Ladic Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeszekely Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 I doubt it. It certainly looks interesting, but it's an illustration by Oliver something or other. PSM is a good magazine, but they're ALWAYS running drawings of what different people think every bit of Sony hardware will look like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hikuro Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 If SONY ever wanted to go wireless for controlers they better do a real good job at it, I don't trust wireless controlers as much as I trust universal remote controls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeszekely Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 If SONY ever wanted to go wireless for controlers they better do a real good job at it, I don't trust wireless controlers as much as I trust universal remote controls. Have you tried Logitech's wireless PS2 controller? For me, it's not that I'm leary of wireless as much as I am of third party controllers. But the Logitech controller for PS2 is actually really good... better than a regular Dual Shock 2. Better, even, than Nintendo's vaunted Wavebird. I've had zero lag and zero missed button presses with it, plus it just feels natural in your hand. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander McBride Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 (edited) I really hope Sony doesn't make it look like that. The reason being, with space at a premium, as mentioned, it's very important to be able to put things on top of PS3, and to even be able to side stand it. I certainly couldn't have the setup I'm using at the moment if it weren't for the side-stand ability of PS2. This was one of the biggest problems with Xbox, it was the size of a DVD player, but you couldn't put anything on top of it. For the same purposes, a front-loading drawer is important, as well. Edited March 21, 2005 by Commander McBride Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Druna Skass Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 I'm more inclined to think the PS3 will be more like a PC, taller than it is wide. If I ever get off my lazy @ss, I'll throw some sketch togeather of what I think it'll look like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bandit29 Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 If SONY ever wanted to go wireless for controlers they better do a real good job at it, I don't trust wireless controlers as much as I trust universal remote controls. Have you tried Logitech's wireless PS2 controller? For me, it's not that I'm leary of wireless as much as I am of third party controllers. But the Logitech controller for PS2 is actually really good... better than a regular Dual Shock 2. Better, even, than Nintendo's vaunted Wavebird. I've had zero lag and zero missed button presses with it, plus it just feels natural in your hand. Yep. That controller rules. Hell, the signal goes through walls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wesker99 Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 I don't see an expansion port either.. I think it looks like crap otherwise, but there were a few good ideas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladic Posted March 21, 2005 Author Share Posted March 21, 2005 I agree, some of the stuff look interesting. The Idea of wireless controllers is good, but only if they come with some kind of recharging base. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wes Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 If SONY ever wanted to go wireless for controlers they better do a real good job at it, I don't trust wireless controlers as much as I trust universal remote controls. Have you tried Logitech's wireless PS2 controller? For me, it's not that I'm leary of wireless as much as I am of third party controllers. But the Logitech controller for PS2 is actually really good... better than a regular Dual Shock 2. Better, even, than Nintendo's vaunted Wavebird. I've had zero lag and zero missed button presses with it, plus it just feels natural in your hand. Does it actually do the vibrations? Wavebird doesn't. Why do we even care about someone's ideas about the systems appearance? I just wanna know if the games are going to be worth dropping about $400 for them and the start-up fees... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twich Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 Has anyone read any of the stats for the upcoming chipsets for the next gen of consoles? The Xbox is rumored to have 3 3.0 Ghz core processors and the Cell Chip technology that is supposed to come in the next Playstation is staggering, exceeding that of the next xbox. I hear that both Nintendo and the XBox will have ATI graphics sets. I dont know about you guys, but I am very excited by what is coming for the next gen consoles, and all three are rumored to be backwards compatible....which is good news to be sure. Twich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrDisco Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 reminds me of an N64 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 Has anyone read any of the stats for the upcoming chipsets for the next gen of consoles?The Xbox is rumored to have 3 3.0 Ghz core processors and the Cell Chip technology that is supposed to come in the next Playstation is staggering, exceeding that of the next xbox. I hear that both Nintendo and the XBox will have ATI graphics sets. I dont know about you guys, but I am very excited by what is coming for the