jenius Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Wow, all three of the DYRL VF-1A toys huh? They should sell them as a gift set (yes I know that would never happen). Quote
Vi-RS Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Bandai Bandai Bandai.... I waited 20 years for a new VF-1 toy line, apparently they are late in the game. Those launching arms are not included I assume. Quote
eriku Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Glad to see more releases, but I'm waiting patiently for variants that are more exciting to me like a TV 1A Max, 1D, Ostrich, Elint, etc. Quote
MR_Hyde Posted October 1, 2010 Posted October 1, 2010 Glad to see more releases, but I'm waiting patiently for variants that are more exciting to me like a TV 1A Max, 1D, Ostrich, Elint, etc. I agree, especially the 1A max and 1D. I'm waiting for the TV 1A Mass Prod as well as the VF-11 and a low-vis 1S. Quote
mickyg Posted October 2, 2010 Posted October 2, 2010 That setup with the launch arms and hanger is very cool! It looks as though it's good enough for release. Anyone know the likelyhood of that happening? Quote
Black Valkyrie Posted October 2, 2010 Author Posted October 2, 2010 (edited) Hmm... Web exclusive ?! Edited October 2, 2010 by Black Valkyrie Quote
Guest sh002 Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 is vf-1j millia gonna be an exclusive as well if it is released? Quote
MR_Hyde Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 Question- (please consider this a mid-term report card for the VF 100 line) How's everyone's VF holding up? Increased floppiness? Cracked joints? Basically- I love my 1/60 V.2's but my shelf space is now at a premium. I do transform my Valk's and I have been lucky that I haven't had too many issues. I'm wondering how folks' 100's are holding up to use. Quote
Tking22 Posted October 3, 2010 Posted October 3, 2010 No problems what so ever, the only thing I'm wondering is if Bandai will release stand alone fast packs for our Hikaru 1J's as it seems most of the new releases may just come with them. Quote
eriku Posted October 4, 2010 Posted October 4, 2010 Mine is still just like it was out of the box - tight joints, no cracking or stressing. This is probable the most-posed valk toy I've ever had, too. I'd love to get a GBP for it... Quote
MR_Hyde Posted October 5, 2010 Posted October 5, 2010 Thanks for the input, Tking22 and eriku. I just ordered my first from Angolz, and as soon as the others pop up I'll likely be ordering them as well. I read your review eriku and it definitely helped to influence my decision- thanks. Quote
knoted Posted October 10, 2010 Posted October 10, 2010 How tall does this one stand in battroid mode ? 6 inch ? Quote
Guest sh002 Posted October 10, 2010 Posted October 10, 2010 Comparison pic between HiMetal 1/100 and Yamato 1/60 v2. Note: the "neck ugliness" of my 1/60 is mitigated by leaving the chest plate slightly up whoa i like the look of the 1/100 bandai more than the 1/60 yamato Quote
Tking22 Posted October 10, 2010 Posted October 10, 2010 whoa i like the look of the 1/100 bandai more than the 1/60 yamato Seconded, I think these hi-metals have the best looking battroid mode of any macross toy available, the other modes are pretty epic as well. Quote
eugimon Posted October 10, 2010 Posted October 10, 2010 Yeah, I like the hi-metal better than a mistransformed 1/60 shot from a wonky angle too. Quote
nexxstrait Posted October 10, 2010 Posted October 10, 2010 Yeah, I like the hi-metal better than a mistransformed 1/60 shot from a wonky angle too. Now you made me curious, how is it "mistransformed"? Quote
eugimon Posted October 10, 2010 Posted October 10, 2010 Now you made me curious, how is it "mistransformed"? when you push the chest plate up so high it takes away one of the things the 1/60 does do correctly over the hi-metal, the chest/heatshield/intake proportions. It makes the 1/60 look like it has the long waist/small chest like the hi-metal when it doesn't. And when you take the photo from such a low angle that the little shoulder lamps and tail fins aren't visible you aren't doing it any favors either. Not saying the hi-metal looks bad. I think it's astonishing how good it looks given how small it is, but it also has a boat load of compromises compared to the line art as does the 1/60 Quote
nexxstrait Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 when you push the chest plate up so high it takes away one of the things the 1/60 does do correctly over the hi-metal, the chest/heatshield/intake proportions. It makes the 1/60 look like it has the long waist/small chest like the hi-metal when it doesn't. Fried air. I hope you are aware that the chest piece in the picture is maybe less than 1 mm higher than it should, right? You like 1/60 better? Fine. Quote
eugimon Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Fried air. I hope you are aware that the chest piece in the picture is maybe less than 1 mm higher than it should, right? You like 1/60 better? Fine. Yeah, i know, but coupled with the fact that you took that comparison shot from something like a 30 degree angle which completely distorts the proportions it's not a fair or even remotely accurate comparison. You like the hi metal, good for you, but if you're going to do a comparison shot you should at least try to be honest about it and not distort one to try and make the other better. Sorry if that's too much to ask. As it stands, I was accurate in my assessment, the 1/60 is mistransformed and the comparison shot is at an angle that distorts proportions. That has nothing to do with what I "like" but rather what is accurate and fair. Quote
nexxstrait Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 Yeah, i know, but coupled with the fact that you took that comparison shot from something like a 30 degree angle which completely distorts the proportions it's not a fair or even remotely accurate comparison. You like the hi metal, good for you, but if you're going to do a comparison shot you should at least try to be honest about it and not distort one to try and make the other better. Sorry if that's too much to ask. As it stands, I was accurate in my assessment, the 1/60 is mistransformed and the comparison shot is at an angle that distorts proportions. That has nothing to do with what I "like" but rather what is accurate and fair. I don't know why you try to defend the 1/60 so hard, since it seems perfectly good in my picture. It even has correctly positioned shoulders man! Anyway, send an "accurate photo" and I'll be glad to post it along with the 1/100 for a "fair" comparison and... never mind, whatever. Quote
