IAD

More? Somebody was a bit worried about infantry sticking magnetic mines on them? Not that the two look anything alike, but the profusion of turrets and guns immediately made me think of this: http://www.track-link.net/gallery/119 (Turns out the thing never really existed... Oh well, Stalin was still nuts.) ~Luke

Wow, does it have enough guns? ~Luke

Sounds good. Re: lens flare: No, it looks great, in my opinion. Reminds me of Macross Zero, the well-blended CG+cel work. ~Luke

Wow....... That's really funny, because even on a suitable plane, I can't even fly an axial roll to save my life, and my inverted looks inebriated In short, my piloting skills are (overall) somewhat lacking. It's all psychological, I guess... I always looked at extra control surfaces and what-not as a safe-guard against losing control at low speed*... (Not to mention improving maneuverability.) I guess to most people, they just add intimidation factor... ~Luke *For instance, right after the cobra-pullout-thing, when the left wing started to drop a bit, I was able to thrust-vector it back to level, even though my airspeed was still very low. That's what I call neat, and a nice feature to have!

Well, I guess they didn't have enough aircraft techs on the design team, because the compendium says it has a 55mm gunpod, with a 120 rnd. magazine... According to my quick calculations, 66 of the 55mm rounds would fit in the F-15/16 drum, taking only the the cross-sectional area into account. The magazine on the SV is about 18 ft. long.... So, you're definitely right, it should (could) have had a lot more ammo in there... Oh well, maybe all that 55mm ammo was too heavy... ~Luke

Gotcha. I'll post photos before I mod yours, so that you can make the call, recessed or not. I say... What is that thing loading? A 250 round clip, or something? It's huge! ~Luke

I've started the tissue covering... I've got both nacelles done, along with most of the lifting body, forward of the nacelle tops. I've also found a way to save ~0.1 oz... I remove the 'gunpod' piece, that goes between the legs in fighter mode, and replace it with two pieces of sheet foam. In the end, it all looks the same, but it's hollow, and thus somewhat lighter. (On mine, I've recessed the top sheet foam piece by about 1/32", to define the gunpod/fuselage interface. Can't tell yet if I like the way it looks. Needs a bit of paint.) ~Luke

Yes, I know what you mean there... My hands still shake a bit before launching. ~Luke

Really, it's easy to fly... REALLY! (Yes, I know, I'm always saying "Yikes!" or "Whoa!" or "Oops!" on the videos, but that's just me. Hey, after all those exclamations, I haven't had any real airframe damage yet. That should say something. ) I would avoid the snow, unless you have a clear-coat which is very light and waterproof. (Weight is a big deal here.) If however, you have something that satisfies the aforementioned requirements, powdery snow is very good at preventing crash-damage. ~Luke

I see, that makes sense. Ok, then, white it shall be. ~Luke

Ok, got those control run covers finished. Looking very spiffy. Sean, I'm going to get the tissue to cover the airframe today or tomorrow... Should I see if I can get it in pink, to reduce the amount of paint you'll have to throw at the thing for the base coat? (It won't be a perfectly uniform color, but closer, all the same.) ~Luke

Well, the usual updates: First, I finally got all the fins glued on the second airframe. I also installed some balsa rails in the bottom of the nacelles, to protect them from denting. (My ship has had major issues with dents forming along the relatively sharp edges on the bottom of the nacelles.) The balsa should keep everything looking crisp. I also have the balsa intake lips built into the intake boxes, which are key to good thrust. They'll also give me something to mount the intake sawtooth to. I was going to shape and install the control run covers tonight, but after repeated tries at sanding the things to the right shape, I just couldn't get it to look right. (Mad) No matter, I'll try again in the morning. Funny how these small bits can be so much harder to shape correctly. I've also come up with a way to save perhaps 0.25 oz. on both airframes. I'll test it on mine first. In the end, though, I may have to install another servo for pure ailerons (improving the turning aerodynamics) so actual weight savings will be more like 0.125 oz... Still, every little bit helps. ~Luke

