Jump to content

Graham

Admin
  • Posts

    14391
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Graham

  1. The YF-21's two gunpods can be attached to the YF-21 in fighter mode either with or without the FAST packs fitted. Without FAST packs fitted, they are stored semi-recessed in the leg bay cover panels (belly plates) in fighter mode. This can be clearly seen in the line-art circled '94.5' in the middle right panel on page 88 of the Shoji Kawamori Macross Design Works book. Also, both the 1/144 scale Doyusha YF-21 toy and the 1/72 scale Hasegawa YF-21 model kit have the gunpods correctly semi-recessed into the belly plates. Interestingly, neither of the two TIAS Macross Plus books feature that particular piece of line-art, which has led some people to the incorrect assumptions that either the YF-21 fighter could only carry the gunpods when the FAST packs are attached or that without FAST packs fitted, the two gunpods are stored completely internally inside the belly plates (an assumption I wrongly held until fairly recently). In episode # 1 of the Macross Plus OVA, the YF-21 does not have the gunpods fitted, which is why Guld uses the wrist lasers to shoot down the drones. However, if you look closely at the YF-21 in episode # 2 during the aerial gunnery scene, you can see the gunpods semi-recessed into the YF-21's belly plates in fighter mode. As the line-art of the YF-21 fighter mode without FAST packs but with gunpods fitted was not published until the end of 2001 in Design Works, I'm thinking this is probably why Yamato's original YF-21 toy which came out in 2000 did not have gunpods, as Yamato may have only had access to or seen the more common line-art, which shows the non-FP YF-21 Fighter with no gunpods. Graham
  2. Although I'm more of a Glock 21 fan (had 10,000rds through mine with no failures to feed or fire), I also love the Glock 20, although none of the gun dealers stock 10mm ammo here in HK, so on the rare occasions when I still do shoot, there's no way to shoot 10mm On one overseas trip I did once have a chance to shoot steel falling plates at 100m with a Glock 20. Fantastic gun and very flat shooting at that range. For hunting with the Glock 20, I'd recommend the factory optional 6" barrel, which should probably add a couple hundred fps velocity. And Glocks are NOT butt ugly. They are beautiful guns. Graham (Glock dealer & Glock armorer since 1996)
  3. In the the S&W .500 Magnum, I far prefer the shorter barreled version. Should be much easier to carry when hiking or trekking and by all accounts it's a real blast to shoot (pun intended). Graham
  4. Glad you and your wife are ok and your 1/48 collection was unharmed Just as others in this thread have said, you did take a big risk as the kid could well have been armed and you could have ended up shot or stabbed....not good. Luckily this time it had a happy ending. Personally, I'd recommended buying a quality home defence firearm and make sure you get the training how to use it and practice as well (very important). If you are unlucky enough to have another buglar, the safest plan is to barricade (lock) yourself and your wife in your bedroom, which should be fitted with a reinforced door and call the cops from there. Of course the bedroom should have it's own phone line. The firearm is basically for defending yourself only if the badguys are breaking down your bedroom door, not for going out to hunt them down with. It's never a good idea trying to confront buglars or home invaders and no personal property is worth risking your life over, not even a Low Vis 1/48 If your are uncomfortable with firearms in the home for whatever reason, invest in some OC Pepper Spray or a few strategically placed baseball bats around the house is probably better then nothing. Graham
  5. That's a great idea for a stand, but personally, I think I'd be too scared to go drilling holes in my Hasegawas, especially after I paid so much to have them painted . Graham
  6. I hope Yamato are not giving up on Macross, but to be honest, there doesn't seem to be many new products on the horizon and I'm pretty sure the YF-19FP and non-transforming Destroid Monster are now vapourware There is still so much stuff Yamato could do. Personally, I think that is this year is the 10th anniversery of Macross 7, it would be a good chance to release some high detailed, accurately proportioned, perfect transformation Mac 7 toys. I'd definitely buy multiples of the following toys if Yamato made them: - Macross 7 Toys, either 1/55, 1/60 or 1/48 scale (1/72 is too small) VF-22S Max Colors VF-22S Milia Colors VF-22S Gamlin colors (D7) VF-19Kai w/Sound Booster VF-19S w/FAST Packs VF-19F w/FAST Packs VF-19P (D7) VF-17S w/FAST Packs VF-17D with optional Radome VF-17S Milia colors VF-17TKai w/Sound Booster VF-11C w/Space FAST Packs VF-11C w/Atmospheric FAST Packs (from Nightmarish Invasion) VF-11C Full Armour VF-11D w/Sound Booster FAST Packs Fz109F Fz-109A I deliberately didn't include Mylene's VF-11MAXL Kai on the above list as there is only one version of it that Yamato could release, so they would probably loose money on the tooling. However, all the other toys; VF-11, VF-19, VF-17 & VF-22 have multiple versions which could be released, mostly just involving a head and color change and some minor resulpting, thus making it more likely that Yamato could recoup their costs and turn a profit. Of course a VF-11 and VF-22 toys should be all new resculpts and not based on the existing Macross Plus toys. Of course there is so much other Macross stuff that I'm convinced would sell if only Yamato made them with decent sculpts, such as Mac Plus resculpts, Mac Zero Perfect Transformation toys, M3 mecha to name but a few. Graham
