Jump to content

tekering

Members
  • Posts

    4098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by tekering

  1. I can't agree with that. The model is beautifully lit, and proportionally very accurate to the original studio miniature. I love how, all these years later, it puts the whole V'Ger flyby sequence into perspective. Perhaps you were just disappointed by the creative decision to reveal the ship in its entirety, but concept art illustrates that was the original intent: It simply wasn't possible to complete the original 60-foot miniature in the limited time they had to finish the film. That I must agree with. ๐Ÿ˜” What's worse, you can clearly see stars pass through his face during the shot. ๐Ÿคจ That's doubtful. I'm sure the WoK release will be the same 35th anniversary "Director's Cut" Fathom released in 2017.
  2. That's totally absurd. ๐Ÿ™„ Even by the standards of pulp-fiction space fantasy, this fleet concentration is pants-on-head stupid, as nonsensical as anything from Rise of Skywalker. ๐Ÿคจ
  3. That may have been to the film's advantage, particularly concerning the inconsistent quality of effects work... This half-assed shot from The Director's Edition (above) actually looks worse than the 1979 original optical (below): You'll see the original matte painting matched the perspective of the live-action elements much better than the CGI shuttles in the new shot do. Look closely, and you'll also notice the ghostly after-image of extras not properly composited into the new shot: Most of the new shots looks better than this, but some are distractingly bad. Note how the actors have been digitally blurred to help matte them into the CGI background, since they painted out the original set wall behind them... except for that inexplicable beam that remains behind Kirk. ๐Ÿคจ I assume you guys are taking about diopter shots like this one, where the anamorphic lens was split with two different focal planes: Robert Wise and cinematographer Richard Kline were known for embracing this technique (particularly in The Andromeda Strain), and Quentin Tarantino has employed diopter shots in Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, and more recently The Hateful Eight. While most filmmakers try to hide the lines between focal planes, the Enterprise bridge set in particular made it very difficult to do so... resulting in somewhat distracting shots like this one.
  4. Yeah, that's X14, "Leah." She's just a little too large and ungainly to scale well with most of my "Legends" figures -- think MFT size, rather than Magic Square/Iron Factory size -- so I instead display her with other awkwardly-scaled figures that don't necessarily fit with their lines, either:
  5. My Scourge is a repainted MakeToys "Battle Tanker."
  6. I absolutely love the pilot compartments in the shells... although it's a shame the turtle pilots are facing backwards. ๐Ÿ˜‘
  7. A "love letter?" ๐Ÿคจ I thought it showed tremendous disrespect to the original series, not only because the script was full of references to episodes that never even existed, but more importantly because there was no attempt to disguise John Mulaney and Andy Samberg's voices. Chip 'n' Dale have used the same recording technique for over 75 years to give them their distinctive voices, yet they suddenly sound completely different here... and with absolutely no attempt to explain it, rationalize it, or address it whatsoever. ๐Ÿ˜’ And then there's the body horror suggested by Gadget having given birth to 42 half-insect, half-mammal offspring (not to mention the nauseating implication Gadget and Zipper had sexual intercourse)... ๐Ÿคฎ
  8. Yeah, but how the hell are you gonna paint 'em? ๐Ÿ˜…
  9. Never in a million years would I have imagined I'd see Blaster in a Disney film...! ๐Ÿ˜ฎ
  10. I guess that explains the vertical orientation of the warp core, then... They're not even trying to pretend it's the same ship. ๐Ÿ™„
  11. Looks great by itself, but if it doesn't scale properly with all the other Legends-sized figures in my Iron Factory/Magic Square/MechFanToys/War in Pocket/NewAge collection (as many NewAge figures don't), I'll have no use for it. At this stage of the game, scale is everything.
  12. So, without revealing any spoilers for "Ghosts of Illyria," I want to question a statement Doctor M'Benga makes in the episode. He refers to the Enterprise as "the flagship of Starfleet," a distinction I only recall being applied to Picard's Galaxy-class Enterprise. If memory serves, there were fourteen identical Constitution-class ships in service during Pike's tenure (some of which continued to be in service even after Enterprise was destroyed), so it seems disingenuous at best to call Enterprise the flagship. Are we simply to assume this is another example of the writers not doing their homework?
  13. "Bust" and "breast" are not the same thing, Bandai. ๐Ÿ™„
  14. Most of us here were children of the '80s, having grown up with Robotech, Star Wars, Transformers, Ghostbusters, Alien, Predator, and Star Trek... ...and, given what has been done to every single one of these franchises in the 21st century... ...I think we all need a hug. ๐Ÿค•
  15. Oh, so the Masters are an empire now? That's an entirely new sociopolitical structure. Who's the Emperor?
  16. Okay, I never saw those. I stand corrected. (The War For Cybertron trilogy didn't have any human characters either, but I discounted it because of its incredibly low budget. It was produced so cheaply that they couldn't even afford real voice actors.) ๐Ÿ˜‘ That would've been a terrible idea, and I'm glad it was never attempted. The premise doesn't require returning human characters, and it would greatly strain credulity if they had returned... unless it was merely as consultants (like Ian Malcolm's cameo in Fallen Kingdom). It was bad enough the Alien franchise had to keep bringing back Ellen Ripley... ๐Ÿ™„
  17. Yes, but it's a marketing necessity if you're going to get studio funding. You can do anything you want in a comic book, but as soon as you're spending real money to produce a story, it's got to have mainstream appeal. That's why every Transformers film or TV series features a human male protagonist (despite the whole premise revolving around an alien civil war). You can even look to those rare examples where money was spent producing a film (or series) without a human protagonist -- The Dark Crystal, for instance -- and in every instance, they've been tremendous commercial failures. ๐Ÿ˜”
  18. No, footage from "The Cage" was already used as a flashback in "If Memory Serves," an episode of Discovery's second season (which I take it you missed). Pike's encounter with the Talosians happened five years before Strange New Worlds, during his first five-year mission.
  19. There certainly isn't... not even in Robotech. Apparently, this soldier's job was to kill robots. ๐Ÿคจ Robots used by his own army, no less... ๐Ÿคญ ๐Ÿ™„ That nonsensical nomenclature was probably Matchbox's doing. ๐Ÿ˜’
  20. Only because he was written that way. After Kirk's death in Into Darkness, he had to take over as the action hero. I'm not feeling it. Quinto-Spock had Leonard Nimoy to play off of, and it was easy to accept Quinto as a younger version of Prime Spock (at least in the first film)... Ethan Peck, on the other hand, is playing a character firmly established as Michael Burnham's little brother. ๐Ÿ˜’
  21. There are many, many better options available for eye decals. Start by re-sizing these images for 1:48 scale: The sculpts and detail work is remarkable at that scale, but the eyes are letting you down.
  22. "Expertly Photoshopped" is more like it... but not even expertly enough to fool me. ๐Ÿคจ Look closely, and you'll see all the telltale signs of photo manipulation.
×
×
  • Create New...