Jump to content

Noyhauser

Members
  • Posts

    1581
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Noyhauser

  1. Couple of questions: Are you thinning it at all? Tamiya paints tend not to need too much thinner. Also make sure that shake and stir the paint well from the paint pot before you use it. It tends to separate and the paint accumulates at the bottom. By the way, are you building the Tamiya corsair? Its an absolutely gorgeous kit (I'm building one right now too)
  2. Tamiya paints need Tamiya thinner; the paint has a specific formulation which the thinner is designed for (Specifically the drying retarder glycol.) Depending on your airbrush, it shouldn't be milky either; thats usually what I use as a mist coast. I don't have a specific ratio for it because the paint is pretty robust when going through the airbrush. Its more of an art than a science; I think it should be compared to the quality of the paint you get out of the bottle, maybe a little thinner.
  3. Sorry Bri, I was shooting a bit fast from the hip there and didn't fully read the links... you're probably right that it wouldn't work too well on larger models; I think the effect only works when there is other, "normal" paint around it to give it some contrast.
  4. I'm doing precisely this with alclad for my VF-11 build (and a RAAF Meteor) here. In addition I'm part of a NMF group build on Fine Scale modeler which has brought alot of different methods to the fore.
  5. painted and weathered or just glosscoated?
  6. I haven't seen the HBR kit but I really like the proportions of the Club M kit; It looks sleeker than the YF-19. If you can give it the same treatment as the VF-4 (and I have some ideas on what you can improve) then I think It could be a dynamite model.
  7. Excellent I can't wait to see two more VF-11 build ups... As for mine, I've been working on it slowly. Oh and for your interest Petar, I'm co-building it with a RAAF Gloster Meteor mk8.
  8. So I've started building my model. Its been a bit of a pain getting everything together. Its fragile enough that everything needs to be pinned, from the main assemblies down to the horizontal stabs. Its fit is a bit off too so its important to find what you feel is the best. I made the decision not to use the fast packs and keep it in the clean atmospheric configuration. I'm now doing assembly/painting. Since I'm using alclad I need to put down a black enamel base coat, which is what you see in these photos. Yet given the construction of engines, arms and fuselage, I had to paint the legs first so I can get them completely covered. Thats what you see. I chose a variation of a scheme of an aircraft I saw growing up. I didn't cover the legs up completely so there was a bit of spill over, but that can be easily buffed out.
  9. Noyhauser

