Jump to content

Graham

Admin
  • Posts

    14391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Graham

  1. Me wants. I wonder if these become widely available, will it hurt the sales of the Toynami MPC Alpha? Perhaps it would make Toynami rethink their ridiculous retail price? Graham
  2. Damn, I'd buy a large Gakken Legioss for US$50 even if it is a bootleg. Did they have the greenies or only blue ones? Graham
  3. I've done a lot of reading on the Eurofighter, it's one of my favorite modern military aircraft. On paper it looks amazing, especially in it's full-up Tranche 3 configuration with all the bells and whistles fitted. IMO it's the best multi-role fighter in the world, except for the F/A-22, well on paper anyway. It's certainly capable of running rings around older jets like the F-15 and has indeed done so in training exercises by all accounts. However, like most modern planes it is a very complicated peice of machinery and software and due to a certain lack of both political and financial report at home, it's never really had the full support it deserves. It would be a real shame for it to be scrapped as once the bugs are worked out it would be an immensly capable aircraft. Graham
  4. While this Alex Ross guy is obviously a talented artist, when I see that golden age picture, only one thing springs immediately to mind. Let's all sing along now guys............... We're men... we're men in tights We roam around the forest looking for fights. We're men... we're men in tights. We rob from the rich and give to the poor, that's right. We may look like sissys, but watch what you say or else we'll put out your lights. (bang) We're men... we're men in tights always on guard defending the peoples rights. (Can can music) la la la la la la la la la, la la la la la la la la la... lalalalalalala (repeat). We're men..manly men We're men in tights, yes (with lisp) We roam around the forest looking for fights. We're men, we're men in tights We rob from the rich and give to the poor that's right. We may look like pansies, but don't get us wrong or else we'll put out your lights. (bang) We're men... we're men in tights (tight tights) Always on guard defending the peoples rights When your in a fix just call for the men in tights. We're butch. Graham
  5. I guess if you know you are facing an enemy that can remotely hack into your aircraft's systems, all you have to do is shut down your external datalink. This means you wont be able to share data with other aircraft and assests, but at least you won't be hacked. Graham
  6. Looks like the US Navy is heading that way already. Graham
  7. Graham

    VF-0D

    The Macross Compendium mentions the 2 seater VF-0A, but has no mention of the VF-0B. However, the VF-0 page on the Compendium hasn't been updated for ages, so I'm guessing that the information may be slightly out of date and what was originally called a '2-seater VF-0A' has now been renamed VF-0B. Graham
  8. Graham

    VF-0D

    So far, the VF-0B has not be shown in Macross Zero. Actually, that's not entirely true, what may be a tan color VF-0B may have been visable for a few seconds on the flight deck or hanger in episode # 1. I'll have to re-watch that episode again. Graham
  9. Graham