  7. I think both the 1/100 VB-6 Konig Monster and 1/100 VF-0S are presently scheduled for end of the year, although I wouldn't be surprised if that slips again to 1st quarter 2005 Graham
  8. Unfortunately, I suspect that is probably true With no new Yamato Macross products slated for release until the end of the year, except the Max Q-Rau and CM's Milia figures, it looks like Macross toy fans are in for a boring 2nd half of 2004 Graham
  9. So little, I'm surprised. I would have thought the Phalanx would have a huge magazine capacity, compared to when the Vulcan gun is installed in a fighter jet, given that there should be far less space restictions on a battleship compared with sticking the same gun in a fighter. If it's not classified, can you tell me what is the magazine capacity of the Phalanx and how many rounds on average are fired in a single burst? Graham
  10. If you want something more sturdy, but which still looks great, I'd recommend buying a toy like the Yamato 1/48 VF-1 instead. Hasegawas are supposed to be traditional (fragile) model kits, not the half-toy half-models that the Bandai Gundam kits are. Although I'm not a model builder, I recently comissioned a pro-painter to build me 3 Hasegawa kits (VF-22S, VF-0S and SV-51 Nora), all built wheels up as if flight and I'm absolutely blown alway by them. I can't believe how big the SV-51 is, it's a monster. Graham
  11. Er...what's RAM? I presume you are talking about some sort of launcher and not Radar Absorbent Material? And what's a NATO Launcher? Something for getting rid of those pesk NATO allies when they don't agree with US policy? Sort of like one of those cannons they use at the circus for shooting out the human cannon ball.......simply load in any NATO ally that is being troublesome and fire him overboard Sorry for the ignorance, but I'm not as up on ship defensive systems as I am on aircraft and smallarms. Graham
  12. Heh, I bet the environmentalists get their panties in a twist about the DU rounds poisoning the little fishes Graham
  13. Probably because claws make more effective weapons than hands for punching and grappling with Invid mecha. Graam
  14. Spike died? As good an anime as Cowboy Bebop is, I guess it can't really have made a lasting impression on me, as I don't remember Spike dying at all, and the last time I watched the series and movie was only about a year ago Most surprising death is a tie between Kircheis and Yang in LoGH. I really didn't see either of them coming. Saddest death goes to another LoGH character, Walter Von Schenkopp. He was my favorite character in the series and I really wanted to see him live, but he buys it in a really stupid and avoidable way, i.e the moral of his death is always make sure your enemies are reallly dead and don't turn your back on them! Another sad death is the pilot in Nadesco, sorry can't remember his name (Gai?) who is killed early on in the series. Graham
  15. Nanishi will know, but IIRC it's a chaff and flare launcher. Graham
  16. Knight26, just curious, how many Phalanx guns does a US carrier have? Doesn't seem like many from the pics maybe 2? I sure miss the warships of WWII that were bristling with guns from every nuck and cranny. I would have thought that something as valuable as a carrier would have at least 6 to 8 Phalanx with interlocking fields of fire in case of a malfunctioning or damaged gun. I suppose like anything budget plays a part in the number and type of defensive systems as well. Also, are any US Navy ships using the 30mm Goalkeeper system? Seems to be a better alternative to Phalanx, with heavier, long range shells = better at knocking missiles/planes out of the air at longer range. I did read once that the Phalanx fires solid shells rather than HE, as a solid shell may actually swat a missile out of the air or divert it's course enough to miss the target, whereas a proximity detonating HE round may only damage the missile, but not actually stop the missile or remaining parts of the missile travelling forward on momentum and still reaching the target. Is this true? Graham
  17. I'd also love to see a 1/48 VT-1 and also a VE-1, then I could finally put all my 1/60 toys into storage. However a long time ago Yamato indicated that they probably would not make 2-seat 1/48 toys. There is a lot of retooling that needs doing for the VT-1. Not only do you need to sculpt all new FAST packs, but the nose section, wings and head all need resculpting and new tooling which is very expensive. Graham
  18. Well, it's still fairly easy to find the 1/48 Max & Milia VF-1J Super here in Hong Kong. The FAST Pack sets are also easy to find. I think I've seen some VF-1S Hikaru and VF-1J Hikau Super in a few shops as well, but all the other 1/48s are pretty much sold out. Graham
  19. Given the cost of the average nuclear powered aircraft carrier, I'm sure the US Government & US Navy would rather take the heat about accidently turning a few civilians into shark food rather than losing one of their very expensive ships, not to mention all the sailors, airmen and aircraft aboard. Graham
