Knight26

Man am I dense today, you are recreating that image in the back of perfect memory, now that just makes it cooler.

I'll see about doing a review of it tomorrow Shin.

Interesting, what did you use for her body?

I'm digging that Thundercracker, he turns into a freaking Su-37.

And the original 1999 Santa Feral

2000

2001 bonus

2001

2002

2003

Well I just finished this years Christmas card hope you all enjoy, and for those who have not seen them I will also attach the previous years cards, all the way back to the original Santa Feral back in 1999.

Yes I have the BBI hornet, it is pretty sweat, IMHO. My biggest complaints are the plastic undercarriage, a diecast one would have been far better and would not have added much to the cost. Also the weapons mix, I would have prefered a few more missiles and bombs so you could mix up the loads, as well as FLIR and Lantrin pods and Sparrows for fitting on the conformal missile pads on the intakes. I'm hoping someone comes up with some aftermarket weapons to slap on there, just to mix it all up.

All the BBI 1/18 toys have working undercarriage. So do the WWII 21st century ultimate soldier XD planes, and the upcoming F-4 and F-104 from 21st. And their long behind A-10. Knight did you ever see the proto for the 1/18 A-10? Also, the BBI P-51 just came out and they say it RIVALS the 21st XD version. SHin you say there is a proto of a 1:18 A-10? You must show me a picture.

WHo is HHH, or Triple H?

Oooh, I am tempted, please make an A-10, a MiG-29, etc... Man how cool would it be to have a 1:18 Su-37. I want to make a 1:18 air museum out of my next place.

HH are those fighters from the original Yukikaze illustrations, because they look great, wish they had used those instead of the ones in the anime.

*shakes head* They look fugly and worse then that the look to comprise the perfomance too much to be of any value, wake up boyo "muscular" looking planes rarely perform well. I just was speaking of the look. Also, I did check them out from some other angles, while they look OK from the sides, they really do look like crap from above. Some muscular planes perform quite well. How about the F-14, the F-15, or the MiG-31? Your definition of muscular and mine must be very different, I do not see the F-14, F-15 as being "muscular" they are sleak and sexy. "Muscular" planes to me are you Mig-25/31 (fast but horrid manueverability), F-4s, Jaguars, TOrnadoes, etc...

ACtually in the 80's there was a concept for using converted 747s as long range cruise missile carrying bombers. They would have had multiple rotary racks filled with cruise missiles, interesting concept but was eventually rejected. I should have a picture somewhere of the concept model.

My god a pirate 747, that's just funny looking.

*shakes head* They look fugly and worse then that the look to comprise the perfomance too much to be of any value, wake up boyo "muscular" looking planes rarely perform well.

I remember that it is from the area-88 manga, very cool but completely impractical.

I've donated every year since my freshman year of college, very good program, my sister keeps telling me to donate my valks.

Man I want to play this game but I am a PC Gamer only, anyone know of any good, stable, non-viral X-Box emulator that will run Halo-2?

You know the more I look at the F-16 CFTs the more I dislike them. Not only are butt fugly but I can't see how they don't just thrash the aerodynamics of the aircraft. Also with how they rise vertically as they move outboard just seems so wrong and like it will create alot of drag and airflow problems. I realize there was no other place to mount them but there had to be a better solution then this.

must have sub of movie, appleseed rocks