    VF-0D

    See this thread for a custom conversion. Graham
  10. Pretty damn rare Graham
  11. Ahem.....MW main page, links section has a link to the IHP page. Or just go here. And yes, I'd love to see Yamato make a VF-17 as long as it was 1/48 scale and perfect variable. None of this 1/100 scale PVC parts swapping nonsense (VF-0S cough, cough) thank you very much. Heck, I'm still waiting for my Bandai DX 1/65 scale Milia type VF-17S toy that was shown in the August 1995 issue of B-Club magazine. Graham
  12. The main differences between the DYRL FAST Packs and the TV FAST Packs are that the TV arm FAST Packs are slightly shorter and have a slanted front section and the TV packs are a slightly diferent color. Also, the TV FAST Packs do not come with the DYRL Double Strike Cannon. Graham
  13. Call me silly, but I quite like vs debates as long as they stay civil. Anyway, I'm not that familiar with the Mave as I've only seen the first two episodes of Yukikaze. I've been trying to search online for some specifications on weapons loadout, engine thrust, weight etc, so we can make a more meaningful comparison, but so far I have not been able to find any technical information online on the aircraft of Yukikaze. Regarding the original Super Sylph Yukikaze, which I'm slightly more familiar with, it would seem that as far as weapons load, the VF-0 would have the edge. I've definitely seen written somewhere that the Super Sylph is fitted with a 20mm M61A1 Vulcan cannon, whereas the VF-0 has the far more powerful GPU-9 35mm gunpod as well as either 1 head laser (VF-0A/B/D) or two head lasers (VF-0S). Also, IIRC, the Super Sylph and AFAIK the Mave are only shown carrying a total of 4 missiles, although they do look like they would be fairly powerful and long range due to their large size. However, the VF-0 series carries as standard 12 medium range missiles on the wings as well as 48 short range micro-missiles in the leg-mounted FAST packs. Regarding defensive systems, I've honestly no idea about the capabilities of the aircraft of Yukizaze. However, the VF-0 series has an impressive defensive suite including the AN/ALE 55 flare and chaff dispenser system. The AN/ALQ 220A IDECM. ASS/PS 110 active stealth system. AWAG/RA 105 SW-AG energy converting armor system (info courtesy of Macross Compendium). Without any specs for the Mave or Super Slylph, it's difficult to compare speed and acceleration. Regarding agility, the Super Sylph is a huge aircraft, so I find it difficult to believe it would be as agile as the smaller VF-0, even though both aircraft have thrust vectoring. I would think that the three mode transformation ability of the VF-0 would give it an edge though. Perhaps David could comment? Graham
  14. I'd go with the compressed air theory. Nice to know we have other Vf-17 Nightmare lovers on this board Graham
  15. Graham

    1/60 Gbp

    Yesterday I bought one piece each of both the VF-1J with GBP and the separate GPB armor set. As I had a lot of baby stuff to carry home yesterday, I was only able to carry the armor set home last night and I left the GBP with VF-1J at the office. Anyway, last night I fitted the armor set to my Hikaru VF-1J Super and here's a very quick review (and a short rant) about the 1/60 GBP armor set, without pictures. The armor set (without valk) comes packed in a nice green box. The style sort of reminds me of the old Takatoku GBP box, although of course the Yamato box isn't made of the nice textured card of the old Takatoku boxes. At least the Yamato box is nice and compact, which should save on shipping costs for those of you ordering the toy from overseas. Hopefully Yamato have learnt their lesson after all the complaints about the unnecessarily large (supersize ) VT-1 and VE-1 boxes. On first impressions, the GBP gives one the feeling of being a quality product. IMO it looks nicely sculpted, the plastic quality is qood and it has a nice paint finish. Also, the armor attaches easily to the Valk and stays on well, with one noteable exception (see point # 2 of my rant below). The GPB features opening missile hatches on the chest, shoulders and sides and rear of the lower leg armor. None of the missiles are removeable. The toy comes with a small sticker sheet, including stickers to mark your armor as either number '1, 2, 3 or 4'. An instruction manual containing black and white photos and a set of the ultra-large TV type fists are also included. Now for the rant. I have three main complaints about this toy: - 1) As somebody else already mentioned, when the hip and groin armor is attached, the Valk hip pegs are not really long enough to engage fully into the valks nosecone holes and the legs have an annoying tendency to fall out of the nosecone holes every time the toy is picked up or moved. On my VF-1J, the legs fall off so frequently, that I am seriously consdering gluing the hip pegs into the nosecone (thus rendering the toy non-transformable). This problem really kills any playability and effectively leaves the toy as a fixed pose statue as it cannot be moved without a leg falling off 2) As I mentioned above, the armor attaches firmly and will not fall off, except for one piece, which is the front groin armor. The groin armor consists of two pieces, a front and rear, which covers the Valks nosecone. The front groin armor connects to the rear groin armor via 4 small pins which plug into holes in the rear groin armor. Unfortunately, these pins are both too short and too narrow to have much purchase and as a result, the front groin armor pops off with alarming regularity, i.e. just about every time the toy is picked up or moved. Grrrrrrrr! Again, I am seriously considering gluing the two halves of the groin armor together, which would mean I end up with a permanently armored non-transforming Valk 3) The TV type fists are way too big. I mean we are talking 1/48 size. Obviously, Yamato was trying to capture the look of the old Takani box art from the Imai and Arii model kits, but they have definitely over-compensated for something . IMO, it would have been much better if Yamato had sized the TV fists about a third to half smalller than the current size. Also, with the large clown fists, the Valk cannot hold a gunpod. I tried the large fists, but IMO they are just too large and look too ridiculous, so I am using the original 1/60 Valk hands instead, so that my armored VF-1J can hold his gunpod. So overall, I'd have to say that the product is flawed. It makes a great-looking display peice, but the problems with the legs and groin armor take away any playability and greatly reduce the fun-factor. I'd give this a 6.5 out of 10. Graham
  16. Graham

