Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Re-posted from my own posts on Toybox DX.com. Enjoy! :D

pictures, mostly of Scopedog, revolver joint figures and also some escaflowne trading figures,

http://www.toysdaily.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=33552

one very poor pictures of Yamatos Garland & Shogo, Takaras Great Exkaiser & some random woman,

http://www.toysdaily.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=33558

SOC's,

http://www.toysdaily.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=33557

massive gallery, incuding batshit crazy SHE's latest work & cosplay girls among dozens of other things,

http://toycan.net/g/r/750/

a static MZ23 figure from Max Fcatory (can't remember the name)

http://www.toysdaily.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=33509

still more from max fcatory,

http://angelsrep.plala.jp/~fumiyuki/figure.../2006wfw02.html

Stop the presses and check this out, Tachikoma with opening cockpit and in scale fully articulated Motoko figure,

DCTACHI.jpg

Is it the Good Smile companys now mythical product or someone elses product?

More must be known!

edit: and so it was found!

DCTACHI2.jpg

edit: Due in December, for 17'800yen, I'd better get saving!

clearer picture, http://cgi.2chan.net/y/src/1140372268134.jpg

a different angle,

http://cgi.2chan.net/y/src/1140371925937.jpg

Big album of very clear pictures of Kaiyodos new revolver joint figure line, good looking figures from a random selection of subjetcs.

http://photobucket.com/albums/v51/Fortmax/revoltech/

Edited by Fort Max
Posted

Last Friday I was told that Yamato would have the Stealth and Low Vis 2 on display at Wonder Fest as well as the recolor Macross stands and the VF-0S.

I don't know if something changed between Friday and Sunday though.

SaveRobotech was supposed to be going and taking pics. He hasn't posted in this thread yet. Hopefully he got some pics. but just hasn't had time to post them yet though.

Graham

Posted
If they weren't shown, or if nobody took pics, I'll see if I can at least get permission to describe them :)

Graham

371731[/snapback]

<--- crossing fingers

Posted
Not sure if you've seen these.  I give them the thumbs down, personally.

Thanks to zipa.

371767[/snapback]

WHOA! So these are the new Low Viz and Stealth variants. :blink:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Not really my cup of tea.

Posted (edited)
Not sure if you've seen these.  I give them the thumbs down, personally.

Thanks to zipa.

371767[/snapback]

WHOA! So these are the new Low Viz and Stealth variants. :blink:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Not really my cup of tea.

371769[/snapback]

No kidding some one must have dipping in the sauce when they thought of these.

they look like bootleg yammies

Edited by buddhafabio
Posted (edited)

So they're going to release a shiny metal version of the launch arm eh?

Well I think the camo version looks like an easy custom someone made of a cannon fodder... which I guess is exactly what it is. Does the writing indicate that these will be Limited Versions?

The stealth looks unfinished. What's up with those strike parts? Is this going to be the first valk that actually comes with strike parts?? Why do the strike cannon and missile tower look completely flat gray?

No GBP shown. Does that mean the next GBP offering is just a reissue?

WHY NO TV Max 1A?? They're going to put out these wierd one-offs and avoid official schemes? LAME. I would rather have had an Alaska Base green valk over the camo one :(

Yeah, I'm buying them both, but they won't be getting much love in my display cases.

Edited by jenius
Posted

You can see that the jungle camo valk has a CF as the base.

That VF-1J isn't so bad though, but why am I not so excited about it?

Posted

The stealth isn't so bad... not sure what else people were expecting. I think it's better than all black, but it would have been better if both fuselage halves were black.

That low-vis would have been MUCH better if they would have done a sky/cloud blue-gray scheme :( .

Posted (edited)

sighs the low vis looks kinda of yucky..while the stealth ver is quite acceptable but not outstanding in its choice of colors combo. And the stealth is a VF-1J Strike? Should be a VF-1S Strike instead :unsure::(

Looks like the money would go to the ver 2 GPB or another piece of the 1/60 VF-0S

Cheers

Edited by recon
Posted
perhaps fan feedback will be bad enough they'll go back to the drawing board like with the Vf-0....

371786[/snapback]

I hope.. how hard would it be to change to plastic color and get different paints? Yamato, give us a 1J or 1S head on that low-vis!!!!

Posted

The stealth isn't too bad, but it's not interesting enough to make me even consider getting it. The camo valk is pretty much the worst looking valk deco I've seen yet, barring any customs of course (that pink re-deco Red Comet did of a Banpresto comes to mind).

And a chrome launch arm? Whaaaaa? I didn't think Yamato was into the "chromed variant" BS that so many other toy companies subscribe to.

Oh well, I can't let something like a couple crummy Yamato repaints get me down when there is something as yummy as the Motoko and Tachi on the horizen!

Posted

I don't mind that VF-1J "Stealth" version, but I am really disappointed in the new "Low-Vis" scheme. Hopefully, these are just a trial run. If someone asked me if I would buy them, it would be VF-1J - yes, VF-1A no.

Posted

Well... those are just horrible Valks. The paint job, paint schemes... all is just wrong and hugly. A 10 years old boy can brush paint a better cammo than that. And the "low Viz"... not very creative. For such expensive toy they should do MUCH better.

Yamato wont sell much of those hugly things I guess.

Posted
Maybe next release will be a Gold Plated Valk. That will be just the worst ever.

I don't like the bandai Mac7 toys but the metal plated ones are pretty fun. I know it's tacky but if Yamato did a super limited metal-plated (appearance-wise) valk I would totally buy it.

Posted (edited)

What the ... I just saw these and man i'm on the fence. On the one hand its a new valk to have but on the other hand the paint jobs aren't working for me. I'll probably still get them but i hope they improve significantly before they go on the market.

yeah chrome would have been better but i wanted a sky/cloud scheme low viz

Edited by Macross73

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...