David Hingtgen Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Why can't top-speed runs be done on the Bonneville salt flats? Or does it only "count" if done on asphalt etc? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 Why can't top-speed runs be done on the Bonneville salt flats? Or does it only "count" if done on asphalt etc? Because traction sucks on salt, and keeping your tires behaved at a kajillion horsepower is hard enough on hot, sticky blacktop. Last thing anyone needs is to go sideways at 270mph. Jet-powered cars frequently do speed runs at Bonneville though. Bloodhound SSC is going there I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 22, 2015 Author Share Posted April 22, 2015 Here's another look at the Singer Porsche 911. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 In less boring news, I've had the opportunity to drive a few of the new 2015 Honda Fit with the manual transmission. I can't express how badly I want one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErikElvis Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 In less boring news, I've had the opportunity to drive a few of the new 2015 Honda Fit with the manual transmission. I can't express how badly I want one. I have a 2010 fit and love the car but it does have its problems. worse of which would prob be the road noise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 23, 2015 Author Share Posted April 23, 2015 I have a 2010 fit and love the car but it does have its problems. worse of which would prob be the road noise. Have you changed your tires? Most road noise usually comes from worn or poor quality tires. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 I have a 2010 fit and love the car but it does have its problems. worse of which would prob be the road noise. The 2015 is a drastic improvement here, especially the 6-speed model. (The CVT is noisy as all hell, as CVTs are) Have you changed your tires? Most road noise usually comes from worn or poor quality tires. That's true in most cars, but the Fit is notorious for being noisy, because a low bottom line leaves little room for sound deadening. Quiet tires will help, but they'll only go so far on a car without any soundproofing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErikElvis Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Have you changed your tires? Most road noise usually comes from worn or poor quality tires. just put michelins on. helped but still noisy. The 2015 is a drastic improvement here, especially the 6-speed model. (The CVT is noisy as all hell, as CVTs are) That's true in most cars, but the Fit is notorious for being noisy, because a low bottom line leaves little room for sound deadening. Quiet tires will help, but they'll only go so far on a car without any soundproofing. I would like the leather. the fabric in mine is the stuff that grabs hair and won't let go. pain if you have dogs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 I'd dig leather, but it only comes on the EX-L, which only comes with that nasty CVT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 23, 2015 Author Share Posted April 23, 2015 Are Hondas skimping on sound deadening? I currently drive a tiny Kia hatchback, but I feel Kia has overengineered it, as you can barely hear any road noise on the highways and the interior trim is borderline Audi, save for the hard plastics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Are Hondas skimping on sound deadening? I currently drive a tiny Kia hatchback, but I feel Kia has overengineered it, as you can barely hear any road noise on the highways and the interior trim is borderline Audi, save for the hard plastics. It's a $15,000 subcompact with a curb weight approaching 2600lbs. On top of that low, low price, it has a standard backup camera, a brand new engine, transmission, and platform, best-in-class interior space and materials quality, and not-trash ride and handling. Instead of spending money on a silent cabin, they put a nicer radio in. And given my experience with Kias, they still just don't have all the little details of economy cars sorted like Honda does. Kias still feel tinny and they don't have good seats or ergonomics. Honda has decades of practice to stand on, and it shows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 23, 2015 Author Share Posted April 23, 2015 It's a $15,000 subcompact with a curb weight approaching 2600lbs. On top of that low, low price, it has a standard backup camera, a brand new engine, transmission, and platform, best-in-class interior space and materials quality, and not-trash ride and handling. Instead of spending money on a silent cabin, they put a nicer radio in. And given my experience with Kias, they still just don't have all the little details of economy cars sorted like Honda does. Kias still feel tinny and they don't have good seats or ergonomics. Honda has decades of practice to stand on, and it shows. In Southeast Asia, it's a different story. Since majority of the Japanese brands are made in Thailand, India, or Indonesia, the quality is lagging a bit compared to the same models that are made in Japan (if available). On the other hand, Hyundai and Kia cars feel more upscale at the same price range as their Japanese competitors. They benefit heavily from improved design and ergonomics after hiring former BMW and Audi