Jump to content

JB0

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13226

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JB0

  1. JB0
    Yeah, basically it was a problem with inbreeding, not with cloning PER SE. Since the zentradi, prior to "culturization" weren't breeding, there were no problems with inbreeding.
  2. JB0
    It is the best approach!
  3. JB0
    Well, we also know from Macross 7 that at least one Protoculture facility was programmed to look for zentradi hybrids and grant access to the facilities only in the presence of one. Which means that at least one group of protoculture desired to see a reunification between the PC and their warriors. One would assume they carried a similar attitude towards other engineered races, since Mylene's status as a zentradi-human hybrid instead of a zentradi-PC hybrid was not an issue. So not everyone viewed them as simple breeding stock.
  4. JB0
    Robotech: The Abridgd Series! Coming to a theater near you for an extremely brief time in 20XX.
  5. JB0
    I, on the other hand, kinda prefer the stupidly young nature of the heroes in SDF, because when you stop and look at it, it emphasizes how screwed-up their situation is.
  6. JB0
    Remember, time flows slower* in a fold than normal space, and they've spent a lot of time in fold space over the years. Hours become days, weeks become months, and everyone winds up with a calendar age that's much larger than the time they've actually experienced. Basically, they're both quite a bit younger than their dates of birth would suggest. *Even after Frontier's big ugly retcon... it doesn't do much for Max and Millia, who have lived most of their lives in a world without fold quartz, dealing with fold faults and the associated desyncs. They have not lived a life with 1:1 fold-time:real-time** ratios. **And Einstein is rolling in his grave at the proposition that a universal standard rate of time exists. But much of science-fiction sets him spinning, so meh.
  7. JB0
    In this thread we learn that pseudo-Grig can't count.
  8. JB0
    More than you would expect, given I am often driving after midnight down the freeway and some dumb kids with more money than sense have pimped their cars and race them down said freeway, using the shoulder as a passing lane. Just sayin'... you need a helluva suspension to isolate the driver from that many jolts.
  9. JB0
    I'd like to take a moment to point out that EVEN IF an infantry attack is viable, the Octos doesn't land enough of them to be useful. Six men might be useful for an operation involving stealth and finesse, but not a major landing operation. And if stealth is a concern you don't land in a thirty-foot robot with a pepperbox missile launcher. That's pretty much the exact opposite of stealthy. (Seriously, why DOES the Octos have a six-passenger compartment? It makes less than no sense.) Ya know, thinking about it... riding a Tomahawk sprinting at 180 km/h has to be an insanely rough ride. I'm starting to appreciate the wheels on the Cheyennes more.
  10. JB0
    Including this one? One!
  11. JB0
    Thanks! That will be a huge help in restoring the poor guy!
  12. JB0
    That makes sense.
  13. JB0
    Yeah. The repaint is way too monochromatic for my tastes. ... Well, the whole statue is not to my tastes, but the original design has a much better color palette.
  14. JB0
    Now let's compare the Octos to the most relevant comparison. If it's only useful for coastal attacks in which it will be deploying infantry... then it should be compared to other amphibious vehicles and landing craft. So the question is... how many destroids and troops can a Daedalus-class landing ship carry? The canon answer is apparently simply "many", though one can infer from the Daedalus Attack that it's significantly more punch than an Octos. And a Daedalus is self-sufficient. It doesn't need another vessel to carry it to the combat zone, as I imagine the Octos does(size precludes it carrying extensive stores for vehicle maintenance or human biological necessities, or even really much in the way of sleep facilities). I could see an argument for the Octos being used to secure a landing site FOR the Daedalus. We shall assume for the moment the target has strong anti-air defenses so we can't just call in the air force to carpet-bomb the beach ahead of us. But one would think a Monster on the deck would do the job more effectively and more economically. And when a Monster is the CHEAPER solution to the problem, it is time to step back, take a long hard look at things, and seriously reconsider what you're doing because something has gone VERY wrong somewhere. In that perspective, the first thing I would do with a second-gen Octos is ditch the crew compartment entirely. It's bloating the size of the vehicle for no benefit. Put a missile launcher in there, a large beam cannon, or just excise it entirely and shave a third of the vehicle's size in one shot, making it smaller, faster, and more capable.
  15. JB0
    Sterlings. *runs and hides*
  16. JB0
    Easy answer: Luca has a brother AND a sister. He's the youngest of three.
  17. JB0
    *digs his old Super Spay-C out* Ah, right. That's why he isn't on display somewhere. Because alone of all my games and toys, the yellowing demon has struck him HARD. And huh, I remember the cargo bay doors being openable in shuttle mode, but it seems the wings interfere with those hinges... ... Does anyone make replacement stickers for this guy, or would I have to scavenge from a tiny model/paint them by hand?
  18. JB0
    Oh, wow. That is super hot.
  19. JB0
    Man, if that tail fin pegs in, there is NO excuse for it to ride that far forward in shuttle mode. 'S an unmitigated embarassment.
  20. JB0
    That's kinda funny since both versions of Spay-C were actually pretty good renditions of the STS orbiter, within their target toy complexities. The larger one matches proportions and detail quite nicely, and even has opening cargo bay doors(I loved it as a child, and it still holds a special place in my heart, combining as it does two of my oldest loves). The smaller one is defiantly chibi, and has some sci-fi bling on top, but it still hides the robot parts and gets the curves and tail fin in the right place. Fortunately, Takara isn't offering a transforming STS Orbiter, they're offering a transforming Blast-Off robot. Because dear Primus, that's a TERRIBLE space shuttle rendition. Or perhaps it's a cybertronic space shuttle.
  21. JB0
    http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2016/01/21/evidence_found_of_a_possible_planet_in_the_outer_solar_system.html is a good read that avoids the whole "WHOO PLANET X" hype train. There's strongly suggestive evidence for the existence of a planet, but as of yet, one has not been found. It is compellingly strong evidence, but until an object is observed, it's circumstantial. It isn't the first time evidence has suggested a planet that didn't exist. Or vice-versa. We found Pluto through accident, as it happened to be where measurements implied a planet should be to account for variations in Neptune's orbit, but... those variations in Neptune's orbit were generated from bad measurements, Pluto wasn't actually big enough to cause them anyways, and it was sheer coincidence Pluto was in the sky at the place they were expecting to see a planet. Not to be a wet blanket or anything, just... all the "we found a new planet" stuff is a bit premature. Moreso than when the news was labelling every new Kuiper Belt Object a new planet. Also, one of the guys involved is the guy who got Pluto demoted FROM planet status. I find the irony amusing.
  22. JB0
    Oh, I guess that DOES make sense. I just assumed they were panties and a dress.
  23. JB0
    I find it... interesting... that removing their clothes also changes their underwear. Not good or bad, just a curious design decision.
  24. JB0
    Halle-friggin-leujah!
  25. JB0
    Based on the book. Hollywood can't make it up, they gotta buy it from someone else.
×
×
  • Create New...