JB0 Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 Also in the Superman commentary, they talked about how they destroyed part of the environment when they brought in some dirt from on place to another and the bugs from the dirt attacked the new location's vegetation... Ooops... Quote
glane21 Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 What are you talking about? Bsu can't get that many midgets together... though he has tried... he just couldn't get that many... My "Midget Wrangler" was fired on the second day of filming. This lead to problems with the unions that plagued the production until the producers shut us down. I don't like to talk about that period of my life, to be honest. It was a real heartbreaker. What's all this about? Quote
glane21 Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 What are you talking about? Bsu can't get that many midgets together... though he has tried... he just couldn't get that many... My "Midget Wrangler" was fired on the second day of filming. This lead to problems with the unions that plagued the production until the producers shut us down. I don't like to talk about that period of my life, to be honest. It was a real heartbreaker. What's all this about? Quote
bsu legato Posted April 27, 2005 Author Posted April 27, 2005 What's all this about? My aborted "All Midget" adaptation of the LOTR trilogy. However, it looks like my All Midget remake of The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly is going to happen. Quote
JsARCLIGHT Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 My aborted "All Midget" adaptation of the LOTR trilogy. However, it looks like my All Midget remake of The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly is going to happen. Technically isn't it a "return to it's origins" then? It's well doccumented that The Good, The Bad and The Ugly was an "all norms" remake of the legendary 30's movie "Terror of Tiny Town"? Quote
bsu legato Posted April 27, 2005 Author Posted April 27, 2005 Technically isn't it a "return to it's origins" then? It's well doccumented that The Good, The Bad and The Ugly was an "all norms" remake of the legendary 30's movie "Terror of Tiny Town"? Well....you know...its...uhh... Damn, the whole thing is off! I was hoping that nobody would know that obscure bit of cinematic trivia. It was going to be featured on the DVD extras. We had a ToTT mini-doc all set and everything. Now I'll have to start on my all-albino remake of The Wild Bunch. Quote
JsARCLIGHT Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 How about an all midget albino remake of the Magnificent Seven? Vern Troyer could play the Yule Brenner role. Midget albino Steve McQueen! (looks back at Peter Jackson thread) Oh yeah... this was about PJ... Quote
Jemstone Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 I thought this thread was a joke playing off the Lucas one? Quote
Blaine23 Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 He's definitely a nut. And hairy. But unlike Lucas, he's actually directed a few good movies. If your fanboy heart is too hardened to enjoy LotR, then I suggest heading up to the video store and renting Heavenly Creatures. It's got great direction, great script, great acting... and a pert young Kate Winslet to boot. Quote
bsu legato Posted April 27, 2005 Author Posted April 27, 2005 (edited) But he cut Tom Bombadil from the movie because he hates me personally. And for that he can never be forgiven!! Edited to add something in BOLD FONT!! Edited April 27, 2005 by bsu legato Quote
Abombz!! Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 What has he done with his life? He has avoided a decent pair of paints for longer then any other man alive... that must count for something, right? Quote
Max Jenius Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 Peter Jackson does suck. It will be fun to see him direct something that everybody isn't going to automatically like regardless. LOTR is cool... but everything is pretty much laid out. Quote
Agent ONE Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 Let us not forget to keep things in perspective, the LOTR movies were no Conan the Barbarian. Therefore: John Milius > Peter Jackson Quote
do not disturb Posted April 27, 2005 Posted April 27, 2005 aren't peter jackson and michael moore bothers? Quote
chrono Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 Gotta love these.... "I HATE HIM BECAUSE HE'S SUCCESSFUL!" .... types of threads. King Kong's only being remade because who would be the person in that studio to tell Peter Jackson 'No' after making them several hundred million dollars? Let's hope that he stays remaking era re-makes and avoids making a 're-imagned' comic book movie!!! Quote
Myriad Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 what has Peter Jackson done with his life? He has given you a reason to complain about something.... Quote
yellowlightman Posted April 28, 2005 Posted April 28, 2005 Whatsup with PJ and shorts? I mean, really. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.