designers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 23, 2015 Author Share Posted April 23, 2015 This looks fun to drive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErikElvis Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Are Hondas skimping on sound deadening? I currently drive a tiny Kia hatchback, but I feel Kia has overengineered it, as you can barely hear any road noise on the highways and the interior trim is borderline Audi, save for the hard plastics. Ive heard the new civic is a little noisy. The Fit is just a very simple car that you'll prob have no prob driving 250,000 miles. thats what i like about it. It reminds me of my 97 civic. the civic was more comfortable though. I feel that in Hondas your paying for engineering where it counts. in the drivetrain. It's a $15,000 subcompact with a curb weight approaching 2600lbs. On top of that low, low price, it has a standard backup camera, a brand new engine, transmission, and platform, best-in-class interior space and materials quality, and not-trash ride and handling. Instead of spending money on a silent cabin, they put a nicer radio in. And given my experience with Kias, they still just don't have all the little details of economy cars sorted like Honda does. Kias still feel tinny and they don't have good seats or ergonomics. Honda has decades of practice to stand on, and it shows. Thats funny. I always though my Fits radio was pretty good for a economy car and it makes sense. I would like a new fit but my next dd will prob be something awd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 The Fit today is what the Civic was 10 years ago, and that's a very good place to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 Mazda released pricing for the new Miata. http://wot.motortrend.com/1503_2016_mazda_miata_starts_at_25735.html Honestly, for the same amount of money I'd grab a BRZ instead and take the additional 45HP. I'll wait till we finally see a Mazdaspeed Miata to see where they can push this car. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizman Posted April 23, 2015 Share Posted April 23, 2015 I think its priced just about right to compete with the FR-S/BRZ in the US. BRZ weighs 2600 and ND Miata is 2300 so I would guess they would be about same 0-60. I'd definitely wait for a mazdaspeed or see what the abarth version will turn out to be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 That price sounds about right, based on the current Miata. But if you think the Miata needs more power, you're missing the point. All the same, if you think that extra 45hp makes the FRBZRSTQG869 Celica qualify as "not underpowered" you're incorrect. The Miata is so small and tossable, that low power figure fits it perfectly. It's not a fast car, it's a fun car. The Subuyota Celica isn't nearly as quick as it should be to make up for how not-fast it is. Noisy, too, with a cheap feel that you don't get in the Miata. If you have $25,000-$30,000 to spend on a new sport coupe, your options are basically Miata and Mustang Ecoboost. There isn't really any reason to buy the Scion Failed to Reach Success or Subaru Buy a Real Z, considering how poorly they stack up against either end of the spectrum, and how poorly-rounded they are. That car came totally unprepared for what Ford was about to bring, and I don't think anyone expected the Miata's weight to come down. Not to mention its base price is the highest of the bunch, without offering the best handling or power potential in the class, and frankly having the worst interior. (Which is a shocker when the competition is an American carmaker and its discarded Japanese economy car holding) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 24, 2015 Author Share Posted April 24, 2015 Vin Diesel Confirms Fast & Furious 8, Get the Details Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizman Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 That price sounds about right, based on the current Miata. But if you think the Miata needs more power, you're missing the point. All the same, if you think that extra 45hp makes the FRBZRSTQG869 Celica qualify as "not underpowered" you're incorrect. The Miata is so small and tossable, that low power figure fits it perfectly. It's not a fast car, it's a fun car. The Subuyota Celica isn't nearly as quick as it should be to make up for how not-fast it is. Noisy, too, with a cheap feel that you don't get in the Miata. If you have $25,000-$30,000 to spend on a new sport coupe, your options are basically Miata and Mustang Ecoboost. There isn't really any reason to buy the Scion Failed to Reach Success or Subaru Buy a Real Z, considering how poorly they stack up against either end of the spectrum, and how poorly-rounded they are. That car came totally unprepared for what Ford was about to bring, and I don't think anyone expected the Miata's weight to come down. Not to mention its base price is the highest of the bunch, without offering the best handling or power potential in the class, and frankly having the worst interior. (Which is a shocker when the competition is an American carmaker and its discarded Japanese economy car holding) You should get those BRZ/FR-S anger issues checked out, that's just not healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 24, 2015 Share Posted April 24, 2015 I spent 3 years getting myself hyped up for the car