Jump to content

JB0

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13359

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by JB0

  1. JB0
    I AM imagining a white repaint. Believe me. Honestly, if they do a white version, I'll probably buy it just for the vehicle mode.
  2. JB0
    They are, at best, refining some already finely-polished gems. Lion King and Beauty and the Beast didn't NEED remakes. The effort they expended for a slight improvement could've been spent on making a new movie that could stand alongside them. That they chose instead to do a remake of an already-good film smacks of creative bankruptcy. (I also admit to having had an inherent bias when they launched in on remakeapalooza, since it reminds me of that time in the 90s when they did a lot of dismal low-budget direct-to-video sequels... which was also an era of blatant creative bankruptcy)
  3. JB0
    Hot damn, that shuttle mode. That's what I'm talkin' about! I mean, the robot mode is a mess on multiple counts, and there were clearly large sacrifices made for the sake of vehicle mode (those legs...) But I can forgive a lot for a shuttle that looks like that. I mean, objectively, Broodlord Lashlayer(lol) is by far the better converting robot. He makes a good robot and a good shuttle. But Take Off makes a GREAT shuttle, so who cares if the robot mode is crap? Next up: An Omega Supreme that turns into an STS fuel tank, rocket boosters, and launch pad to mount him on! Who cares if it isn't even remotely logical? A man can dream, dammit!
  4. JB0
    I still hope this is all a prank by Fox, that they're gonna come back and be "Wait, you thought we were ACTUALLY selling everything? HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!".
  5. JB0
    And thus did the stubby little wings on Broodlord Lashlayer(lol) start to make sense. I was wondering why they were a different scale than the rest of the orbiter. Any larger and the combiner arm would look pretty goofy(unless they added another hinge so they could wrap around, which introduces other problems), they would probably obstruct the elbow, AND they'd be too big for the chestplate gimmick to work. So trade some more vehicle accuracy for wins in the combiner mode. And no, I don't know why "wings coming out the back of the leg" doesn't strike me as goofy looking but "wings coming out the forearm" does.
  6. JB0
    Is there a reason UT used World of Warcraft names for everyone? Also, I gotta say I like not-Blastoff's shuttle mode.
  7. JB0
    I was partially joking, but I've always preferred the general toy aesthetic over the cartoon's flat, simplistic look. Certainly, the toys were all over the map in terms of proportions and articulation, but I always liked that they actually looked like they could turn into a thing(for the obvious reason of "because they could"), and that they tended to have a bunch of superfluous mechanical detailing. The cartoon often shucked both points for the sake of animation simplicity(or, perhaps, it depicts an alternate universe where ALL the Transformers were minicars).
  8. JB0
    Don't you have that backwards?
  9. JB0
    That is very appropriate for Grendizer.
  10. JB0
    PRO WEB MANAGER
  11. JB0
    In fairness to Burton, he was brought in fairly late on Planet of the Apes. To my understanding he wasn't happy with it either.
  12. JB0
    Honestly, I'm pretty down on Disney's re-animations* as a general rule. I view them as a waste of time, that can only tarnish the reputation of the originals. But I'm making an exception here. Dumbo wasn't a work of passion honed to perfection. It was designed from the start to be cheap to produce and commercially attractive, thereby maximizing profitability at a time when the company was in bad shape financially. In short, Dumbo was a cynical cash grab. So it is hard to be mad that, most of a century later, another cynical cash grab is being made. I'll be sad to see the crows go, though I'm pretty sure they won't fly in the current era(no pun intended). They were the best part of the movie. *Let's be honest here, they aren't live-action movies. When your animated effects cover more of the screen for more of the runtime than your live-action footage, it ceases to be a live-action movie with animated effects and becomes an animated movie with live-action effects.
  13. JB0
    DE KULCHA!! I love how overbuilt the MC class is. Though ... how big is the crew on one of those behemoths?
  14. JB0
    GO COMCAST, GO!
  15. JB0
    Man, I hope in another three months Fox just pipes up and goes "just kidding, we were curious how much of a circus the offer would make."
  16. JB0
    That is just how bad "Disney buys Fox" is for us. Comcast is the LESSER evil.
  17. JB0
    Man, RE never had tank controls to start with. Tank controls is Battlezone/Vindicators/T-Mek twin-stick. Push up on both sticks to go forward, up on one and down on the other to turn. I AM A CROTCHETY OLD FART, GET OFF MY LAWN!
  18. JB0
    The website mechamericagreatagain.com definitely shows a Steam release. Well, actually it says "PC", but clicking that takes you to Steam, so...
  19. JB0
    No weirder than the rest of the cartoon was, anyways.
  20. JB0
    I was about to type that! Sniped!
  21. JB0
    I hate fake parts, and consider it cheating at best. May as well just go with part-swapping, it is exactly as honest and at least the transformation will be simpler.
  22. JB0
    Happy negative fifth birthday!
  23. JB0
    I'm the other way. Railgun is fun as heck, Index... isn't. Agreed on the Accelerator spinoff, though.
  24. JB0
    Fair enough. I actually laughed at that. Mostly because of how fast he ejected that tape. Weaponized music. And the Bay films were big on toilet humor. As long as Bumblebee doesn't pee on anyone, and no one's parents make comments about their self-stimulation, I think I'll be okay with whatever sense of humor they settle on.
  25. JB0
    Bumblebee as a yellow Bug? What madness is this?!
×
×
  • Create New...