

Just went and grabbed a pair of the new Blacktron set, and was happy to see they've revamped the points application system from the last time I used any.

For a while I think you had to buy gift card increments with the points, and then apply them, but now the checkout just comes with an option to apply the points directly as a discount.  I don't know if the value has been adjusted, since it's been a while since I last looked, but I had enough to get one of the Renegade's at half price, so I'm fine with that. ^_^ 

I'll probably mash the two sets together to rebuild the center structure, and see what happens from there.  I might be able to combine it with the previous set to give it a better central bay.

I'm looking forward to seeing what you come up with. I only own one copy at present, and while it's not bad, I do wish the designer had skewed more towards maintaining all the salient features of the original ship, especially the cargo box.

Posted

Ok, I did not expect this.  I never had the Renegade, but I did have the original Blacktron walker this was inspired by. ^_^ 

Pretty loose inspiration, obviously, but that was one of my earliest space sets.

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Chronocidal said:

Ok, I did not expect this.  I never had the Renegade, but I did have the original Blacktron walker this was inspired by. ^_^ 

Pretty loose inspiration, obviously, but that was one of my earliest space sets.

6876-1.jpg

I had a copy of the Alienator as a kid, and I have two of them at present. It's a cool model and, similarly to the new Renegade, this 'B' model misses the mark a bit compared to the original. Like the OG Renegade, the Alienator has a large cargo box that makes up a significant portion of its bulk and it's completely missing on this reimagined version. Too, the shimmying legs and feet of the original, which still look much better to me than the reimagined version, are a bit of an anachronism on a modern take. I understand the intention, but when so many liberties were taken with the rest of the model, it seems moot. Too, I don't particularly care for the look of the legs or feet on the 'B' model. Unlike 10497's 'B' models, which maintained the updated aesthetic of the new Galaxy Explorer applied to its smaller sister ships, this stands starkly independent from its original inspiration for all the wrong reasons, IMHO. Unlike the reimagined Alienator, I like the smaller mech which is its own thing divorced from any previous set. Having built the new Renegade, it just doesn't fill me with the same sense of awe that 10497 did, and still does, I wish they'd had Mike Psiaki design this new Renegade too, keeping the design language he established with 10497, but hewing closer to the original ship's design while making improvements. Alas, it wasn't to be and this is now official, for better or worse. Fortunately, LEGO lends itself to modding for those so inclined.

I think the greatest point of discontentment comes from having seen any number of the Renegade and other Blacktron sets reimagined as really well-done MOCs over the decades, which inspired hope for any future official set. For me, the new set doesn't quite reach the bar that's been established by fans, and so its enjoyment factor is eroded by disappointment.

Edited by M'Kyuun
Posted

Yeah, I get the frustration, it's just an "okay" tribute in a lot of ways.  I'm just enjoying remembering when I got that set, which I think was the only original Blacktron set I picked up before they moved to the second generation of them.

I'll have to see what my brain comes up with, I might actually pull the cargo door panels from the original Alienator to upgrade this set, if they're big enough.  Probably use the yellow canopy part as well.

Posted
8 hours ago, Chronocidal said:

Yeah, I get the frustration, it's just an "okay" tribute in a lot of ways.  I'm just enjoying remembering when I got that set, which I think was the only original Blacktron set I picked up before they moved to the second generation of them.

I'll have to see what my brain comes up with, I might actually pull the cargo door panels from the original Alienator to upgrade this set, if they're big enough.  Probably use the yellow canopy part as well.

Every success in your tinkering.

Posted

Finished building the new Blacktron Renegade and it's alternative walker version. Not a bad build for either one, and much better than the initial skepticism. The rover sits very secure in the middle section even when it's upside down. 

 

Let me know if you guys have any questions.

IMG_20250114_122805.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...