Jump to content

Graham

Admin
  • Posts

    14606
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Graham

  1. 1/48 definitely has more presence, but as I'm only displaying Macross toys and nothing else, I like to have all VFs in the same scale. Graham
  2. No, the locking gear was actually in the strut. Graham
  3. Better pics on page 20 of the 2 seater thread. Seriously dude, it's not that hard to search for them yourself. Graham
  4. Telescopic and rotating landing gear with locking mechanism to stop them collapsing under the weight of the toy is perfectly feasible in 1/60 scale. One of the members here once built and sent me a working prototype to show Yamato. It worked damn well. Graham
  5. Notes to Bandai if you are listening. I can live with all the fiddly small parts and parts swapping, but if you want me to carry on buying these things for a 5,000+ Yen price, then at least make the following changes: - 1) Sell these things with a simple display stand and adaptors for all 3 modes, not just Battroid and Gerwalk. 2) Rework your Gerwalk stand adaptor so that it allows a spread-leg stance. 3) For fighter mode, engineer in some locking pegs for the wing gloves, to stop them flapping up all the time and also add some locking pegs for the lower legs to stop them sagging. Graham
  6. VT-1 was already publically announced and pictures were published in a recent issue of Macross Chronicles. This was scanned and posted in either the scoop thread or the 2-seater thread a few weeks ago already. If VT-1 is coming, of course VE-1 is coming (and very nice too). Graham
  7. All my 1/48s have recently been removed from my display cabinet, cleaned and packed in plastic storage boxes that I bought specially for the purpose of storing them. The V2 1/60 VF-1 has now completely replaced the 1/48 in my display cabinet. There are three reasons I decided to stop displaying my 1/48s: - 1) The new 1/60 has 2-seaters (VT-1, VE-1 & VF-1D). 2) The new 1/60 takes up less space, so I can display more Valks. 3) All the PT Valks in my display cabinet (with the exception of the VB-6), are now in a consistant 1/60 scale. Graham
  8. Heh, my 4 1/2 year old son likes Valk toys, but he doesn't want the 1/55 reissues I tried to give him. Instead he wants Daddy's 1/48s or V2 1/60s. Guess he has taste and is obviously not swayed by nostalgia. Graham
  9. Ah, OK, they must have lowered the prices recently then. Graham
  10. Highest price I've seen here in HK for the DX VF-25F is HK$1,598 at Animate. Graham
  11. Wow, can't belive it's 23 years since I first read Watchmen. Where does time go? Graham
  12. I'm not particulaly pro or anti-Bandai, I just like the VF-25 and want a decent toy of it. So far, despite it's various issues and inaccuracies, the DX is the best choice IMO. Graham
  13. Opens here on March 12. Will be seeing it on March 13. Graham
  14. Sigh....Yamato are not making a VF-4. Just because I said I wouldn't buy a Bandai VF-100's VF-4, some people took that to imply I was waiting for the Yamato version. The truth is I'm just not a fan of the VF-4 design, or the VF-9 for that matter. They are my least favorite VF designs & I don't care if they never get made as a toys. Please stay on topic.
  15. I'll still get a VF-171, VF-17 and VF-2SS if they are made in he VF100's line, but other releases I'll probably skip. And the reason a VF-4 is not on my 'must buy' list of VF100's is not beacuse Yamato is making it, but rather beacuse I'm not really a fan of the VF-4. Graham
  16. A quick battroid pic, snapped at night. Battroid is definitely the most stable and secure mode IMO and my favorite out of the three modes on the 1/100. However, after 3 days with the 1/100 VF-25F, I've decided I probably wont be buying anymore of the 1/100 VF-25 variants. They are just too fiddly and not enough fun IMO. It's DX all the way for me. While the DX is not perfect, it's certainly a lot more fun and far less troublesome than these pesky parts-formers. Graham
  17. Here you can see the cut-out on the underside of the nose, which the 1/100 designers obviously copied directly from the 1/60 DX sculpt, despite it being completely unecessary and having absolutely no function on the 1/100. Graham
  18. Got round to transforming to Gerwalk mode. You can get quite a good 'A' stance, due to the swivel joint below the hip. However, the knees actually have very limited forward bend, so you cannot get a good deep crouch pose in Gerwalk. In the attached photo, you can see the limit of the forward knee bend. Also, the Gerwalk mode does not balance well with the feet open and wants to tip forward. Like in most of the publicity photos, you have to close the feet in Gerwalk mode to get it to balance on the tips of the front and rear foot sections. Graham
  19. As has been explained many times over the years, toy licences in Japan are mostly non-exclusive and given to multiple licensors, unlike in the US, where often just one toy company is granted the master toy licence to manufacture any and all toys related to that franchise. In Japan, toys licences for a franchise are often granted on a scale or type basis to different companies. At the moment, Yamato holds licences with big west for the 1/48 VF-1 toys, 1/60 SDF, DYRL, M0 & M+ toys as well as the GNU and VFC figures. Bandai holds and exclusive Frontier licence and a 1/100 licence for all shows. The reason Bandai holds an exclusive licence for Frontier, is because were the major sponsor of the show and paid several million US$ to fund the production. Still, word goes that this exclusivity is only good for a few years. However, the same was true of Macross 7 and Bandai have been using their muscle to sit on the licence for over a decade, despite their exclusivity technically expiring. Graham
  20. Been spending a bit more time with the toy in battroid mode. Overall posability is actually pretty good. The swivel joint just below the intakes gives the legs a few more options for posing compared to the DX. Both the knee and the elbow joint on the 1/100 can bend 90 degrees. Sholder posability is a bit more limited than the DX due to the fixed nature of the 5-dot shoulder block, but not too bad. On the 1/100 the shoulder block non-movable (fixed in 1 position), and the shoulder connects to a ball on the 5-dot block). The lack of an open hand for holdingthe gunpod foregrip is a bit of a bummer though. Will try to post some pics later. Want to take some comparison pics with the DX. I'm warming to this thing slightly, although I still like the DX much more. Definitely prefer battroid mode on the 1/100 though. The non-locking wing gloves are a PITA in fighter mode. When you hold it in fighter mode, the wing gloves and wings constantly want to hing upwards due to the lack of any form of locking. Still haven't transformed it to Gerwalk mode yet. Graham
  21. I mean next new non-VF-1 PT variable 1/60. But anyway, this is the Bandai VF-100's thread, so no more Yamato talk here please. Graham
  22. The 1/55 Max DYRL VF-1A was a step in the right direction IMO, but I'm sure if Bandai had first reissued the 1/55 VF-1S Hikaru Strike Valk, VT-1, VE-1 and GBP-1S, sales would have been much improved. Too late now though I guess. Anyway, I think the impending summer release of Yamato's VT-1 and VE-1 V2 1/60 will likely kill most of the residual interest in the 1/55 versions anyway. Graham
  23. I've had my fair share of Throbbing Accidents! Graham
  24. My take on this is that you are never going to see a deal between BW and HG, too much bad blood there. Ditto, you will never see a deal between Toynami and Yamato, also too much bad blood. Both Yamato and I'm sure Bandai as well would love to be able to officially sell Macross goods outside of Japan, but I think BW will do their best to stop any deal dead as long as HG is still in the picture. Yamato are actually quite happy to work with HG, as are it seems Bandai, but BW will block any attempts by their licensors to do business with HG. And of course HG will block any attempts by Japanese companies to sell Macross into the US that try to bypass them, e.g. Sunwards. Graham
  25. Edited the topic title to remove the "Coming in July", as it is no longer relevant. Graham
×
×
  • Create New...