bluemax151 Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 (edited) Christ, I second that. Next to Kevin, she's the second most annoying person on Attack of the Show. I don't blame her for her performance on AOTS because I assume they make her do that. Try listening to her Lovelive appearances. My god she was more apt to go off on a tangent than Adam Carolla and about twice as annoying without as much of the funny. She did have a tendency to spam lewd comments like "chili dog" which was kind of refreshing coming from the female co host though Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't kick her out of bed for eating cookies but I have my doubts about her ability to deliver lines of dialogue. Edited December 10, 2009 by bluemax151 Quote
azrael Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Still waitin on the War Machine poster. Quote
EXO Posted December 10, 2009 Author Posted December 10, 2009 don't know what whiplash looks like in the books but not into that character design. Quote
CoryHolmes Posted December 10, 2009 Posted December 10, 2009 Same here. Based on what I've seen so far, Whiplash will be the moments that I want most to fast-forward through. Just like Jar-Jar in Star Wars, Sam's mother in Transformers, etc. Quote
Wanzerfan Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 don't know what whiplash looks like in the books but not into that character design. Here is a link to a pic of Whiplash in all of his personas. Quote
bluemax151 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 (edited) Mickey Rourke as Whiplash looks like some kind of BDSM gladiator (kind of like Juggernaut in X-Men The Last Stand). Edited July 13, 2020 by bluemax151 Quote
bluemax151 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Nah, Ben Affleck as Daredevil just looks like a gimp. Quote
EXO Posted December 11, 2009 Author Posted December 11, 2009 Nah, Ben Affleck as Daredevil just looks like a gimp. Rhetorical OT question... but you DO understand what BDSM stands for right? Mickey Rourke was so awesome in the 80s... he too too many punches in the head... but you can't really use the too many drugs argument here... he is acting opposite RDJr.... Quote
bluemax151 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Mickey Rourke's face is bad mostly because of failed/bad plastic surgery not from the other stuff. Not that any of that other stuff helped I'm sure. Even though you said rhetorical... a gimp is submissive. BDSM does not innately imply submissiveness but play of both. Quote
eugimon Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 Mickey Rourke's face is bad mostly because of failed/bad plastic surgery not from the other stuff. Not that any of that other stuff helped I'm sure. Even though you said rhetorical... a gimp is submissive. BDSM does not innately imply submissiveness but play of both. Yup, his face got pretty mangled during his boxing run in the 90's, he busted up his nose and cheekbone pretty badly and that led to the plastic surgery which he admits was botched. Quote
promethuem5 Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 I'm diggin the Whiplash design... I think it will be cool how they merge the Whiplash character with the Rooskies stuff (if the stuff I've read is to be believed) in-place of a Crimson Dynamo, whom would be awfully anachronistic when compared to the first movie. We've seen later Whiplash incarnations with a more tech-ed up and black leather vibe (like what he was wearing when the Sentient Armor first awoke and killed him). Whiplash was always a total goon and a bruiser and casting someone as gross as Mickey Rourke really plays that up. That said, alot of how well he works in the film will be dependent on how he moves and fights. Fortunately the first movie showed us that Favreau and this special effects team knows how to handle the mechanical interactions and fight choreography with flying colors. Quote
David Hingtgen Posted December 11, 2009 Posted December 11, 2009 OT, but Prometheum used the same Santa Hat for his avatar that I did... Quote
EXO Posted December 12, 2009 Author Posted December 12, 2009 OT, but Prometheum used the same Santa Hat for his avatar that I did... So lame... Quote
David Hingtgen Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Your avatar is real---you need a real hat added for it to look right. My avatar is animated, thus a toon-style hat. Your avatar has mis-matched realism now. Quote
promethuem5 Posted December 12, 2009 Posted December 12, 2009 Haha, I noticed that right away too... I always just google 'Santa Hat' and use the same one... Quote
Wanzerfan Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 Mickey Rourke as Whiplash looks like some kind of gay BDSM gladiator (kind of like Juggernaut in X-Men The Last Stand). I heard that movie was a train wreck that true X-Men fans despised. (I saw the first two movies; the first one was pretty good, but they totally screwed up Kurt Wagner in the second one). Quote
