Jump to content

Graham

Admin
  • Posts

    14555
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Graham

  1. My thinking for this was as follows:- Firstly, although the Hasegawa fighter mode kits are fantastic, most of us don't have the skill, time or patience to do justice to them. Yet, many people here love fighter mode. I'm an absolute crap model builder and the only way for me to have some nicely painted Hasegawa fighters, is to get somebody to paint them for me, which is very expensive. Secondly, While the Yamato 1/60 PT toys are great, they are expensive and as mentioned, many us us just transform them a few times and then leave them in one mode. Also, some of them can be a little big to leave lying around on the desk and just casually pick up and fly around. Also, of course depending on the toy, there may be looking issues, which means you can't fly it around as much as you would like (1/48 with FPs, I'm talking about you)! A few people have commented about how beacuse of the Bandai VF100s line, they would not be interested in GNU fights. However, I'd just like to pooint out that the VF100s line is really pretty much an unknown quantity at this point. They may be great, or they may turn out to be horrible floppy messes, we don't know yet. I've really fallen in love with the GNU battroids and would like in scale fighters to match. Like most people here, I'm not too interested in a GNU VF-1 fighter, but I'd definitely but Macross Zero, Macross Plus, VFX-2 fighters. So to revise my original proposal, if these GNU fighters: - 1) Sell at a cheaper price point than the GNU battroids. 2) Have moveable swing wings. 3) Come with detachable wing missiles and FAST Packs. 4) Includes a display stand. 5) Have some removeable panels, e.g . engine nacelle covers. Would you buy them? PLease just a yes or no reply, aloong with any comments about what you would like to see in a FIGHTER. No comments about enemy mecha, destroids etc. This thread is not about those. Graham
  2. IMO, about the only animes where the mecha look great in GC are Macross Zero and Macross Frontier, but I may have a slight bias. Graham
  3. Definitely buying the VF-19A and white VF-11, they look great. Graham
  4. Finally saw the Roy, Max & Hikaru on sale in Animate yesterday, but decided to pass. While they where good toys back in the day, they don't really cut it anymore IMO. I may pick up one for my 4 year old though, as he is still too young for Yamatos. Graham
  5. With the 1/60 DX VF-25F/S, Bandai already have 90%+ common tooling to make Luca's RFV-25, so costs are minimal. For a VF-171, it means starting from scratch. Big expense. Graham
  6. Err....is this anything to do with Macross Frontier? Graham
  7. Guys, If Yamato were to make a non-transforming Fighter mode GN-U toy, how many of you would buy it? I've been extremely impressed by the scupt, quality and materials of the GN-U Macross Plus battroids and I'd love to see a GN-U fighter mode as well, that being my favorite mode. I think a GN-U fighter in scale with the battroids would by the perfect size for play and display. So assuming the following points, how many of you would be interested? Would come with a display stand. Would come with detachable landing gear to allow it to be posed either wheels down or flying with wheels up. Canopy would be clear, with a pilot figure inside, but may not open. Cost would be comparable to or slightly cheaper than GN-U battroids. Would use the same materials and have same high stand of finishing as GN-U battroids. Wings would move. Foot thrusters would also likely move (to simulate thrust vectoring). While the 1/200 VFC are nice, I'd prefer GN-U size and quality. Graham
  8. That's the plan, or so I've been told. Graham
  9. I certainly hope not. IMO, the Revoltingtech VF-1 toys are absolutely horrible looking. Graham
  10. Do you even need to ask? Of course the answer is yes. However, I reckon It's unlikely that Bandai will make one in 1/60 scale though. At least we are getting one in 1/100 scale. Hopefully Bandai will release all three variants: VF-171, RVF-171 and VF-171EX. Graham
  11. Not really, just a few words and simple sentences. Graham
  12. In the Frontier news section in the TV series forum, Kresphy just posted a link to the new Macross Ace Frontier commercial. mms://221.243.119.235/macross_acefrontier/pv2_1009_1m_df87.wmv The game looks even more awesome. And it's confirmed, you can customize the colors of your mecha! Graham
  13. I'm trying to get confirmation from Yamato about what (if anything), is happening. Whether anything is actually happening depends on who at Yamato Overdrive spoke to. If it was just some junior sales flunky, they may have just given Overdrive a line of sales BS. If however, it was the CEO or head of product development, that may be another story. Stay tuned. Graham
  14. And of course back in the day, Arii released a couple of plastic models of the Zentraedi cucumber ships. Graham
  15. While Bandai generally makes quite durable toys, they are not without their share of breakages also. Two breakage-prone Bandai toys that spring to mind are the hips on the first Soul of SPEC EVA and the extremely fragile shoulders on the New Material Model Turn A toy. Cross fingers the 1/60 DX VF-25 will be sturdy enough. Graham
  16. That 1/60 has obviously been eating a whole lotta pork chops then. (BTW, here in Hong Kong, 'Pork Chop', is slang for a fat ugly girl). Graham
  17. That's just a Test shot or painted resin sample in that pic, not the production version. The final production version will likely have tampo printed markings. We get this we every release. prototype pics turn up online showing the toy with stickers and people start complaining, then when the toy is released it has tampo printed markings. You guys should know the rountine after all these years! The only toy that Yamato really should have tampoed but didn't IMO was the Uran Camo 1/48 GBP. Graham
  18. No, no and no! As much as I love the original series, I don't want them to repeat what's been done before. IMO, there's no need to remake everything, just cus' it's a couple of decades old. Graham
  19. Sorry, I didn't quite catch that. So is it a toy, or a model? Graham
  20. No trust me, I would lose. I really, really suck at painting. Hey, perhaps we could run two contests, one for the pros like WM Cheng to see who can build the best model and one for people like us, to see who can do the crapiest build......LOL! Graham
  21. Agreed, but I'm still going to get one as a substitute toy, until the real toys come out. My craving for a VF-25 is too strong and I need my fix now man. Can't wait until December or January or whenever the damn 1/60 DX VF-25 Chunky is coming out. Graham
  22. Scan? Will try to pick up tomorrow. Hmm.....'Macross Begins'...........perhaps it will be a new TV series or OVA based on the 1999 to 2009 period, i.e. from when the ASS-1 crashes to the start of the orignal SDFM TV series. I'd still love a season 2 of Frontier though. Anway, unless Sketchley is pulling our collective legs about the writing on the back of the poster it sounds like Frontier was a big enough success that we may be getting some form of new Macross anime next year.....yippee! I do hope it's something set in the 2050s or beyond though. I'm personally not keen on retreading old ground with an origin story. Graham
  23. I usually use the terms 'TV games' (HK-English) or 'console games' for stuff like Playstation, X-Box etc. 'Handheld games' for PSP, gameboy etc 'Arcade games' for well, arcade games. And computer games for any game played on a computer. If you say 'video games' here in HK, most people would just look at you blankly. Graham
  24. Love that NT pic of Sheryl as Basara and Ranka as Minmay. Fantastic pic of the VF-171EX battroid as well. Graham
  25. While I haven't read a Marvel comic since my teens (except for Marvel Zombies), isn't Captain America supposed to be white, and Will Smith is err.......not? Mind you I've been wrong about the race thing before. I could have sworn that when I last read some Nick Fury stuff back in the 80s', he was a grizzled old white dude with an eyepatch, yet he was played by Samuel L. Jackson in the recent Iron Man movie. Not that there's anything wrong with using actors of a different race to portray a character, but I would have thought that most fans would have a reasonable expectation that a character be the same race in a movie adaptation as in the printed source material. Graham
×
×
  • Create New...