    My VF-0S

    Looking good Thom... the panel lining is superb and really brings the details out for the eye to see. Also I like how you've cut parts off the runners but keeping some of the sprue for painting; I'm going to use that myself. I'm eager to see what you can come up with.
  10. Yeah, except for the fact that everything about that fast pack flies in the face of basic aerodynamics, specifically the concept of lift and drag.
  11. Destroid; thats a pretty looking F-14; your shading looks really well done as does the details. In particular the exhausts are brilliantly done. :thumbsup:
  12. DP9 published both an RPG and a Miniature version at the beginning (1st edition rule book had both actually.) What was kinda a neat thing was that user content was incorporated into the broader storyline, as the Universe had a pretty in-depth meta story. This continued until about 2005 when RPG was gradually phased out, and the company started focusing on the miniature rules... until last year with SJG obtaining the rights.
  13. Was that a Jager or a Hunter?
  14. Hey all I've busy over the summer trying to learn how to better airbrush... including the BF-109 I completed a couple of pages back I also built a Hawker Tempest V, Hawker Sea Hawk, and a Supermarine Seafang (I still need to complete a bit of weathering on that one though.) Next on the block is something a bit more macross related.
  15. According to Airbus they only have one engine and two gearbox types. They consider this an acceptable trade off considering the advantages they anticipate;
  16. In addition its quite possible that Dragon equipped squadrons were depleted and replaced by older fighters retrofitted with OTEC. Remember the mechanic's comment that most of the pilots are new and inexperienced due to losses; using older fighters was their only option to replace those losses. Or in the case of illustrious there just wasn't replacement airframes weren't available so they were forced to make due with upgraded versions of their present airframes. Only newer carriers like the Asuka were deployed with bleeding edge carriers like the VF-0. Second; the dragon was shown to be a land based fighter; Macross Zero was fought completely fought by Carrier forces (on the UN's side)
  17. Well a friend and I finished ODST off last night... it was pretty good, though nothing too amazing. The changes are an interesting wrinkle to the game, they make the game significantly harder. You can't just take on everything anymore, a bit of stealth and planning are key. Some of the weapons have changed in their power; the silenced SMG is a pretty versatile gun, pistol is the underrated star of the game (headshots on grunts are ridiculously simple with it) while the Needler got a much needed upgrade and is one of the better weapons again (especially against brutes, not so much against the top tier enemies.) Still my friend and I breezed through it in about seven hours on legendary with a fair bit of skulls on (Except Iron, though I doubt it would have been that much more of a challenge with it as we rarely died.) If you're a major or above in Halo3 it shouldn't be that difficult. Firefight is pretty good too; I doubt I'll be going back to playing Nazi Zombies on COD anymore.
  18. Actually I think it goes beyond that. Its more of a social gaming experience; It allows four people to play against each other competitively in the same room with a solid game experience, or even against a group of others online. Bungie built a game that has appeal to a wider array of casual gamers. Throughout college I played Halo with alot of my friends, few of which would play traditional FPSs. Stuff like Half Life or CS can't offer that in the same way, which is why I think Halo has a much greater popularity than other, more traditional FPS games.
  19. No there was a 'Canadian' RAF specific squadron (242) as well as a bonafide Royal Canadian Air Force Squadron (401) which was deployed from 1940. This does not include Canada's contribution to Coastal Command, FAA and Bomber command. While Canada made a large direct contribution, they also helped train over half of all Commonwealth pilots who served during the war through the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan.
  20. I wonder if stainless steel alclad might be able to give a similar finish; its pretty shiny
  21. Have you heard the deep growl of a RR Griffon on a Spitfire? Its not as harmonious but the growl is pretty awe inspiring...
  22. I absolutely agree, and I think its clever decision by Kawamori (which follows other post modernist pieces) that allows him to avoid having to defend his work from every nitpicker. Macross is what it is to the eye of beholder; don't like something you can just ignore it. Personally I can't stand the fact that the VF-0 can go underwater; guess what, I can ignore it. Instead of getting people wound up about continuity or canon, he can just concentrate on telling stories the way he wants. Thats the way it should be. Um, first things last; I'm almost certain his views on this have not changed at all given the Macross Frontier episode with the filming of the Macross Zero movie. Its a classic filming of a film interpretation, which is the same as what he was getting at with Macross 7. Second, Robotech was not a great trilogy. There are massive stylistic differences and there are nothing really linking the three works. Whats the overriding theme? Who are the connecting characters? At least the various iterations of the Macross series have a common theme, though its sometimes to its detriment (Macross Frontier being too much in common with SDF.) I like the technology aspect of macross universe; Its realistic given the level of technological development you would expect. Newer designs replace the older ones, and there is a logical technological progression from VF-1 to the VF-25.
  23. Can the C operate in that role? I completely discounted that. And India was probably the longest shot of them all, but the dynamics of the Indo-American relationship and India's regional environment makes a shift not out of the realm of possibility.
  24. Well Japan and Korea just introduced their "helicopter destroyers", with the Ise being commissioned in two years time. I'd be surprised if they didn't upgrade these vessels to carry JSFs in the next decade. The only reason why Japan hasn't was it was needlessly provocative and there was no suitable aircraft to equip them with until now. The Koreans may well do the same in response. The Indians bought the Admiral Gorshkov from the Russians a few years ago, and are planning to build the Vikraant class in the next decade. While they operate Russian aircraft, given the political drift between them and Moscow and the new level of political cooperation between them and Washington, its not outside the realm of possibility. Italy and Spain have formed an amphibious EU battlegroup and have organized their procurement to suit that task. The Italians design the Cavour with the JSF in mind, its doubtful they would commission a ship last year only to pull out now. The Spanish are about to launch the Juan Carlos I next year, and while its more of a helicopter carrier, it does have a ski-jump installed. Really the only country that might give up carriers is Thailand. It might not be able to buy the JSF, but it doesn't need an anti-sub carrier either.
  25. Its also doubtful it would be canned as there are just so many export opportunities. The Thai, Spanish, Italian, Indian and Japanese Navies all operate VTOL carriers and they need replacements for the Harrier over the next two decades. Thats not even including the British, which make 200 firm orders if not more.
×
×
  • Create New...