sketchley

The numbering in the VF series is a bit more complex than you've indicated: VF-1, VF-3000, VF-4, VF-5*, VF-5000, VF-6*, VF-7*, VF-9, and then VF-11. So, as the VF-5000 is both emulating the VF-3000's numbering and a descendant of the VF-3000, it might be better to ask why the VF-3000 was numbered the way it was. * only appear in text.

What 👀's after the 5? 😂 Posting before coffee strikes again... 🥴

😅 It's a bit more than that. In general, the font in the 4k version is more legible (compare the ツ (tsu), and the relative size of the numbers in 4+0). However, the removal of the italicized !! is odd... 🤔

I think you may be—possibly me, too. Another explanation popped into mind: Max is the commander of the Unified Forces but Miria is the mayor of the city. There's a possibility that one or the other authorized the "Dejima" attaching to City 7, but due to their ongoing marital strife, that translated into neither side (UNS or municipal staff) getting around to properly fixing the "Dejima" (a frustratingly not-uncommon situation in Japan). In this scenario, Max merely took advantage of the situation and used it as the Fire Valkyrie's base of operations.

double post

Nope, you're not crazy. It's always been named that. I don't know what prompted Seto to include the F-35 in his list, as that is basically a retcon (I'm not sure if it's even official.) At the time the VF-4 was introduced (in the real world), Kawamori-san merely extrapolated that if "X" fighter is "name" II as it is the second fighter with the same name (E.g. A-7 Corsair II), and as the VF-4 is being introduced 40 or 50 years in the future, it makes sense that the VF-4 would be the Nth iteration of a fighter baring the same name. Kawamori-san has also mentioned in an interview that he has found that people find odd numbered vehicles to be more realistic than even numbers. Thus there are more odd numbered Valkyries (Sv-51, VA-3, VF-3000, VF-5, VF-5000, VF-9, VF-11, VF-17, VF-19, etc.) than even numbered ones (VF-0, VAB-2, VF-4, VB-6, VF-14, etc.) And by that logic, the "Lightning III" is better than the "Lightning II". This is as much a testament to Kawamori san's foresight as it is to his research. The most vivid example is how strikingly similar the Su-47 Berkut (1997) looks to the VF-19 (1994)—which Kawamori-san has indicated is based on the Grumman X-29 (1984)!

I did, too. 😅 No worries. Every site/community/version of English has their own words. For example, when students do a test, is it "write a test", "sit a test", or "take a test"? All are correct, but at the same time, mean wildly different things depending on who you say it to. Nevertheless, I can appreciate how much more fun and easy "floppies" is than "mirrored manga", or the mouthful "manga printed in the Western left to right format".

Perhaps that was the justification all along? Macross 7 depicts Project M basically from its first combat sortie. The show doesn't go into much detail about that project's origins, or the amount of time it took to (secretly) manufacture Basara's Fire Valkyrie, set up the special arrangement with Ray Loverock, etc. And then there are questions about how long the idea behind it was gestating in the back of Captain Jiinasu's mind. If Captain Jiinasu was laying the foundation for such plans years in advance, it definitely puts a new spin on his "genius"!

I think I may have solved that riddle: in the bottom-most text (starting with the ※ symbol), Kazutaka Miyatake-san has written "アクショ (Akusho)". The romanization of the Katakana on a character-by-character basis is "Akushio/Acushio", and as the "u" sound is basically dropped in the Kanto dialect, that is further reduced to "Akshio/Acshio" (what appears in romaji at the top of the picture). When we change アクショ (Akusho) into kanji, we get "悪所": literally "dangerous area" (an alternative is "red-light district", but from the context in the show, this interpretation seems far less likely). Thus, the official name is "出島 (Dejima)" (unclear if it is a literal description or a reference to the historical island in Nagasaki), and the garbled "Acshio" (pronounced "Akusho") is the slang term for it. I don't know why the writers of that Japanese publication mistook Miyatake-san's note as the romaji name of the ship. 🤷‍♂️ Did they mistake Miyatake-san's intended "(this is a) slang (name)" for "(this means) slang"? This is also another instance where it's obvious that the staff working on the book at the publisher are not Macross fans... 🙄

