Jump to content

Xigfrid

Members
  • Posts

    2602
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Xigfrid

  1. @kajnrig thank you for the feedback, I am sorry for the fit issues you are facing. As per the 1:60 scale, for the assembly I don't even bother with sanding the parts before assembly, I just clip the FUD inside the WSF shells.

    You are probably right about the fact that this model should be exclusively made in FUD, but it would be only fixed position because I can't see how one can insert a pin in the parts made in FUD without breaking it. Anyway, I hope you will finish it soon :)

     

    As per my copy, I am done with sanding the outside shell and I will now mask and paint it !

    2536AB62-C3C0-4DC3-9F0A-4DF844458ECB.jpeg

  2. 8 hours ago, Mommar said:

    I really wish I had the time to prep these things.

    You should give it a try. I never sanded any pylons, the white ones are small and half hidden under the wings anyway.

    The AMM look like a nightmare to prepare, but a few of the bigger ones are really easy to prepare and sand.

    For instance, I ordered in WSF Polished the TMM missiles and after 2 primer layers and 1 quick sand, they are good to display, that's the same for the ACSWS-1D (1A also I guess). You can sand by hand or using dremel tool EZ413 (240 grit disc) for sharp and quick results.
    The PaCSWS are a bit more curved but rather easy and fast to sand with the Dremel tool 472S

    Most of the time spent btw is the long 24H wait to let the last primer layer to cure and to be able to sand it.

  3. Well if you make display models only, the best material for you is FUD: a bit more expensive than WSF Polished but, you barely need to sand it and the material can hold very small details as small as 0.1mm-0.2mm.

    I generally design for 1/60 scale and it means that's a toy and you need to play with it: yeah! FUD will be too fragile to allow the missile to be plug in and out of the pylon, that's why I print them in WSF. The polishing process from Shapeways is rough on the part and that's why you can have breakage on small details, but because I design panel lines to sustain 2-3 layers of prime and sanding, the polishing process won't "erase them".  It costs only 1 USD to have your model polished, to me it can be worth on models that cost at least 10 USD and that you don't mind having < 1mm diameter polished edges.

    I use only Sketchup but I wish I had more time to learn a 3D parametric software. Sketchup makes it so hard to re-cycle/enhance previous model, this is more like you have to make the work twice than making a simple upgrade. You can work directly to the 1:72 scale with Sketchup, but if you don't feel confortable, just work at 10x the scale (10:72) and export it at 1/10th the size for the printer.

  4. 4 hours ago, Blue Meanie said:

    Anyone make a part like that Visor for the F that just plugs into the space where the horn goes?

    That’s exactly what I was thinking, perhaps the unicorn is highly respected in Japan 

  5. I would add that I highly don't recommend Tamiya TS Spray on first attempts, laying a thick lacquer WILL react and dissolve Arcadia and Bandai original paint. Choose a good Acrylic spray instead and stay safe by laying fine layers from at least 40cm away from the model at approx 20°C room temperature. (stay away from the plastic model Revell clear sprays!)

  6. Well, you technically can 3D print the hard point that broke. Glue it back and call it a day.  Or even better, like @Mommar glue back the original hard point that broke and don't think too much about it.

    On this particular case,  the complicating thing is that the hard points are molded into the complete wing so you want to 3D print the whole wing. Modeling the wing from the drawings should be straight forward. To obtain the same smooth finish and detailing of the wing mold, you can only do that with a DLP / SLA resin printer and because you need a functional and strong plastic you will to use rather expensive/experimental color matching techniques. Well for that you need your own printer

  7. After much self debating, I decided to take over my finished ACSWS-1D model and to make the nose removable so it can be displayed with the 4 HMMs stored inside.

    My idea is to have the ACSWS-1D displayed with small HMMs launching from their chambers just like what I made for the TMM. Additionally it can also be used as a "reloading" display.

    sMWF_dio.jpg.2fee2a6414ba292ea7804897a65b5a75.jpg

    001_ACSWS-1D.jpg

    002_ACSWS-1D.jpg

    003_ACSWS-1D.jpg

    004_ACSWS-1D.jpg

    005_ACSWS-1D.jpg

    006_ACSWS-1D.jpg

    007_ACSWS-1D.jpg

  8. I have been looking and looking for a reference picture, and surprisingly if I presume that the mounting points are the same, my conclusions are that the ACSWS-1D will be a bit smaller than what I expected as a 4-Missiles carrier... It would be little shorter than the ACSWS-1A, and about the same size as a PACSWS-2G.

    What do you guys think of it ? Should it be a bit larger than the 1A version or smaller as described below ?

     

    size_comp.jpg

  9. I was wondering if you would mind making a unique model with sprues (I recommend at least 2.1mm diameter sprues, otherwise Shapeways would reject your model) for the Shoulders plates + fold Booster adapter (super pack ver) to reduce costs and also to avoid any confusion with the standard fold Booster adapter ?

     

×
×
  • Create New...