Jump to content

David Hingtgen

Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17129

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by David Hingtgen

  1. David Hingtgen
    I really hope if they ever do release a DX, they outline/shadow the crests on the wings, and don't do like the anniversary YF-29, where it's "white printed on very slightly off-white". The logo/design is far too cool, to be invisible.
  2. David Hingtgen
    NOW can we have the Revan cameo/episode?
  3. David Hingtgen
    I need a lot more pics of fighter mode, but right now I'm thinking the 1/60 is better in that regard.
  4. David Hingtgen
    P/CP, and BlastOff, are both in the "if I saw them at retail, for normal/sale Deluxe prices, I wouldn't even have to think about it". But $50 for two deluxes at Amazon, is just plain "no". I'll just put the money towards Ox/MMC's BlastOff. PS---I loved my G1 P/CP, and really hope for a 3P version. You could do so much more, if you actually, had, you know, a budget...
  5. David Hingtgen
    Is your F-16's canopy scratched/nicked, and no longer rated for Mach 2+? Just buff it out with some Tex-whiz!
  6. David Hingtgen

    Macross figures

    David Hingtgen replied to CF18's topic in Toys

    Clear plastic is always more brittle than opaque*, and frankly shouldn't be used for any piece under stress, that's a tight fit, is a hinge, or bears weight. It WILL crack, and then break, eventually. It simpoly has no "give" at all. It won't bend 1 degree, it'll just microscopically crack. *we're talking among the normal ABS/PS/PE/PC used for figures, not "miracle plastics" like F-16 canopy material...
  7. David Hingtgen
    Not 1/10 as a bad as the new Thundercats, but not half as good as I was hoping/expecting. Odds of watching it just sank 90%.
  8. David Hingtgen
    That doesn't even LOOK like a VF-4, from head-on. I've had some issues with the master files before, but this is the worst by far. Even ignoring wing/fin angles---it looks like they used the F-15 or something for the nose/fuselage/canopy head-on.
  9. David Hingtgen
    Look closer. They’re both triple-changers, with their aerial-mode kibble present. Not as much, but totally there. Red one: shoulders are a Harrier’s intakes, wings are coming off the shoulders, abdomen has the nosegear, knees are the rear exhausts. Shins are the wing’s underside bulges where the outrigger gear retract into, with the gear struts going down into the ankles. Blue: cockpit chest, rotor blades and hub on back. Triceps? I suspect he’s an Apache, but there’s not a lot to go by.
  10. David Hingtgen
    Stupidly expensive? Relative to the same company’s $800 Millenium Falcon?
  11. David Hingtgen
    And just to avoid my hourly rebuttals at TFW: No, the red one cannot be the jet-bot we saw in the trailer. Those are Harrier parts, not F-4 Phantom parts. And the right one's other alt-mode is a helicopter, not a jet, so the two can't combine into a jet.
  12. David Hingtgen
    I read that Lego paid $$$ for the Bond license for use in Dimensions—but with that killed, it’s “use it or lose it”——so we get a DB5 set.
  13. David Hingtgen
    I got a trailer for this in front of Ant-Man 2—-But I think it’s the one we saw before, and it said “July”. So either they were supposed to show a new trailer but got the old one, or the new one is very similar and the change to Dec is so recent the new trailer still says July.
  14. David Hingtgen
    Sweden has "highway capability" as a requirement for all their planes---Viggen/Gripen etc are designed to use "straight stretches of road" as temporary bases.
  15. David Hingtgen
    I love the Emerald Force logo, always thought it'd look very neat tampo'd on a 19F/S, vs being a mere sticker. Was there ever a quasi-official Diamond Force logo? Put it on Gamlin's -22...
  16. David Hingtgen
    Got my Mirage parts today——is there an easy way to tell which forearm shield is L/R? They are very similar but not identical—-the mounting points are like 1mm offset from center and slightly angled, and they are perfectly mirrored so I’m pretty sure it’s intentional. (And being dedicated L/R I’m disappointed the numbering isn’t mirrored)
  17. David Hingtgen
    We haven't had the toys match the quality of the show since Animated. And it's on a downward trend.
  18. David Hingtgen
    Thundercracker, Hot Rod, Wheeljack, and Prowl, all as their G1 selves in the new show? Pleasantly surprised. https://transformers.hasbro.com/en-us/brands/cyberverse (Even more surprising is that we seem to be getting Slipstream AND a new female ‘Con)
  19. David Hingtgen
    Hmmm, I’ll have to start paying more attention to if port-of-entry is related to shipping method.
  20. David Hingtgen
    Mine are at least in the US, but still sitting in NY customs for a week. (Chicago is my preferred port of entry---it's both closer, and they seem to be consistently faster than NY or LA)
  21. David Hingtgen
    I sure hope so. Will be interesting to see if they use the recently (compared to the last main AC game) released YF-23 drawings and "do it proper" vs just copying the Italeri kit like everyone else... (the Italeri kit's intakes are totally wrong, the nacelles are somewhat wrong)
  22. David Hingtgen
    Rouge turned out awful? I haven't followed it closely---what'd I miss/what are the issues? (Honestly I'll probably wait for like Windblade/Nautica, to buy a 3P MP fembot) Also, checking in on the FT Menasor thread over at TFW---it's 3x as big now, and not one comment about the alt-modes. Every single post since mine, has been about SCALE. Yeesh. The one thing that is beyond pointless to discuss. They're not even consistent to themselves, much less other characters... It's clear the fandom cares about scale, scale, scale, and scale. Transformation, bot mode, appearance/color/paint, are all "raindrops in the ocean" compared to HOW DOES IT SCALE TO MP-10?!?! (and of course----MP Prime 3.0 is coming, and that'll just reset everything again)
  23. David Hingtgen
    Gah, FT just showed their Stunticons (well, 2 of them) and after pointing out over at TFW how they got Breakdown's spoiler totally wrong (ironically, FT has named him "Spoiler"), and I "kept glancing over at Wildrider", I realized---they are not basing their Stunticons on the real cars. They are going 100% toon-accurate for the cars. That makes them a bit goofy-looking IMHO, and is the exact opposite of what I want. Sigh, still waiting for someone to simply do "early MP style" Stunticons. What's early MP? Think Sideswipe, Datsuns, and Wheeljack. As realistic an alt-mode as possible, and the robot mode is a hybrid of the best/signature elements of the toon and toy. Not "uber-toon-ified to the point of being bland and copying animation errors" (because, the toon itself, was referencing the original toys, and any shape/color accent on the character model is usually a simplified version of a nifty sculpted 3D area on the toy)
  24. David Hingtgen
    Jaguar mounts AIM-9’s above the wings as the normal procedure:
  25. David Hingtgen
    Lego ruined it IMHO. Combined form may be a smidge better in some areas, but they absolutely ruined the lions to do so. Not worth the massive trade-off. Lego seems to be doubling down on what they did with “ship in a bottle” (Far less cool than the original idea) They seem to be altering the submissions more and more as time goes on——the early ones were only slight tweaks to the submissions, but now they’re basically redoing them from scratch, and coming up with inferior versions. And wow, since when did yellow lion have an F-15’s tailfins mounted on it?
×
×
  • Create New...