That was my initial impression of the vessel as well. However, after moving to Japan, and seeing a certain volume of domestic travel shows (and etc.), it now looks closer to the larger ferries that they use here (on what amounts to overnight ferry trips) than to a cruise ship. On those ferries you get 3 types of seating: airline-style chairs (what is depicted in M+) futon-sized areas to lie down on, sit cross-legged, etc. (relatively soft floors - akin to carpeted ones with underlay) individual cabins (akin to the private rooms on overnight trains) This is consistent with both the depiction in Macross Plus and the Macross Chronicle description. In that context, it is plausible that on the shorter runs, the lower decks of the vessel are for 'vehicle' storage—up to 1/4 to 1/3 of the internal volume. That's a not insignificant number of 'cargo' trucks, in other words! Would just like to point out that 豪華客船 can be translated 2 ways: luxury cruise ship luxury liner/passenger boat Digging a bit deeper on Japanese websites, it seems to be an equal 50/50 split, with some people referring to (E.g. Princess Cruise's) cruise ships as both クルーズ客船 and 豪華客船, and other types of ships, such as ocean liners (E.g. the Titanic), as 豪華客船. The meaning also includes "state ships" (E.g HMY Britannia)! 😵 In general, the meaning appears to be mostly "a luxury vessel people use for transportation", and has much less of the "a luxury vessel people vacation on" nuance.

That's quite nice. Didn't realize you intended to go that hardcore on rust! 😅 Nevertheless, the rust effects came out quite nice—I especially like the bits that look like there are rust bubbles just below the top coat of paint! Perhaps the next step you can try is the "salt technique" (if memory serves: you paint a base metallic or silver coat, blob salt crystals strategically on top of that. Do the top coat, and then remove the salt. The end result looks like scratch marks and deep gouges, or something like that.)

I understand where you are coming from. There are many creative decisions that Kawamori-san has taken for reasons other than story.* However, as the music labels are more or less directly sponsoring the anime (in return for music sales), it's hard for any new Macross series to move beyond the popular musical genres. I guess one could always look to "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" for a taste of what a non-singing musical encounter with aliens would be like... * Such as: VF-171 as the main fighter in Macross F (reason: the VF-19 was judged to look too similar to the hero VF-25) dancing VFs in Macross Delta (reason: to justify the existence of piloted transforming jets in the era of unmanned drones) not using Zentradi ships in allied forces in later series (reason: to not confuse the casual viewer) At the same time, Kawamori-san includes quite esoteric details, such as is making sure that the missile exhaust colours are different so that one knows that it was a heat-seeking AIM-9 Sidewinder (orange exhaust) and then a radar-guided AIM-120 AMRAAM (blue exhaust) that were launched in that scene in Macross Zero when Shin's F-14 shoots down the MiG-29 with a pair of missiles! 🤷‍♂️

Thanks for the close up picts! This is what I was able to glean from it: Red: raised ink ("hills and valleys"). Looks similar to the results I get when I used oil-based manga ink. Appears to be added last. Purple: dust artifacts. Some (black bits?) were added after the fact (paint transfers?), but there is some mixed in with the white/light grey (note the specular highlights in the lower right part of the triangle). Also appears to be some paper distortion when thin paints (like watercolour) soak into it (it's especially visible in the black area to the right of the yellow circle). Green: what appears to be a bubble artifact most likely in the darker grey layer under the top whitish colour. Yellow: parallel scratch marks. Indicating that the material used in the black layer didn't bond with the paint under it. I've heard that Japanese artists use "sumi" (the black ink used in calligraphy) to fill in large black areas. If the underlying layer is an acrylic or otherwise water repellent layer, it makes sense that the sumi wouldn't bond and be easily scratched off.

Whoops! Wrong thread! 😅 ※ Edit: probably should have said: "posted here by accident. Ignore this post."

I'd also recommend starting on a part that is less visible or covered by other parts to try it out—even those erasable methods can be difficult to remove from certain places (narrow gaps, etc.) In general, liquids are easier to apply, and it's usually much easier to add more later than it is to remove excess amounts. Incidentally, do you have another model (E.g. one that is cheap as chips, or that you can 'afford' to lose if things go to pot) to try weathering techniques on first?