  20. Provided that it is indeed terrorist suicide bombers and not some poor slob who don't understand Engrish. Turning innocent folks into shark food always have reprucsussions. One would think that in this day and age, it's pretty much common sense that it's not good for ones health to approach too closely to an American warship unless you have clearance to do so. And anyway, there's such a thing as escalation of force: - Step # 1: If they're approaching slowly, hail them first. Step # 2: If hailing doesn't work fire a warning shot across the bows. Step # 3: If they're still coming, they're probably up to no good anyway and force is justified. Of course, if they are approaching at high speed on a rammming course, forget steps # 1 & 2 and go directly to step # 3 Graham
  21. Ya know, this thread reminds me about the conversion between the US Aircraft Carrier and the Canadian authorities (actually an urban myth and untrue but still funny). Read below: - Purported transcript of a US naval ship with Canadian authorities off the coast of Newfoundland in October, 1995: Americans: "Please divert your course 15 degrees to the North to avoid a collision." Canadians: "Recommend you divert YOUR course 15 degrees to the South to avoid a collision." Americans: "This is the captain of a US Navy ship. I say again, divert YOUR course." Canadians: "No, I say again, you divert YOUR course." Americans: "THIS IS THE AIRCRAFT CARRIER USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN, THE SECOND LARGEST SHIP IN THE UNITED STATES' ATLANTIC FLEET. WE ARE ACCOMPANIED BY THREE DESTROYERS, THREE CRUISERS AND NUMEROUS SUPPORT VESSELS. I DEMAND THAT YOU CHANGE YOUR COURSE 15 DEGREES NORTH. THAT'S ONE-FIVE DEGREES NORTH, OR COUNTER MEASURES WILL BE UNDERTAKEN TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF THIS SHIP." Canadians: "This is a lighthouse. Your call." Graham
  22. Why evil? I'd have thought that a stream of 20mm shells at 6,000 rounds per minute, would be a pretty effective way of stopping a small craft filled with terrorist suicide bombers who were intent on blowing up your aircraft carrier from getting too close. Graham
  23. From what I understand, Nishikawa-san was/is freelance and actually works for a company called Flex Co. He was never an actual fulltime employee of Yamato. I think he was hired specifically for the 1/48 project only. AFAIK, most Japanese toy companies, even giants like Bandai do not usually employ full time in-house sculptors. If my understanding of the situation is correct, most toy sculptors/designers in Japan are either freelance or work for smaller production companies and are hired out by the big toy companies on a per-project basis. I think the more famous designers like Nishikawa-san and the guys who do the MG/PG models and SOC toys are often booked years in advance and are in such high demand that they can to some extent pick and chose which projects they want to work on. Graham
  24. Where is the gun supposed to go on the Shadow in fighter mode? Graham
  25. While it's true that the overall design of the VF-0 is very similar to the VF-1 (minor cosmetic styling differences only), the same is not true of most other Macross Variable Fighters. The point I was trying to make is that 99% of most Gundams follow a very similar design philosophy, e.g. near identical looking head/face with V antenna, very similar color scheme (white body with red, yellow and blue trim) and other similar design features, e.g twin chest vents, two beam sabres on back, very similar styling on arms, legs, body, skirt etc. By comparison, the different models of variable fighter look distinctly different IMO with very few design similarities. It is hard to confuse a VF-1 with a YF-19, YF-21, SV-51, VF-17, VF-11, VF-9, VF-14, VF-4, VF-5000, VA-3 etc. At least Kawamori makes each new type of Variable fighter different enough that there is little chance of confusing them, unlike Okawara, who should be called 'the king of recycling'. Yes, you can say that in Macross within a single VF model type, for example VF-1, there are only minor differences such as the head and color variations, but the same could be said of Gundam as well. A prime example being the original RX-78, where as well as the anime colors, you also have 'Roll out' colors, G3 colors, full armor color etc. Same exact design, different coloring only. And one of the many things I find unrealistic about Gundam animes is the preponderance of new mobile suits. Given the compexity of an MS, one would think that it would take years from the design stage to production and testing to get a new MS model into service. Not to mention there is probably a very high dollar value attached to producing an MS. However in the various Gundam universes, it seems that new models of MS are introduced nearly weekly. Sometimes, to be produced only in extremely small numbers, sometime even only one unit is built and then discarded a few weeks or months later as soon as the next 'Wonder' design is ready. If real world militaries went about procurement the way the Feddies and Zions (insert equivalent SEED names here) do, they would be bankrupt very shortly. This is another area where I think Macross scores in reality terms. In the Macross universe, Kawamori has the main model of VF in service for 10-20 years (just like the real world), before a new design comes into service. Gundam is probably better if you like 'mecha of the week' shows, but I think I'll stick to Macross as a better example of a more real militay mecha show Graham
×
×
  • Create New...