Yes, they threw the CG off a bit [more] and seemed to add a lot of drag. They were skewed off from the centerline, though... (Small mounting mistake.) I'll probably try a flight with the tanks again, properly mounted, after I get the fan issue ironed out. ~Luke

http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.ph...4&postcount=502 A short video, showing an attempted roll, which resulted in my discovering that with the right control inputs, a 'sorta-cobra' may be possible. Similar (at a less massive scale) to the maneuver Ivanov used after perforating the tanker in the 4th episode. ~Luke

Furthermore, recomputated current draw, etc.: Duration: 4:16 (m:s) Total mAH removed from pack: 885 mAH Average current draw: 12.44 A Predicted max. duration: 6:16 (m:s) ~Luke

I just did another flight on mine... Did my best to find the limits of the airframe. There are a few things that need changing, I think. Anyway, things I discovered: It will loop, but just barely. It won't roll, or at least, I don't dare do more than a roll inverted and pull out. (The roll rate is just too slow to comfortably pull the maneuver off.) It will fly straight and level at about 60% throttle. Launches are easy, with the balance point in the correct position. It does bleed airspeed rather quickly in a turn. Now as a jet, it's sort of expected not to pull extremely tight turns, but I think the aerodynamics are also playing a major role here. Particularly the massive elevons, which turn into spoilers, when up elevator is applied. In a motor-out condition, the aircraft is still fairly controllable, though the asymmetric thrust-vector does make the handling somewhat odd. Motor heating is the worst of the problems I encountered. The motors actually became hot enough after several minutes of flying to loosen the plastic fan units, and throw both fans. I'll be looking into solutions, though the most obvious is to limit full-throttle runs as much as possible. (It is in the 90's here, though, which definitely doesn't help.) The airframe is extremely durable. I took a radio hit (I need to look into this) and ended up stalled out, and dropped ~75' vertically into a garden, with the nose down by about 10 deg.. The resulting impact caused no damage, and I logged another flight directly afterwards. Landing is simply a matter making a shallow approach, and just before the lower fins touch, applying up elevator and a bit of throttle. Anyway, modifications I'm looking at have to do with separating the ailerons and flaps, to improve speed retention in turns, and improving roll rate. Fortunately, this won't delay building the second SV... Video will be forthcoming... Sometime. ~Luke

Wow, you got to sit in a Mi-24! I always liked the Hind... Sort of like the A-10... So ugly it looks great. (Nice 'eyes' on the intake covers!) Sounds like you're busy. The lineart looks good, though! '...A rocket/mortar attack... once a night... All in all a good time.' I guess a bad time would be a mortar attack more than once a night? Stay safe over there! ~Luke

So... Any new material on the horizon? ~Luke

Well, I've got the nose hollowed out and mounted, the main gear access hatch cut, and the lower fins aligned and installed. 5.2 oz., right now. Target is 6.6 oz. with tissue, and I still have about 0.2 oz. of foam to remove, so basically, I'm right where I ought to be. ~Luke

The pitch up was uncommanded. Because of the nose-light condition, the canards were trimmed to operating at a negative angle of attack. My theory is the pitch up resulted from the canards stalling out. (Granted, a sort of inverted stall, but...) This would have reduced/eliminated the downforce generated by the canards, causing the aircraft to pitch up. The resulting vertical decent is testimony to just how nose-light it was. I probably could have recovered by applying throttle and down thrust-vector, but I was unsure whether or not the thrown fan was going to lock up the motor, so I was reluctant to bring the motors back online. (No need to burn out an ESC.) ~Luke

HAHA! Yes, that sequence was classic... --SWAPZzzzzz!-- "Whoa! Fan's gone......." "Ooh... It glides..." -Pause- "Uh-oh." ~Luke

The still photos, you mean? That's funny! Here's a little composite I threw together... Should have posted this before, so you could have convinced them there's a secret squadron of these things... ~Luke

Ivanov flies again, and lives to fight another day.... http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.ph...0&postcount=488 Bit of pseudo-technical commentary... http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showpost.ph...4&postcount=489 Latest flight video can be seen there... It does look nice in the air with the tip-tanks! ~Luke

Bit behind schedule, but the wings are now thoroughly and permanently attached to the airframe, and perfectly aligned. Moving right along. ~Luke

Here's a couple pictures... Note the carbon-fiber wing spars! ~Luke