Jump to content

JB0

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13231

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JB0

  1. JB0
    It is just plain stupid. I enjoyed it, though. Enough that I'm sad there wasn't a second season.
  2. JB0
    Yes, but not when they're fresh. Only markdowns are worthy of the battle.
  3. JB0
    Unless it is the Q. Rau. Then they add a gun and call it a Q. Rhea. In fairness, that IS a bit like comparing a BMW to a Model T. On-topic! As you offer no explanation for WHY you would make these changes or how they would improve the show, I am left to infer intent. I offer my thoughts on several points, but feel free to enlighten me. Why make him a fighter pilot? That is not a minor detail. Changing the main character's background and personality so drastically results in rather significant changes to the entire show. I dare say that once all the repercussions of this change ripple through the narrative, there is a good chance it won't be recognizable as Macross II anymore. Nah. Giant borg sounds kinda lame. ... More thoughtfully, it undermines a core theme of the franchise at the time. The enemies in Macross, despite being aliens from the other end of the galaxy, are not freakish monsters that can't be understood. They are people, not too dissimilar from ourselves. While circumstance has put them at odds with humanity, there is common ground, and if everyone would stop shooting for two seconds and just talk to each other, there might not be a reason to fight in the first place. Making the aliens overtly human helps underscore this message. Certainly, the idea that even "grotesque monsters" are, fundamentally, people like us is on-brand, one that's barely brushed against in DYRL, and saw only limited exploration in Seven(despite the latter's MUCH longer runtime). It is a concept worth exploring more. But as with making Hibiki a soldier instead of a reporter, it is a major change that carries broad repercussions for the overall presentation(if not necessarily the narrative). Without a careful rework of the show, it will just serve to de-humanize the mardook, turning them into targets we can feel good about slaughtering wholesale because they "aren't really people". And that seems to be very un-Macross. To what purpose? Paint schemes and robot legs are minor cosmetic tweaks that seem to not make much of a difference either way. I am open to an explanation, but see no way this can make the show better OR worse, just... slightly different, but not in any meaningful way. Let's point the lens elsewhere briefly to illustrate. Would the original Gundam look better in monochrome as originally intended instead of the crayola accident forced upon the production by sponsors? Absolutely! But would it make that series better or worse in any way other than the most superficially meaningless? Not really, no. Again, to what purpose? We spent basically all of the 90s determining that gore won't make a bad thing good, and a good thing isn't inherently improved by the inclusion of gore. It could emphasize the brutality of war, but since you also want to dehumanize the presentation of the mardook, I assume that is not your purpose. In light of that, I see no creative reason for adding viscera, it is just "because it is kool and edgy".
  4. JB0
    Define what a "real sequel" would be, in your eyes.
  5. JB0
    I'm pretty sure there's other options besides "audience of one" and "tasteless clowns".
  6. JB0
    "17 years later..." Impressive.
  7. JB0
    When he's done, can I borrow your truck? I'm builoing a solar power tower, and that looks to be the vehicle I need.
  8. JB0
    CG's cheap. Far cheaper than just about anything else, including hand illustration.
  9. JB0
    Well said.
  10. JB0
    You misunderstand. For some people, being angry IS the hobby. That it is being angry about plastic robots is secondary.
  11. JB0
    Nice! I never had these, but always thought the idea was cool.
  12. JB0
    I enjoyed it for what it was, but it really shouldn't have had the Gatchaman name attached as it is wholly unrelated. It is also largely character-driven, with very little in the way of cool fight scenes(I think there was one?). It will never become anything like Gatchaman, no matter how long you stick with it. Tatsunoko was "celebrating" their fiftieth year in business at the time, and I think they slapped the name on something already deep into production so they could claim to have made "a new Gatchaman" for the studio's anniversary.
  13. JB0
    That is pretty dang sexy. ... And my heart has already retconned it into a modernized Phantom Striker remake, which makes it much cooler. (Us Captain Power fans have to take our joy where we can find it.)
  14. JB0
    I'd hate to be the guy that had to design THAT inertial control system.
  15. JB0
    It is always night in space. The scene in question, the fighters are flying within Saturn's rings. Particularly, they have just flown into Saturn's shadow, so I think it is literally night flying. Most of the space fights ought to look like that, because space lacks any atmosphere to scatter light and generate broad illumination. There's actually good reason for them to be illuminated in the rings before they enter the shadow, for once(the material of the rings should reflect a lot of sunlight, scattering it through the area).
  16. JB0
    "There is love for Southern Cross, but we aren't sure why."
  17. JB0
    "We hereby find the defendant guilty of one count of reckless and awesome driving."
  18. JB0
    Almost no. I forget who, but someone licensed Macross 7 Trash for an english release. It never came out. They paid HG for a Macross license, and as I understand things Big West cancelled THEIR license because they don't negotiate with terrorists.
  19. JB0
    Wonder if it might be because of the whole Mac Zero F-14 circus.
  20. JB0
    I stand corrected!
  21. JB0
    At least they aren't letting Toynami make them anymore!
  22. JB0
    That's what struck me as weird. As near as I can tell, the companies involved with the GameBoy game are all dead(Take 2 bought publisher TDK Mediactive, and developer Lucky Chicken seems to have just died and vanished). ... Ah. Digging further, the company responsible for the Switch port is founded by the founders of Lucky Chicken. That explains that. I guess they took the assets with them, and then called HG up and asked for a license to re-release the game. And HG being HG, they just rubberstamped it once they were assured it was going on, like, actual game consoles and not as a freeware download on a fansite.
  23. JB0
    They make licensing papers. But point taken. They shoulda paid someone to port Battlecry instead of paying someone to port... Robotech: The Macross Saga, I guess was the title.
  24. JB0
    Grimlock: He didn't have a sword in the movie, so he gets no sword. Who cares if it is an iconic part of the character? Hot Rod: Yeah, this guy definitely needs a sword. Better make it a fancy two-piece one.
  25. JB0
    I note that, while the game was pretty blah, "most disappointing" and "worst" aren't the same thing. But still, it was a poor clone of the console DYRL game, and they shoulda ported Battlecry to the Switch.
×
×
  • Create New...