areaseven Posted June 26, 2006 Author Posted June 26, 2006 (edited) Serena Varghese (Kim in Area 88) (Sorry, not worth posting pics.) Edited June 26, 2006 by areaseven
kensei Posted June 26, 2006 Posted June 26, 2006 (edited) What? She's alright. EDIT: WOAH She IS alright. Edited June 26, 2006 by kensei
chrono Posted June 26, 2006 Posted June 26, 2006 What? She's alright.EDIT: WOAH She IS alright. 411434[/snapback] After you unglue your eyes from her lungs... She'd be all right on a desserted island, but......
Fatalist Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 Sadly, I think all the negative feedback from all of you is due to being too intimidated by their beauty. Granted Graham is correct in saying "one persons 10 is anothers 3.5". But there is seriously NOTHING wrong with these women. All are beautiful in their own right. I personally have yet to find one thats not attractive. Someday when you all grow up, you'll understand.
Roy Focker Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 All are beautiful in their own right. I personally have yet to find one thats not attractive. They are beautiful? Then there must be some real dogs where you live. As said nothing is (seriously) wrong with them. Most of them posted so far are average looking. Good photographer, make up and hair artist and the right clothes could make them look good for this pictures. Instead they end up looking like Glamor shots mall whores. It is just the wrong look for them.
Jolly Rogers Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 This thread is like a trainwreck... everyone knows it's terrible but can't help looking at it.
Fatalist Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 All are beautiful in their own right. I personally have yet to find one thats not attractive. They are beautiful? Then there must be some real dogs where you live. As said nothing is (seriously) wrong with them. Most of them posted so far are average looking. Good photographer, make up and hair artist and the right clothes could make them look good for this pictures. Instead they end up looking like Glamor shots mall whores. It is just the wrong look for them. 415570[/snapback] At last glance, San Diego does have its dogs, but its also a California beach town. My point is this: Stick to nitpicking "leg gaps" in toys and how the lineart doesnt match up with CAD drawings. Don't nitpick the looks of women. Its just not a healthy attitude to have, especially in this "hobby field".
Mr March Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 This thread is like a trainwreck... everyone knows it's terrible but can't help looking at it. 415571[/snapback] Well said.
yellowlightman Posted July 12, 2006 Posted July 12, 2006 They are beautiful? Then there must be some real dogs where you live. 415570[/snapback] Post some pictures of all the hot women you've hooked up with. I bet their a LOT better looking than these uglies.
Roy Focker Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 I could and also I know of a few 50 year dames that are better looking. Of course they they had their hair and make up done by the same people they would look like (old) whores too.
Mowe Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 (edited) Sadly, I think all the negative feedback from all of you is due to being too intimidated by their beauty....there is seriously NOTHING wrong with these women. All are beautiful in their own right. I personally have yet to find one thats not attractive. Someday when you all grow up, you'll understand. 415539[/snapback] Concurre. To those self-indulgent critics with self proclaimed cultivated knowledge of female beauty, whom have called these fine looking ladies a whore, I sincerely hope your woman are better looking than they are….if not, well…that means you have bagged home something less than a … Edited July 13, 2006 by Mowe
yellowlightman Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 I could 415645[/snapback] So why don't you? Backup all this talk about what a stud you are and your high standards of the opposite sex. Do you tell them you're a moderator on an internet forum devoted to a 25 year old cartoon before or after you ask for a girls number?
Fatalist Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 I could 415645[/snapback] So why don't you? Backup all this talk about what a stud you are and your high standards of the opposite sex. Do you tell them you're a moderator on an internet forum devoted to a 25 year old cartoon before or after you ask for a girls number? 415722[/snapback] Well said!! Bravo!
