Jump to content

Graham

Admin
  • Posts

    14390
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Graham

  1. Anybody know when the TomyTec Delta kits are coming out?
  2. I'm hoping against hope that it's like Bandai's old Star Trek kits, that had all the detail asks colour printed on. But for ¥500, my expectations are not high.....hahaha
  3. I know that's not the final "approved by Kawamori scheme" yet, but I'm really wondering if it is kinda generally representative of what the kit is gonna look like out of the box, or whether it is supposed to represent the kit after it's been painted up?
  4. I'll wait for the reviews before maybe picking up one of these. As the saying goes......."once bitten, twice shy". Graham
  5. That is so cool.
  6. Aren't they supposed to be airing a preview of episode 2, sometime in March?
  7. I'm still enjoying Rebels. My son and I typically watch it together each weekend. He grew up watching the Clone Wars cartoon, so it's great that Rebels is bring back some of the Clone Wars characters such as Ahsoka and Rex. We're kinda dreading an end of season finale confrontation between Ahsoka and Vader, in case Ahsoka dies.
  8. Heh, I can't even remember anything at all about the Spectre theme song. Nothing tops Skyfall for Bond theme songs IMO, so haunting
  9. Glad it at least won something, it was a fantastic movie.
  10. Interesting, so Ernest Johnson is not NUNS? I'd assumed from his uniform that he was part of the NUNS force (warships, VF-171s and Destroids) we saw in the prequel episode
  11. Whether it's canon or an alternate timeline is irrelevant to me. I love Macross II, always have, always will and love the VF-2SS design. However, I DO NOT love this toy. I so wanted it to be good, but to me it's just a big disappointment. Even battroid mode which as others have said locks together much better than fighter mode has issues. IMO, I basically consider it a fixed pose statue, as as soon as you start to pose the hips, the hip bar connection starts to unlock, as sometimes do the to small tabs connecting the back and chest plate. And as soon as you start to pose the shoulders or upper arms, the shoulder tabs want to come unpegged as well . And lets not get started on trying to get the battroid to actually securely hold the gunpod.........Grrrr. It's sad, because with just a few small changes, this toy could have been awesome.
  12. ET 1/60 VF-2SS. One word "disappointing" . But not unexpectedly so Graham
  13. OK, I've decided as much as I love the VF-2SS with SAP design, I am NOT going to pre-order the Evolution Toys version. If once it's out I hear there have been significant improvements in the fighter mode locking mechanisms, then I may reconsider my decision to purchase one. As it is though, the toy is just not fun enough and too frustrating. The added weight of the SAP would likely only exacerbate this. Graham
  14. OK, so I took my VF-2SS home last night, unboxed it and did one transformation from fighter to battroid, skipping Gerwalk, as I'm not a Gerwalk guy. My initial thoughts................... As others have said the plastic feels cheap (but isn't), but it is thin in many areas and does feel a but flimsy in places. The glossy fold out instruction sheet with color photos is nice, however, I did have trouble trying to figure out what some of the pictures were trying to show espeially for some steps for the torso, neck and backpack transformation. So I just ended up winging it for some steps..........haha. I'm sure If I could read the Japanese text it would be perfectly clear. So I'm primarily a fighter mode guy and I wanted this toy to at least hold together well in fighter mode. I'd already accepted long ago from the various photos online that it would only look good in fighter mode from certain angles. But the frustration factor with fighter mode was just too high. getting the arms and legs to stay tabbed in in fighter mode for any length of time when holding and swooshing the toy is an exercise in frustation. The right side leg on mine especially didn't want to stay tabbed in for more than a few seconds, so I gave up on fighter mode and went straight to the battroid transformation, as that's the mode that others on this thread have said locks together the best. Now for me, although I like as my toys to be as accurate to the line-art as possible, I'm not overly hung up about it, as long as the toy has a high fun-factor. That is the fun of handling, swooshing, posing and trasforming the toy should far outway any frustration factor caused by a difficult transformation, or a toy that doesn't lock together well, or is a floppy mess, or one that breaks easily. With the fighter mode, the frustration factor way outweighed any fun factor. Anyway, it took about 20 minutes to get it transformed from Fighter to Battroid mode as I went slowy and some areas like getting the neck panel swung out took a while as I thought I was gonna break it at one point........haha. So yeah, as others have said it locks together better in battoid mode, but leg pose-ability is a bit resctricted if you keep everything locked together. I'm also not sure how well some of the small tabs in this will survive multiple transfomations. Also, some parts do still unlock with handling (the rubber piece that pegs the two diecast swing bars together, which IMO is a strange choice for a locking mechanism), unpegs fairly easily when you re-pose the legs. So overall, this is a fair, but ultimately frustrating effort for a small company's first attempt at a perfect transformation VF toy, especially a Valk with a tricky transformation system like the VF-2SS. I'd give it a 1.5 out of 5 score for Fighter mode and a 3.2 out of 5 score for Battroid mode. With just a few small changes, such as better locking tabs, a gunpod that actually fit in the hand properly etc, I would have given it a highter score. As it is this is going straight in the display cabinet and likely won't get handled much due to the frustration factor. It's a shame, because I do love the VF-2SS and have wanted a transforming toy since 1992. Graham
  15. Haha.......yeah, I also have no idea what all these Transformer toys are people keep talking about, as the only mecha I collect is Macross.
  16. I'm past my buying multiples of anything phase, but I'll definitely be buying one each of the Fighter and Battroid modes of the VF-31S/F/E/A. Graham
  17. Yeah, I'm looking forward to these a lot. Graham
  18. I've had a few Bandai and Banpresto toys made of white plastic over the years that have seriously yellowed in the box without ever being put on display. Guess it just depends on which plastic is used by whatever factory they contract with at the time.
  19. Waiting for more pics of their VF-31 line. Really bored of the VF-1
  20. No, Yamato were not blocked from the MII licence, they just didn't want it. The CEO always thought that MII was not popular enough and the toys wouldn't sell. Also, I was told repeatedly each time I bought up the subject of MII toys that they were worried that it might annoy Kawamori if they made MII toys. Whether this is true or not, I don't know, but it is what I was told several times. Graham
  21. Excellent video review Veef. No need for me to do one now, nothing to add.....haha. Graham
  22. Cool, look forward to watching.
  23. Ha, last time was for the Yamato 1/60 YF-19 IIRC. But yeah, planning to do one for this. Graham
  24. Just received mine from HLJ at my office. Can't really play with it here though as gotta work But I did briefly take it out of the box for a minute. Initial comments: 1) It's bigger than I thought it would be. I've always thought the VF-2SS was quite a small Valk, so the size suprized me. 2) Plastic does look cheap. 3) Not much detail or panel lines, but that's not really Evolution's fault, the original lineart doesn't have a great deal of detail either. 4) Box art is pretty spiffy. More comments later after I have time to actually handle and transform it.
×
×
  • Create New...