next gen consoles, and all three are rumored to be backwards compatible....which is good news to be sure. Twich XBox2 is also supposed to be using PowerPC chips(like Nintendo and Sony). And an ATI graphics chipset. So all 3 decks will be ATI/IBM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaijin Posted March 21, 2005 Share Posted March 21, 2005 (edited) If SONY ever wanted to go wireless for controlers they better do a real good job at it, I don't trust wireless controlers as much as I trust universal remote controls. Have you tried Logitech's wireless PS2 controller? For me, it's not that I'm leary of wireless as much as I am of third party controllers. But the Logitech controller for PS2 is actually really good... better than a regular Dual Shock 2. Better, even, than Nintendo's vaunted Wavebird. I've had zero lag and zero missed button presses with it, plus it just feels natural in your hand. Does it actually do the vibrations? Wavebird doesn't. Why do we even care about someone's ideas about the systems appearance? I just wanna know if the games are going to be worth dropping about $400 for them and the start-up fees... Regarding the Logitech controller...yes it does. Keep in mind that the new "Cordless Action" one is the one you want..not sure if teh old one had vibe but, the new one does and is the best PS2 controller around IMO. I like the HDMI support, but only if the games can truly take adavantage of the HDTV resolutions...720P at least...otherwise, the Component cables are fine. Edited March 21, 2005 by Gaijin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 I like the HDMI support, but only if the games can truly take adavantage of the HDTV resolutions...720P at least...otherwise, the Component cables are fine. I'd be shocked if they couldn't. ... But this IS Sony. Anyways, this is my favorite artist's rendition of the PS3... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valkyrie23 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 Has anyone read any of the stats for the upcoming chipsets for the next gen of consoles?The Xbox is rumored to have 3 3.0 Ghz core processors and the Cell Chip technology that is supposed to come in the next Playstation is staggering, exceeding that of the next xbox. I hear that both Nintendo and the XBox will have ATI graphics sets. I dont know about you guys, but I am very excited by what is coming for the next gen consoles, and all three are rumored to be backwards compatible....which is good news to be sure. Twich XBox2 is also supposed to be using PowerPC chips(like Nintendo and Sony). And an ATI graphics chipset. So all 3 decks will be ATI/IBM. Actually, PS3 will have a graphics chipset by NVIDIA. So even though NVIDIA lost out on XBOX 2 (or "XBOX 360"), they will probably make up sales with PS3 which will surely sell well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zentrandude Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 whats with the wings? its trying to be a maxi pad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 whats with the wings? its trying to be a maxi pad? *chuckles* GEEK MODE ON! They're controllers. The FamiCom(FamiClone, really) that the image is a photochop of had built-in controller storage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpacePirateNeko Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 ps3 will look like 2 big red X's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zentrandude Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 ps3 will look like 2 big red X's? nah ps3 will look like a game cube but with a ps logo on it. either that or a even thinner ps2 be like a sheet of paper sticking up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 ps3 will look like 2 big red X's? nah ps3 will look like a game cube but with a ps logo on it. either that or a even thinner ps2 be like a sheet of paper sticking up. That'd be cool... As a note... Sony ripped off an (unreleased) Atari computer case for the PS2 case. http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?st=1&c=270 They even list it as a reference on their case patent application. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Skull Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 I really don't care what the PS3 looks like, as long as it fits where I put it, I fine with whatever design Sony chooses. It isn't like your car or house where people will actually judge you, if it ends up looking really stupid but people will still buy it if it has really good hardware and games. Which brings on the two big questions, what are its specs going to be and what games will be launched when it first comes out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 I really don't care what the PS3 looks like, as long as it fits where I put it, I fine with whatever design Sony chooses. It isn't like your car or house where people will actually judge you, if it ends up looking really stupid but people will still buy it if it has really good hardware and games. Which brings on the two big questions, what are its specs going to be and what games will be launched when it first comes out? It's still nice to have a sexy case on the hardware. ... I love my 5200. Specs are all but unknown. Not that I take them seriously. Sony's known for lying out their butt about those. The CPU is a PowerPC* with 7 extra floating-point units. *This is so insanely funny, given how loudly PS2 fanboys were rambling about how the PS2's proprietary Emotion Engine processor was so much more powerful than the GameCube's "Gecko" PowerPC chip. