Jump to content

Dynaman

Members
  • Posts

    4528
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dynaman

  1. Only problem is that the UK is a different region from the US where Blu-Ray is concerned. You would have to have a UK BR player or a multi-region one (if there is such a thing, I know there is for DVD).
  2. Was this season a dud? I've only had a chance to watch the first episode so far but I expected a lot more conversation about the show by now.
  3. I was going to say that after what they did to Minmay you would want them to try an entire idol group? But then I remembered the VA for Lancer is pretty good.
  4. Did they still lose the rights to the fighting kite and the name Macross? If yes then their stranglehold on Macross other then the original show is done. If not then well... Or was that only in the UK?
  5. If you have to say "not to get political" at the start of a post - you got political. And an entertainment movie says nothing for either side in that argument.
  6. I suggest going to the Disney parks and seeing how many minorities are appearing all over. To say that Disney is not making an effort to be inclusive throughout their business is just plain wrong.
  7. That kind of thing is just SOP for Movie and TV production...
  8. Anything involving the infringed IP would be illegal for them to show again. Barring some kind of deal with the owner.
  9. Nice enough I suppose but nothing beats the TV cars from the sixties. Batmobile, Both of the Monsters's cars, the Bevery Hillbillies truck...
  10. Yup, cause the guy on TV told us that is is impossible for any technology on Earth to make a crop circle. He also told me Aliens on high gravity planets will be tall and thin due to the gravity and that the aliens also have large black eyes due to the planet being very close to their sun.
  11. Better be the Yamato - it did have a small (minsicule) part to play in the battle while I don't think Musashi was completed yet. They did not spend much money - most of that footage is from the Pearl Harbor film a few years back.
  12. > Its worth pointing out that the term "Unidentified Flying Object" does not have to mean the same as "Flying Saucer" Just this kind of thing is what aggravates me the most about the UFO types - they are worse then a certain company saying they have full rights to "Robotech" when asked what rights they have to Macross - means just as much.
  13. I've personally seen a UFO. Just because I don't know what it was doesn't mean squat.
  14. I looked for a Honey I Shrunk the Kids thread to put this under but nothing obvious came up. It seems that the movie originally had a different title when being written (like most do) but in this case the network guy (Katzenberg in this case) hit the nail on the head... "I remember at the lunch, Katzenberg said, 'But we got to change the title. [Teeny Weenies] sounds like a low budget porn movie,'" Yuzna says. from https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/behind-the-scenes-of-honey-i-shrunk-the-kids-a-surprise-smash-horror-movie-for-kids
  15. Those changes might be near unrecognizable from the look of the ship though. Usually having to do with more AA guns and more reliable engines or internals or a slightly elongated hull.
  16. Just saw this on Netflix and I'm very glad I waited. At best I would give it an OK rating. The Princesses were a nice touch and some of the cameos but the main story was just boring.
  17. That was how it was SUPPOSED to look but Gene singed his OK on it upside down.
  18. > At first blush, it may appear that they're repeating a bunch of story lines from the previous films. But they change it just enough to make it interesting and different. Just like they did with films 2 and 3 then. I'm not knocking it. Film 3 was good and film 2 knocked it out of the park.
  19. To this day it is the only film that has done 3d right. Since it is still not possible for a TV to replicated the 3d as it needs to be Avatar was a theater only experience. Since the plot of Avatar was nothing special it makes seeing it in a theater for the spectacle the only selling point. Side note - Luckily this latest 3d fad seems to be sputtering out again. A couple years back it was near impossible to see an Imax movie in 2d, so far every one I have wanted to see this year was either 2d only or the option existed.
  20. 2 stores is hardly worth worth the time it took to write the article. A different format of store too - much smaller. This is TRU in name only, kinda like Atari when whoever bought it revised the brand name.
  21. > I'm just coming from the stance that not everything is inherently evil I just want to state that I do not equate "cash grab" with "evil". Grabbing Cash maybe but not a cash grab. I'm still going to re-up my annual pass to Disney (though I am on the plan that only went up 10% instead of 25%) so certain cash grabs I put up with while others I do not.
  22. There is a massive difference between rereleasing years later and a couple months later with "new" footage. Maybe I'm just old and remember second run theaters doing rereleases as a matter of course.
×
×
  • Create New...