Robelwell202 Posted December 13, 2009 Posted December 13, 2009 I heard that movie was a train wreck that true X-Men fans despised. (I saw the first two movies; the first one was pretty good, but they totally screwed up Kurt Wagner in the second one). Oh, it was... A painful train wreck at that. My only hope is, that when I get the chance to see the new Wolverine flick, it's at least a bit better. X3 was truly HORRIBLE!!! Quote
Gunbuster Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Trailer is out http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/ironman/ War Machine looks freaking awesome at the end of the trailer :-) Quote
Vepariga Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Oh, it was... A painful train wreck at that. My only hope is, that when I get the chance to see the new Wolverine flick, it's at least a bit better. X3 was truly HORRIBLE!!! Wolverine was even worse then X3, I didnt think it would be possible but they did it! on topic, That Ironman 2 trailer is awesome! WarMachine will look great on the big screen and big sound. Quote
CoryHolmes Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Based on that trailer, I can already tell there are quite a few places where my remote-finger will be itching for the fast-forward button. That being said, watching Iron Man and War Machine blast the crap outta robot mooks is going to pure awesomeness Quote
promethuem5 Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 The new trailer left me speechless last night. Truly, this will be the best movie ever made (Until 3). Quote
DarrinG Posted December 17, 2009 Posted December 17, 2009 Looks awesome! Not sure we need multiple new characters at once. Makes it more believable to me to keep it to one new freak per movie - but hey - I'm going opening day . . . Quote
BeyondTheGrave Posted December 20, 2009 Posted December 20, 2009 I heard that movie was a train wreck that true X-Men fans despised. (I saw the first two movies; the first one was pretty good, but they totally screwed up Kurt Wagner in the second one). X2 was good. X3 was ok there were things that could have been better but oh well. If the true x-men fans had their way the Phoenix saga would be six movies alone. Oh, it was... A painful train wreck at that. My only hope is, that when I get the chance to see the new Wolverine flick, it's at least a bit better. X3 was truly HORRIBLE!!! Go read the wiki entry and save your self sometime. The main issue is that Hugh Jackman had too much control over what was done. My question is did stark build war machine in the movie or did justin hammer? Quote
azrael Posted December 20, 2009 Posted December 20, 2009 My question is did stark build war machine in the movie or did justin hammer? From what I've seen in the Comic-con footage and guessing Tony hands over the Mk II suit and Hammer modifies it according to military specs. But that's guessing. I'm not sure where they got the mini reactor. Quote
BeyondTheGrave Posted December 20, 2009 Posted December 20, 2009 From what I've seen in the Comic-con footage and guessing Tony hands over the Mk II suit and Hammer modifies it according to military specs. But that's guessing. I'm not sure where they got the mini reactor. it could also be that various suits were stolen and or reverse engineered. It'd be cool if they were setting the movie(s) up to do armor wars. Quote
CoryHolmes Posted December 20, 2009 Posted December 20, 2009 From what I've seen in the Comic-con footage and guessing Tony hands over the Mk II suit and Hammer modifies it according to military specs. But that's guessing. I'm not sure where they got the mini reactor. My theory is that Whiplash sold the plans for his recreated reactor to anyone with money. Add to that with the Iron Monger blueprints undoubtaly on file somewhere... Quote
BeyondTheGrave Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 I know its a serious bump in all. So here's the newest trailer for Iron man 2 It should be safe for work Quote
Agent ONE Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 Cheadle > Howard. Howard got a Crispin Glover syndrome probably. Pity, just when I got used to the idea of him as War Machine. Hell though, they really could have gotten anybody and in the back of my mind I half expected a change of actor for one reason or another. I would have predicted notoriety as the deciding issue though... like Denzel Washington or Wesley Snipes sniping the role. If we can just swap in ANY black guy (which seems to be the case) how about Eddie Murphy? Quote
eugimon Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 Love the suit case suit, all kinds of awesome in a compact and portable sort of way Quote
Gaijin Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 Looks pretty good. Want to see what role Munn plays... Quote
Max Jenius Posted March 10, 2010 Posted March 10, 2010 No Mandarin = not a good iron man movie. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.