I don't think anyone here is trying to prove Keith wrong. I've gone thru the thread and tried to make sure that I had the argument correctly. Aside from the original post about how the Zentradi should have boycotted DYRL?. The question came up whether the movie within a movie concept was originally concieved at the time DYRL? was made. That's the argument right?
I don't really see the point of going in a thread as saying 'I have all the answers but if you guys want them, go find them yourself'. If that's the case, why even enter the discussion and make yourself sick with a buch of 'noobies'. It's cases like this that makes a simple question into fanboy banter.
bump ( P ) Pronunciation Key (bmp)
v. bumped, bumpĀ·ing, bumps
v. tr.
To strike or collide with.
To cause to knock against an obstacle.
To knock to a new position; shift:
To shake up and down; jolt:
The fact that someone has argued Macross longer than I have doesn't mean they have been watching it more or less than me.
If anyone else could do me the favor, and I have looked for myself, and show me where in the compendium it says that DYRL? was originally conceived as a movie within a movie, I would greatly appreciate.
Thank you...