Jump to content

JB0

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13224

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JB0

  1. JB0
    Female heroes? In MY Star Wars? What madness is this?!?!?!
  2. JB0
    All I'm sayin' is that I don't understand how the upcoming Boba Fett movie can make sense without ejecting the Holiday Special from canon!
  3. JB0
    As an internet provider, Comcast sucks super monkey balls, and in many areas enjoys a legally-mandated monopoly that gives them no incentive to improve and every incentive to gouge customers for all they are worth. As an entertainment company, though? I haven't heard anything terrible about Universal Pictures recently, and Comcast owns them(as well as NBC, but who watches BROADCAST?). I would be more comfortable with Comcast owning Fox than I am with Disney owning Fox. To be blunt, I'm surprised the justice department approved the merger, as I think Disney is ALREADY too big. (They apparently told Disney they had to sell the sports news portion off after the merger, but that is so small it seems like they threw it in just to pretend they care.) Optimally, I would like to see Fox auctioned off piecemeal. Let Disney get the "missing" Star Wars and Marvel licenses, spread the rest out a bit. Let Comcast buy some for NBCUniversal, let ATT buy some for Warner, etcetera. But there's no way that's happening. Fox doesn't want to spend the next decade selling off pieces, they want to get rid of everything but the news.
  4. JB0
    I'm an american, and I'm cheering for Comcast. I just don't think one company should have that much power.
  5. JB0
    It is comedy gold, and I thank you for it.
  6. JB0
    Thirded. I'm not so much "G-1 or G-TFO" as I am "These designs are complete trainwrecks, and I hate most of them on every conceivable level".
  7. JB0
  8. JB0
    That ... is a REALLY blonde Rick Hunter. Did he go super saiyan in a Robotech I missed?
  9. JB0
    That's what I was about to say!
  10. JB0
    I'm gonna agree. Really good robot and tank both. I'm tempted to grab it just because. (Holdin' out for a white shuttle that probably isn't coming on Take-off). The thing that bugs me most about the treads, aesthetically, is that they split a wheel when they fold up. I think they should've split between wheels instead, it would look much better. Other than that, I think their solution to the tank treads looks really cool. ... Alternatively, they could have used the wrong vehicle entirely, suffered the ire of the fans, and given me a stealth remake of Super Go-Bot Defendor. Because I had a toy of Defendor and it was awesome.
  11. JB0
    It means I find their site admin's inability to list a product for sale under the correct product name hilarious. I considered elaborating at the time, but opted against it. I don't recall why, but if I had to guess, I was posting from my cellphone/pocket PC and ran out of patience with the touch screen. Hadn't have even noticed the downvote. I only pay attention to the vote corner so I can upvote any posts I see downvoted*. I think this red arrow was just a lack of appreciation for my bizarre and off-kilter sense of humor. *To clarify the logic there: Most use of the downvote system I've seen appears to be a small and petty form of harassment, as someone runs through and carpet-bombs an entire page of posts, or every post one person makes, with red arrows for no discernible reason. I feel a green arrow on every red arrow to be a suitably small and petty response. I also kind of think the downvote system is a fundamentally bad idea that INVITES anonymous harassment, so undermining the entire system is a win in my book.
  12. JB0
    But which one is Swindle, and which is Counterswindle?
  13. JB0
    I don't think Fox has fully considered the benefits of MY offer. Sure if you go by straight dollar amounts, I can't afford to give them literally a hundred billion dollars. But in terms of non-cash perks, I am the only one offering to buy every member of the board a pack of gum. This seems like a good deal, and leaves Fox in the hands of someone that ISN'T blatantly evil. That's what I call a win-win, but they simply refuse to return my calls.
  14. JB0
    Occasionally.
  15. JB0
    I AM imagining a white repaint. Believe me. Honestly, if they do a white version, I'll probably buy it just for the vehicle mode.
  16. JB0
    They are, at best, refining some already finely-polished gems. Lion King and Beauty and the Beast didn't NEED remakes. The effort they expended for a slight improvement could've been spent on making a new movie that could stand alongside them. That they chose instead to do a remake of an already-good film smacks of creative bankruptcy. (I also admit to having had an inherent bias when they launched in on remakeapalooza, since it reminds me of that time in the 90s when they did a lot of dismal low-budget direct-to-video sequels... which was also an era of blatant creative bankruptcy)
  17. JB0
    Hot damn, that shuttle mode. That's what I'm talkin' about! I mean, the robot mode is a mess on multiple counts, and there were clearly large sacrifices made for the sake of vehicle mode (those legs...) But I can forgive a lot for a shuttle that looks like that. I mean, objectively, Broodlord Lashlayer(lol) is by far the better converting robot. He makes a good robot and a good shuttle. But Take Off makes a GREAT shuttle, so who cares if the robot mode is crap? Next up: An Omega Supreme that turns into an STS fuel tank, rocket boosters, and launch pad to mount him on! Who cares if it isn't even remotely logical? A man can dream, dammit!
  18. JB0
    I still hope this is all a prank by Fox, that they're gonna come back and be "Wait, you thought we were ACTUALLY selling everything? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!".
  19. JB0
    And thus did the stubby little wings on Broodlord Lashlayer(lol) start to make sense. I was wondering why they were a different scale than the rest of the orbiter. Any larger and the combiner arm would look pretty goofy(unless they added another hinge so they could wrap around, which introduces other problems), they would probably obstruct the elbow, AND they'd be too big for the chestplate gimmick to work. So trade some more vehicle accuracy for wins in the combiner mode. And no, I don't know why "wings coming out the back of the leg" doesn't strike me as goofy looking but "wings coming out the forearm" does.
  20. JB0
    Is there a reason UT used World of Warcraft names for everyone? Also, I gotta say I like not-Blastoff's shuttle mode.
  21. JB0
    I was partially joking, but I've always preferred the general toy aesthetic over the cartoon's flat, simplistic look. Certainly, the toys were all over the map in terms of proportions and articulation, but I always liked that they actually looked like they could turn into a thing(for the obvious reason of "because they could"), and that they tended to have a bunch of superfluous mechanical detailing. The cartoon often shucked both points for the sake of animation simplicity(or, perhaps, it depicts an alternate universe where ALL the Transformers were minicars).
  22. JB0
    Don't you have that backwards?
  23. JB0
    That is very appropriate for Grendizer.
  24. JB0
    PRO WEB MANAGER
  25. JB0
    In fairness to Burton, he was brought in fairly late on Planet of the Apes. To my understanding he wasn't happy with it either.
×
×
  • Create New...