What's funny is that, for all of Keith's rantings about "artistic integrity," the version he's promoting isn't even a "real" director's cut of Blade Runner. If he had bothered to actually read anything about BR, he'd have known that the 1992 "Directors Cut" was merely a rerelease that was teaked with some suggestions made by Ridley Scott. The real director's cut was to be based off of the infamous Workprint that resurfaced about the same time, but due to a number of factors that project never made it very far. This same workprint was to be the basis of the uber box set, but again that project is stillborn. If anybody (and we all know who I'm referring to) choses not to believe me, then I suggest picking up a copy of "Future Noir: The Making of Blade Runner" which explains this whole story in much greater detail.