between when they announced it and when the disappointment of a decade was launched. And then I drove it. It's a car that would fit in 10 years before it came out, but god what a failure to meet any reasonable standard of a modern car. The car's sales have proven its total lack of mass appeal since the initial boom, after which all the people who wanted one already had one, and nobody else would be caught dead in such a miserable excuse for a modern car. This is the nightmarish half-aborted spawn of a passionate lunatic CEO and the most incompetent marketing bureaucrats in the world, not the awesome results of Toyota and Subaru making the best sports coupe ever through combined engineering know-how. All the power of a Toyota, all the fuel economy of a Subie, all the quality of a Scion, and all the "fun" is the fact that its Prius tires couldn't grip the inside of a bottle of rubber cement, so they can hide its lame performance behind its ability to break its made-of-ice tires loose, because drifting bro. Chrissakes, my stock 25 year old 240SX is faster and funner. Hell, it even has a usable backseat and its materials quality and ergonomics don't evoke Yaris. How is it this NEW TOYOTA can't beat a GENERATION OLD NISSAN? Oh how the Japanese have fallen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted April 25, 2015 Share Posted April 25, 2015 Here's another look at the Singer Porsche 911. Part of me thinks: yeh, those Singers are so cool, combining modern materials & upgrades with those classic lines. But in hindsight, it's still a Porsche. Those are some absolutely ridiculous prices to pay for a car that, at some point, will actively try to kill you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
areaseven Posted April 26, 2015 Author Share Posted April 26, 2015 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 I saw that video the other day and it made me realize: I don't love my 200SX anymore. Nissan just did not give any effort when they made that '80s econosport. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anime52k8 Posted April 26, 2015 Share Posted April 26, 2015 It's still kind of depressing that they don't sell the third gen Scirocco over here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Posted May 7, 2015 Share Posted May 7, 2015 Just have to share this one. Been hoping to see him do an NSX for awhile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted May 8, 2015 Share Posted May 8, 2015 Regular Car Reviews has been less and less about dick jokes and more and more about (this guy was obviously an) English Major prosaic pretentious nonsense interspersed between bouts of circlejerking over vaguely special cars lately, and it's a direction I'm not digging. And while I'm ranting, am I the only one frustrated by Mr Regular's simultaneous desire to become a heavy hitter YouTube car show guy AND remain anonymous? How noncommittal can you get? And why don't we ever hear from the Roman except for those stupid musical bits at the beginning and end of the video? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dizman Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I like how Mr. Regular loves certain cars, just makes him a "regular car guy" like the rest of us. When he was talking about the 360 Modena he treated it like a regular car and rambled on but talking about a MR2 you could feel his love for that car. Eventually he will have to show his face but I can't really blame him for staying anonymous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted May 9, 2015 Share Posted May 9, 2015 I just think it's the most noncommittal thing in the world. It's disingenuous to say "we're not heavy-hitters... yet" but also say "I want to remain anonymous". If you wanna be like Marty and Moog, or Matt Farah, or Mike Spinelli, or whoever, you have to come to terms with the fact that fame needs a face. And if you wanna be faceless, then shut up and apply to Jalopnik. I'm sure they'd hire you outright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reddsun1 Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Dafu*k is that? Turd brown? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 The worst part is, it's also satin. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenius Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 A few years ago it was said that brown was going to go extinct as a car color... it has since rebounded significantly. Wouldn't be my choice for a high visibility sports car though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ErikElvis Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 My dad has a convertible metallic brown Audi. It looks awesome. I also have a metallic brown Harley. Well light root beer and dark root beer. I love it. But that lambo is bleh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchizophrenicMC Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 Satin as the primary finish on a car is lame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenius Posted May 12, 2015 Share Posted May 12, 2015 I dunno, I saw a satin black Lamborghini at Stanford last summer and it looked amazing. A guy parked his black R8 next to it and circled the Lamborghini several times before grabbing his clubs... which got me wondering if you could fit golf clubs in the Lamborghini. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.