Roy Focker Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 What you are failing to understand is I haven't called them ugly (other than in jest). What I have been saying if some of you can get through your heads, is that these are average lookings chicks. Who could be even more attractive looking with the right window treatments. Instead they have done up like whores. Their hair and make up matches the old Glamor shot commerical and 1-900 phone Sex commericals. This isn't saying they are ugly whores. Actually with these pictures they look like high class ones. What do you guys just go for the high class whore look? Honestly if one your girlfriends went to your highschool reunion or company xmas party you don't thinks other in attendence would think your new girl friend is some kind of a slurm? "But the slurmty look is hot!" Maybe but it doesn't change the fact that it is a slurmty/High Price Whore look. Take a look at all of Area Seven's avatars. If I'm not mistaken nearly all of them have porn stars or centerfolds. Notice that these ADV chicks have similar hair and make up jobs? What is so hard too get about this? Average Girls Made up in slurmty way thus end up looking like slurms. I bet they have head shots that were made before these pictures that gives them an entirely different less whorish look.
fulcy Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 Sadly, I think all the negative feedback from all of you is due to being too intimidated by their beauty. Granted Graham is correct in saying "one persons 10 is anothers 3.5". But there is seriously NOTHING wrong with these women. All are beautiful in their own right. I personally have yet to find one thats not attractive. But you just stated - 'I personally have yet to find' so that's your opinion - and not everyone will share that opinion. Personally, I kinda side with Roy on this one - some of them are cute, but others just don't do anything for me, and I don't find them beautiful at all...
Twoducks Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 (edited) Sadly, I think all the negative feedback from all of you is due to being too intimidated by their beauty....there is seriously NOTHING wrong with these women. All are beautiful in their own right. I personally have yet to find one thats not attractive. Someday when you all grow up, you'll understand. 415539[/snapback] Concurre. To those self-indulgent critics with self proclaimed cultivated knowledge of female beauty, whom have called these fine looking ladies a whore, I sincerely hope your woman are better looking than they are….if not, well…that means you have bagged home something less than a … 415692[/snapback] Nicely put. But we all know that those fine gentlemen, that are so handsome and respectful that they can label certain styles “whore stylesâ€, would have gone bananas had they seen these girls (or even their own mothers) wearing a Slave Leia or Minmei outfit. Edited July 14, 2006 by Twoducks
kensei Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Some of those chicks that cosplay slave Leia are just wrong. Nowhere in the same league as these women.
Fatalist Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Some of those chicks that cosplay slave Leia are just wrong. Nowhere in the same league as these women. 416021[/snapback] Here here! I've seen such sights in person. SDCC anyone? They should have stuck with the Emperors Royal Guard, to hide "all that".
areaseven Posted July 14, 2006 Author Posted July 14, 2006 (edited) Shelley Calene-Black (Mireille in NOIR) Edited July 15, 2006 by areaseven
VF Strike Valk Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 (edited) LOL! Lighten up guys. Edited July 14, 2006 by VF Strike Valk
Roy Focker Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 If you doubt that haven't been "whored out" Just look at the current one. Some S&M Chains: Check. Animal Prints: Check.
Jolly Rogers Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I think this thread has overstayed its welcome a few pages ago. Close it already FFS.
Godzilla Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Shelley Calene-Black (Mireille in NOIR) 416097[/snapback] Now she isnt bad at all. She is definitely pretty by far on this thread.
Nightbat Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 Boy, she's been hit with the the ugly stick pretty badly huh?
Mowe Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 (edited) OK, time to recap: The ADV chicks have been called by our fine MW studs as the following: Trannies -> porn stars -> whores -> poor man's ho -> real dogs -> average looking whores -> slu_t -> high class whore Well, at least they are moving up the rank from trannies to high class whore . Summary: Fine looking ADV women with glamour make ups are called whore; Back paddling MW studs with no manners should be called pigs. Edited July 15, 2006 by Mowe
EXO Posted July 15, 2006 Posted July 15, 2006 Well since the pics are all coming from the same place and there's only one person posting them then it's not really a thread that serves the community. Besides, it's seems to me that some people here are more interested in a few good men rather than babes... So if you guys believe you can get girls hotter than these then I'll let Jack tell you in his own words: YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!
Recommended Posts