    hong kong

    A quick use of the search function reveals the following helpful thread: http://www.macrossworld.com/mwf/index.php?...69&hl=hong+kong Graham
  17. Graham

    1/60 Gbp

    Hmm....in that case, I might try to glue the hips permanently in battroid mode on one of my 1/60 VF-1J, to make it a dedicated Armored Battroid. I really hope that Yamato has a 1/48 version in the works. Graham
  18. Graham

    1/60 Gbp

    Thanks guys. I'll be sure to post pics. BTW, has anybody tried to see if the big fists that come with the GBP will fit on the 1/48 as they look about the right size. Graham
  19. amen. I'd also make a plea to the moderators to possibly close this topic before it gets any further out of hand The problem is, as soon as we close one 'let's bash Macross 7' topic, another one springs up almost immediately to take it's place and the whoe cycle starts all over again. Graham
  20. Yep, that proves it's an FAE bomb I reckon. Based on the pics in Nanashi's above post, that's pretty much identical to the bomb in ep # 4. Graham
  21. Graham

    1/60 Gbp

    Just got my GBP armor set and GBP with Valk at lunch (thanks Neova). No time to play with them yet as I'm still at work, but I did take the armor set out of the box to have a quick look and it's pretty nice. I'll try and do a review, but no promises, as my son is due to be born in the next 5 days, so as you can imagine I have other things on my mind rather than toy reviews. Graham
  22. I can't recall the last time (if ever) that I used the term 'Oriental'. To me it sounds outdated & antiquated like it belongs in a turn of the century costume drama Usually, I'll just refer to Japanese, Chinese, Thais, Koreans, Philipinos etc as Asians or by their respective nationality. If people ask me what is my wife's nationallity, I say she is Hong Kong Chinese. As someone mentioned back on page 1 of this thread, in UK it is common to refer to Indians and Pakistanis as Asians, but I personally find this a bit weird as in my mind I don't link people from that part of the world as being 'Asian', so I'd refer to them by nationality instead. Graham
  23. Not really MPC related, but it has to do with Toynami, so I thought I'd post it here. Anyway, I was in my local Jusco department store yesterday (a Japanese department store chain in HK) and I noticed they were selling Toynami Mospeada Legios Superposeables. That's right, Mospeada, not Robotech. The style of the packing was very similar to the US versions, but Robotech was not mentioned anywhere on the packing, instead it clearly said Mospeada on the box front. The toy looked identical to the US version and was selling for HK$89 (US$11.50). I didn't buy one though. Although a Japanese release of the Alpha MPC has been announced a long time ago, this is the first I've head of an Asian version of the Alpha superposeables. Graham
  24. You say that like it's a bad thing Graham
  25. I didn't vote as there was no choice that fit me. I would probably buy an HG DYRL and M7 DVD only if they were subbed and the character names, BGM and songs remained completely unchanged. Also, they must be titled as 'Macross' products, not branded 'Robotech'. I own the following original Japanese R2 DVDs: - Macross Plus vol. 1-4. Macross Zero vol. 1-4. DYRL FB 2012 I own the following original R1 DVDs and VHS: - Macross Plus vol. 1-4 (DVD & VHS) Macross Plus Movie (DVD) Macross II vol 1-6 (DVD & VHS). SDF Macross (AnimEgo DVD). I own the following DVD boots and fansub VHS: - Macross 7 (DVD boot and fansub VHS). Dynamite 7 (DVD boot & fansub VHS). DYRL (DVD boot & fansub VHS). Macross Zero 1-3 (DVD Boot). Graham
×
×
  • Create New...