Jump to content

Vifam7

Members
  • Posts

    2404
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Vifam7

  1. If anyone's wondering here's someone's build with absolutely no painting, no panel lining, and no stickers/decal put on. http://usjma.net/c-board/c-board.cgi?cmd=o...=322;id=entame2 Lots of good photos.
  2. Looks like it'll mainly be made of ABS plastic. It says - painted ABS model. They better figure out a way to insert landing gears! No landing gears = no buy for me.
  3. Basically it says that the Super Packs are in development. but the big banner says "to be sold separately". However, in the second scan that Graham gave us, the text says Luca and Michelle's versions will come with the super packs included. The prototype in the HJ article contains the transformation system.
  4. Pretty much thinner in a pen. Works fantastically on Gundam marker paint. I think the thinner in it is formulated specifically for Gundam marker paint.
  5. Depends on which Gundam marker I use. If I use the one with the soft felt tip, all I need is a q-tip and a bit of water to make the q-tip damp. The paint in the felt tip one is acrylic based so it comes out easy with water. If I use the one with the hard tip, then I use my thumb, a plastic eraser, Gundam marker eraser pen, or a q-tip slightly damp with Tamiya X-20A thinner depending on how much excess I need to get off. I think the paint in the hard tip one is laquer based so it dries slowly and thus able to be rubbed out.
  6. The text says they're still working on the molds so it seems nothing is definite yet. The text also mentions that there are build errors on the test shot model and readers should take note of that. There's still 3 months to go so there's still time for fixes. To me, the December release date doesn't even seem definite/likely right now.
  7. Those legs should come out and bend a bit further in gerwalk mode according to this guy's build.
  8. Prototype. According to the text, it's photos of the Test Shot #1 with more test shot versions and fine tuning to come. It says that the molds are still being worked on... The text also mentions some of the diecast areas - ankle area, thigh, shoulder base, upper arms, and other areas requiring strength. Other info in the text - ball joint used in ankle and crotch area. Crotch-leg-thigh area will be able to spray outwards in gerwalk mode. Landing gears to be made out of metal with rubber tires and able to store inside.
  9. Maybe CCA is another work Tomino wants to re-edit/re-write as he did with Zeta.
  10. New releases from Hasegawa. Basically - a VF-22S with VF-124 "Moon Shooters" decals (Isn't VF-124, the "Gunfighters"? I guess it's Moonshooters in M7?) a VF-0C with VMF-203 "Hawks" decals VF-22S fans should be happy since IIRC the original release was limited edition. I think the VF-0C is something new unless it's a misprint and is actually the VF-0D.
  11. The October issue of Hobby Japan is already out . Was there any new information?
  12. Not sure. Bandai's announcement of the VF100s line takes a lot of excitement out of such an idea. Before, I would've been super excited about GN-U fighter. Now, I'm not sure I'd be interested in a non-scale fighter-only toy. Now, if Yamato were to release GN-U fighters in a scale - say 1:72 or 1:100, I'd be VERY interested. Such a toy would be (to me) the equivalent of buying a completed Hasgawa model yet having better durability and still having potential for customizing. While it may conflict with Bandai's products, a toy in fighter-mode only does have its advantages over a perfect transformation or parts-swapper toy. I'd also add that it should come with plenty of option parts (aka. boosters, armor, missiles). Maybe even a decal sheet which adds to the tampo'd markings.
  13. How about a new Macross series in which the Valks are designed by someone other than Kawamori? Or better yet feature several different Valk designs each one by a different mech designer including Kawamori. Yes, I know that's blasphemy around these parts but I think it'd be interesting to see how different mech designers take on the variable fighter idea within the world of Macross. I've always enjoyed the different takes done to the "Gundam" - ranging from Katoki's minor touchups on the RX-78 to the radical Zeta (Fujita) and TurnA (Syd Mead) designs.
  14. Has anyone purchased the SPEC L-Gaim? It's already out. Too bad I can't afford it right now. (I have other priorities to buy right now) Gamu-toys has a review of it with lots of pics: http://gamu-toys.info/goukin/gouki/spec/spec06/spec06.html
  15. Okinawa! My father's from Okinawa. I love Okinawa and it's laid back atmosphere. Not to mention the weather. Lived there for a year back in '96-'97. Anyway to answer your question. Future Floor Wax is probably impossible to get. Maybe you might find it at a base PX if you can get inside. The last resort would be to import it via online. In Japan the standard acrylic clear coat is usually Gunze's Top Coat spray which is easily found at hobby shops. As for Micosol or Microset, the alternative in Japan is Gunze's Mr. Mark Softner and Mr. Mark Setter. I hope this helps.
  16. Obviously I'm confusing everyone's want for PT and my acceptance of parts-forming. Never should've wrote late at night. ^^;
  17. There's only one new information there that was not presented before. The hips move backwards and forwards, as well as move left to right. One interesting note in there - the writer said it was hard work in getting the double jointed knees and spreading out thighs to move correctly while having appropriate strength on the parts.
  18. It could also be like the old 1/72 Imai/Bandai kits in which you swap the entire forward fuselage. In other words you get 2 versions of the forward fuselage - one for fighter/gerwalk mode and one for battroid mode. This could conveniently solve the want for a long nose in fighter mode and a short nose in battloid mode. Not to mention doing away with big holes and ugly swing bars.
  19. From what I can read, it's a re-tooling of the SOC GX-31. Basically it just adds the tank-mode gimmick which is just a nod of head to the original Godaikin. A few new weapons are added as well. Probably not worth it for those who already have the prior GX-31 unless you must have tank mode capability.
  20. I wouldn't worry about pre-ordering. It may be in short supply in the first few weeks of its release but once the rush is over, you should have no trouble getting it. There has been no suggestion that this is going to be some kind of limited release so no worries.
  21. Well I think we're blowing things a bit out of proportion if we think these 1/100s are going to be Lego-like. And okay, maybe I was overstating things a bit with the Toynami toy. But I respectfully disagree that it MUST be PT. I certainly wouldn't mind it being PT. But if push comes to shove, if PT means I have to compromise on sculpt (esp. in fighter mode) - no thanks. I'd rather compromise PT than sculpt.
  22. Yeah, except Toynami's "perfect transformation" toy is crap. Crappy sculpt, crappy build quality, crappy durability, and gaps galore. The ancient 1/100 Takas were PT but again the sculpts were ugly. Both the Toynami and Taka have those ugly hip/leg joint things near the intakes that mar the looks in fighter mode. I hate those things.
  23. About the Aoshima version... it's a model kit. It says "injection kit", which to my knowledge can only mean plastic build-it-yourself. Now, I'm not sure if it means gluing, sanding, painting, and all that wonderful stuff or simply snapping the parts all together. For that price, it should come together without any work on my part.
  24. Um, I don't think I wrote anything like that. Did I? If I did, what article did I translate?
×
×
  • Create New...