eugimon Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 I don't know why you try to defend the 1/60 so hard, since it seems perfectly good in my picture. It even has correctly positioned shoulders man! Anyway, send an "accurate photo" and I'll be glad to post it along with the 1/100 for a "fair" comparison and... never mind, whatever. Whatever is right, if you don't know the basics of perspective it certainly isn't up to me to teach it to you. Your comparison shot is wonky and I called you on it. You can try to spin this any way you want but All I can is I've wasted more than enough time on you. Quote
Black Valkyrie Posted October 11, 2010 Author Posted October 11, 2010 WTH ?! almost the size and cheaper. Quote
anime52k8 Posted October 11, 2010 Posted October 11, 2010 WTH ?! almost the size and cheaper. I think there are some words missing from this statement. Quote
Graham Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 Despite the issues I have with the Hi-Metal VF-1J (glued on intake and stupid angle of the gunpod in fighter mode), I will probably pick up 1 of the DYRL Valks. Still hoping for news of the VF-19F soon, as that is an easy one for Bandai to do. It better come with a fighter mode gunpod attachment this time thouhgh! And yes, I'd love to see Bandai's take on the VF-0S/D/A in Hi-Metal form. Probably won't happen though. :-( Graham Quote
David Hingtgen Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 Do just the 0D. I think Bandai would have more success doing "the valks you can't get otherwise" rather than "yet more valks you already own in 1/55, 1/48, 1/60, and 1/72..." (exceptions for stuff like the -19S of course, where they have greatly improved upon previous offerings) Quote
Graham Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 Hi Metal VF-171 & VF-171EX, I'd buy a squadron of each if done well. Graham Quote
Tking22 Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 Do just the 0D. I think Bandai would have more success doing "the valks you can't get otherwise" rather than "yet more valks you already own in 1/55, 1/48, 1/60, and 1/72..." (exceptions for stuff like the -19S of course, where they have greatly improved upon previous offerings) Agreed, instead of releasing the same valks most people own three times over in different scales and colors give us the valks yamato won't touch, the 0D would be a good start, a VF-4 would be AWESOME. Why do just valks, hi-metal destroids in scale with the valks, hell a hi-metal monster, that would way too effin awesome, then I'd buy a LOT more toynami regults and battle scene it up. Quote
Renato Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 I get the feeling Bandai stays away from those designs because they figure "Well, if they ain't good enough for Yamato, we ain't doin' them either!" Basically, they seem to use Yamato as market research. If Yamato deemed something unprofitable (e.g. VF-0D), then it follows logically that Bandai would want to steer clear and stay with the guaranteed bestsellers (HOW many times has the VF-1S Focker been re-released by Yamato now?). Bandai is welcome to prove me wrong, though, I invite them to. I'd definitely like a small VF-0D. Quote
eriku Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 I think the fact that Bandai did the VF-19 before Yamato negates your theory. Quote
kanedaestes Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 Don't know about that one, Yamato never could produce Mac 7 toys until recently, and Mac 7 was a big hit for Bandai so it makes sense that they released that valk before Yamato. Quote
Funkenstein Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 Agreed, instead of releasing the same valks most people own three times over in different scales and colors give us the valks yamato won't touch, the 0D would be a good start, a VF-4 would be AWESOME. Why do just valks, hi-metal destroids in scale with the valks, hell a hi-metal monster, that would way too effin awesome, then I'd buy a LOT more toynami regults and battle scene it up. The Chogokin DX Koenig Monster probably qualifies as 1/100 scale, so that is already done. Quote
lechuck Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 I get the feeling Bandai stays away from those designs because they figure "Well, if they ain't good enough for Yamato, we ain't doin' them either!" Basically, they seem to use Yamato as market research. If Yamato deemed something unprofitable (e.g. VF-0D), then it follows logically that Bandai would want to steer clear and stay with the guaranteed bestsellers (HOW many times has the VF-1S Focker been re-released by Yamato now?). Bandai is welcome to prove me wrong, though, I invite them to. I'd definitely like a small VF-0D. Err right... Bandai didn't announce VF-19 kai before Yamato and then went on to produce the fan requested VF-19S. The toy world does not only revolve around Yamato's "creatve geniuses"... Quote
jenius Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 1) DX Koenig is probably more like 1/120 scale than 1/100 and that's why it's not part of the Hi-Metal line but rather the Robot Spirits line 2) It's very silly to say "This company should make all the toys that aren't proven money makers since we already own the toys that are." If they're proven money-makers they're going to get made first. 3) Yamato and Bandai pull from the same statistics on toy sales and probably very similar market research to decide what gets made. If Bandai makes all the same toys as Yamato it's because that's what the market indicates people will buy, not because Bandai is copying Yamato. Quote
Tking22 Posted October 12, 2010 Posted October 12, 2010 The Chogokin DX Koenig Monster probably qualifies as 1/100 scale, so that is already done. I want an original Macross monster, the Koenig is really ugly to me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.