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabretooth Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 i still get a chuckle when i hear that and how "awesome" re4 will be on the ps2 tee hee i love my cube Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 i still get a chuckle when i hear that and how "awesome" re4 will be on the ps2tee hee i love my cube *winces* I can only hope that's not a direct port... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Valkyrie Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 This design looks like N64, in the end it will like a PSX or a PC box. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coota0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 Actually I don't see what's wrong with something like a PC box, it's a nice uniform shape that's easy to put almost anywhere, and you can turn it on it's side still. Won't happen becuase it's not flashy enough, but what the heck, it owuld work out real nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lightning Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 I kinda like the idea about the blue line on the front lighting up when you turn it on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 Actually I don't see what's wrong with something like a PC box, it's a nice uniform shape that's easy to put almost anywhere, and you can turn it on it's side still. Won't happen becuase it's not flashy enough, but what the heck, it owuld work out real nice. Well, a standard PC case is also HUGE for a game console. Even monstrosities like the 5200 and NeoGeo are dwarfed by it. Sure a decent PC needs the space, but that's mainly because it's upgradable. A console is an all-in-one box and can be made to much tighter space restrictions. You could stuff a mini-ITX system into a console case, but I have a VERY low opinion of the sort of systems that the miniITX form factor gets. Personally, I like the design of the PS2. It looks good, and you can store stuff on it. Favorite is probably the white PS2s they released in Japan. Those were things of beauty. NES is nice for much the same reasons. But I'm finding myself increasingly drawn to various FamiClones, one of which I'm pretty sure will eventually win me over enough to replace my NES in my big stack o' systems. The 5200 is a gigantic chunk of plastic, but it's too dang sexy to hide. Sure it's over a foot square, but it's one of the best-looking giant chunks of plastic I've ever seen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadow Skull Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 A console is an all-in-one box and can be made to much tighter space restrictions. Hopefully game consoles will remain that way for a long time to come. I like video games but I really hate the idea of having to upgrade your PC almost everytime for the latest games. My money is finite resource that has to be used on other things besides games. The 5200 is a gigantic chunk of plastic, but it's too dang sexy to hide. Sure it's over a foot square, but it's one of the best-looking giant chunks of plastic I've ever seen. Agreed, that isn't bad looking. Any mention about its price? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellowlightman Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 Favorite is probably the white PS2s they released in Japan. Those were things of beauty. White, shmite. I have very little faith in Sony's design sense, so I'm expecting the PS3 to be pretty ugly. It's saving grace for me will likely be that I have yet to buy an American PS2, so if it's backwards compatible I'll likely grab one to catch up on games. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikeszekely Posted March 22, 2005 Share Posted March 22, 2005 The little bitty PSone was kind of nice. The PS2, and most of the VAIO line, is a bit lacking. But the PSP is damn sexy... maybe Sony ought to have those guys design the PS3, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JB0 Posted March 23, 2005 Share Posted March 23, 2005 A console is an all-in-one box and can be made to much tighter space restrictions. Hopefully game consoles will remain that way for a long time to come. I like video games but I really hate the idea of having to upgrade your PC almost everytime for the latest games. My money is finite resource that has to be used on other things besides games. My complaint is more along the lines of developers being lazy. I tend to throw cash at the hardware whenever I have some to spare, because I follow the software. The 5200 is a gigantic chunk of plastic, but it's too dang sexy to hide. Sure it's over a foot square, but it's one of the best-looking giant chunks of plastic I've ever seen. Agreed, that isn't bad looking. Any mention about its price? According to DigitPress.com, one should run about 30$. ... You ARE clear that this thing came out in 1982, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladic Posted March 24, 2005 Author Share Posted March 24, 2005 I like the HDMI support, but only if the games can truly take adavantage of the HDTV resolutions...720P at least...otherwise, the Component cables are fine. I'd be shocked if they couldn't. ... But this IS Sony. Anyways, this is my favorite artist's rendition of the PS3... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agass4u Posted March 24, 2005 Share Posted March 24, 2005 I don't care what the PS3 looks like, just as long as I don't have to see any more Disk Read Error screens. I have having to take my PS2 apart just to get an original game or DVD to play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.